Yup. It created a fireball came down the shaft and burned David Felipe just as William Rodriguez described it. http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0209/11/se.48.html
Those were the sounds of the COLLAPSE and they ALL occurred AFTER the buildings started falling which BLOWS A MASSIVE HOLE in your inane conspiracy drivel that your "imaginary explosions" happened BEFORE the planes hit the towers! Timing is EVERYTHING and you don't have any to support your BOGUS flailing! This is way too easy!
Slick Willy Rodriguez wears many hats, my friend: Magician's assistant Heroic janitor Truther Superstar
Question for you Koko. Do you believe every single one of those "real explosions" heard at the WTC due to explosives?
How many times does it need to be posted for you? 100's of people reported explosions Gam and explosives cause explosions, thats the way explosives work. If you hear a big BOOM and your car is scattered all over the street in pieces that is an explosion which is evidence of explosives. They simply deny everything out of hand and cant post anything in support of their claims because they simply make the **** up. Bingo! The laughable part is they think they are making convincing arguments. WTG Bob! They will deny it of course with nothing but some useless bullshit line that makes them feel good.. How many more do you need Gam? I have no idea what Harrit used. Please explain what the difference is between cutting steel and burning through steel? You have yet to prove planes impacted the wtc. Some people imagined that a plane hit wtc1 damned if any forensics experts could find it. Yeh it is when you believe the baseless opinions you post is proof. Now if you used the words MASSIVE and COLLAPSE, and dont forget INFERNO and RAGING FIRES then more people are likely to believe it you know. He's right though. I didnt hear every single explosion, the explosions I heard were absolutely a result of very high explosives. REAL explosions at the WTC
And besides all the bullet point EVIDENCE and grand jury incriminating EVIDENCE, I missed 2 lengthy threads chock full of detailed EVIDENCE proving beyond the shadow of any doubt that the OCT is a massive fraud (except for OCT lovers of course who willfully will not and never will see anything that contradicts the OCT). http://www.politicalforum.com/index...mission-scam-exposed-in-all-its-glory.495859/ http://www.politicalforum.com/index.php?threads/the-nist-9-11-scam-exposed-in-all-its-glory.458597/ But I'll tell you what OCT hero and die hard defender of OCT "truth" (would that be a "truther" in your vernacular?), I'll give you the same advice I've given other like minded heroes. As a devout defender of the OCT, you do have the constitutionally protected right to file an Amicus Curiae brief in the Southern District of New York in defense of the OCT. And I will personally protect all your rights as much as I'm able. I'll even help you with your brief since I've had a bit of experience with legal briefs. You can even include your esteemed opinion of why Willie Rodriguez's testimony, corroborated by other eyewitnesses who were with him and those who were injured, should be tossed. And if you're really good at this, include why the testimony of over 100 eyewitnesses who saw, felt and were injured by EXPLOSIONS and dozens of other eyewitnesses who claim to have seen MOLTEN STEEL should also be tossed because although you weren't there, you're so incredibly brilliant that you know better than they do. But you're still correct, I don't own any evidence and neither do you or anyone else. I'm glad you agree too because that's a non sequitur (as in a no brainer). The EVIDENCE for the 9/11 criminal fraud speaks for itself and it is OVERWHELMING, isn't it now? What I've posted is merely the tip of the iceberg.
You people really need to learn how to distinguish between a pile of junk laying around that proves nothing more than you have a pile of junk laying around and proving that an impact took place. I saw no plane impact, Gam et al, you need to first prove that an UNPHOTOSHOPPED plane struck the wtc. Please try to refrain from boring me with more photo opps of trash laying around that has nothing to do with proving an impact took place. I'm still waiting.
Here is a NEWSFLASH for trooffers! There were news helicopters and camera crews all around the WTC after the first plane impact. The second impact was LIVE STREAMED including via the internet. Are you PRETENDING that every news organization was in on your ludicrous conspiracy? How many millions of people all took part in it? Strange how not a single one of them has ever come forward.
Im glad you can laugh at yourself since youve posted 'nothing' that proves a plane impacted the wtc. Furthermore I asked to see proof that a 'plane' any kind of UNPHOTOSHOPPED 'plane' impacted wtc 1. Anything? Anything at all for us? Still waiting.
All of those live cameras from multiple different angles were ALL PHOTOSHOPPED in REAL TIME? In order to believe something that ABSURDLY ludicrous exposes a serious disconnect from reality. How did the "government" just happen to know EXACTLY where each camera crew and helicopter was going to be at the exact moment of the 2nd impact? How many other imaginary videos do you trooffers have that show that there was NO plane when the second impact occurred? Where is your CREDIBLE EVIDENCE that there was any video photoshopping?
ah still nothing Its not about what you believe, ITS ABOUT WHAT YOU CAN PROVE, you failed to prove a plane impacted wtc1 and wtc2. So I am done waiting, you have proven YOU HAVE NO PROOF only FALSE CONCLUSIONS. thanks for playing though.
You are the one making the absurd and BASELESS allegation that there was no plane. Onus is ENTIRELY ON YOU to DISPROVE all of the FACTUAL EVIDENCE of the plane impact! You can't which is why you resort to puerile meaningless retorts.
Please study the English language and grammar if you wish to communicate with me. I make no allegations what so ever, please learn the difference BETWEEN an ALLEGATION and a DEMAND FOR PROOF. You have given us NO FACTS, only FALSE CONCLUSIONS, derived from false ASSumptions. Moving on..... If there is anyone else who wants to step up to the plate to PROVE planes did in fact impact the wtc please do so. (and please spare me more meaningless junk piles)
Ironic coming from someone who makes such loose use of the language himself! Your ABJECT FAILURE to support your asinine allegations has effectively downgraded your credibility into negative territory.
What caused the airplane-shaped holes if it wasn't planes. 9/11: Footage of the the South Tower being hit I've made my opinion clear on truthers who support the no-plane theory before. http://www.whale.to/m/disin.html http://www.whale.to/b/sweeney.html (excerpt) ------------------------------------- 4) Teamwork. They tend to operate in self-congratulatory and complementary packs or teams. Of course, this can happen naturally in any public forum, but there will likely be an ongoing pattern of frequent exchanges of this sort where professionals are involved. Sometimes one of the players will infiltrate the opponent camp to become a source for straw man or other tactics designed to dilute opponent presentation strength. ------------------------------------- provocateurs,shills and disinfo agents (7:20 time mark) I hate to say it but it looks suspiciously like you two are working together.
with cutter and bump charges I can make any cutout you want. Thanks for making your opinion perfectly clear, however your perfectly clear opinion does nothing to prove the point. you have also made it perfectly clear that you want to sweep demands of proof under the table. Stop accusing me before looking in the mirror. Now back to the point, proof that a plane any plane impacted WTC1. Waiting.
Planes struck the towers, but AA11 and UA175 did not strike the towers. A magnificent deception was accomplished by the perps.
I guess that's a good point. What about all of the different cameras that took footage of the second impact? Was the 9/11 Attack the 2001 Version of "Operation Northwoods"? (7:52 time mark)
Why is EVERYONE running from proving a 'plane' hit wtc1? I asked for proof a plane struck wtc1 I dont see a plane. I just see an explosion with whitish-beige-browninsh smoke and a yellow-orange flame.
It can be seen in this video. It zooms in closer. The Only Existing Footage Of 1st Plane Hitting WTC (1:05 time mark)
