My sky daddy's name is Lloyd, thanks for asking, but usually people won't say anything bad back to you if you don't say anything bad to them first. The world has always been that way.
so the child "just wants to be held." possibly. THAT would be "grooming, wouldn't it? if i had gone home to tell rampart sr that "the bully was calling me gay. what does that mean" the result could easily have been domestic violence. (parenting in the paleolithic south was just a little different ) like most kids, we have to figure things like that out on our own or with peers.
And what about the parents who are caring? Accepting? You're making choices for them also. You use the excuse of shitty parents in order to turn as many kids as possible against their parents. Make them believe that parents won't accept them. That the only ones that actually care are teachers/the system. BULL ****. That is about control and indoctrination. WITH THE HELP OF PARENTS. Instead leftists make parents out to be the bad guys and keep as much info away from parents as possible. Teachers are supposed to be neutral. It is not up to them to decide what should and shouldn't be told to parents.
Nor should it be even. Parents should always take top priority since it is their children. The teachers work for the parents via tax payer funds.
Perhaps we should allow teachers to push religion? Are we still tolerant? What about being comfortable with being someone with a naturally strong immune system, who does not need to consume an inferior pharma product? How about being comfortable with ones right to bear arms? If you agree, its tolerant. If you disagree, its fascism. Putting criticism on ones own reflection aside, whats wrong with boycotts?
teachers work for the students, and with the parents. all book complaints in florida are from 11 parents. do these dozen "moms for liberty" have students in every district, or are they just self/fox radicalized randos pwning the libs? "we report, you decide."
All the Bxxxxxx think they can hit somebody because the Bxxxx subjectively chose to take offense. You can't just haul back and let go at words.
Actually yes you can. I'm not saying you should always do that, but if you started it then it's your fault. This isn't rocket science
No it is called common sense which is apparently sorely lacking these days and rocket science is hardly a substitute.
the founders, such as burr, could aim and fire at words. if, when trump called mrs cruz ugly, ted had punched his ugly nose we might not be in the second cruz administration, but we would not KNOW that the senator is a COWARD.
That is backwards. Does a waitress work for the people that come in to eat? Or does she work for the company that hired her? Irrelevant.
Well the founders weren't anarchists. I don't know much about Cruz other than he ain't eligible for president. How the fxxx does somebody's words give you the right to lay hands on them? Can you boys walk me through that again?
RWs dont want tolerance they believe their responce is the only correct one, they are on a pedophile kick of some sort which comes from their Q-anon" like sources, they dont even recognize the similarities between the anti-semetic propaganda which circulated in pre-nazi germany, and how hitler simply adopted it for his cause, because the dont read or know history as a general rule
a traditional waitress works for, and is paid by, her customers. in these degraded times, management often does hold her tips, resulting in the pitiful service at such venues.
The problem is, if you do not tolerate intolerance then you have to differentiate between exactly what types of issues you are not willing to tolerate. If you really follow that line of logical thought, then you will see that "tolerance" isn't really an innately meaningful concept by itself. I think there may be some analogy to idealistic pacifism here. Of course typically all these words have loaded meanings.
Yup. I heard of them splitting tips which is bullxxxx becuase the reason I tipped the dude is because of the service the dude gave me. It wasn't a team effort on the part of fellow employees or I would have tipped them too!
they can' t even draw the obvious line between the "day care pedophiles" of the reagan era and today's "grooming teachers."
You're avoiding the point. Replace "waitress" with any other type of job. Dishwasher for example. Cook for another example. Secretary for another. Etc etc etc. The point is that the employed work for whoever hired them. Not the people they are serving.
School is a place to address Reading Math History etc. Sexual Orientation discussion has NO place in school. That's what parents are for. Your aim in this madness is to usurp the rights of parents. A lot of us regret the idea that government ever had a role in educating our children in the first place. You want to conform our children to your twisted world. This is why we will have a decline in Public Education and further polarization in America.
in ohio at least a waitress is a tipped postion and exempted from wage laws, meaning a waitresses income comes mostly from customers of which better service equates to a high wage
This is not the thread for you to throw insults and project your godlessness. Anyway......contemplate this!
what are you talking about? school is the place to address football, the 10 commandments, and the pledge of allegiance. the rest of that stuff is just lib'ral nonsense to keep the best white players off the team.