Trump: No taxes on Social Security

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by Lil Mike, Jul 31, 2024.

  1. Andrew Jackson

    Andrew Jackson Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2016
    Messages:
    51,307
    Likes Received:
    34,468
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Already posted...
    Looks like a bit late (about a day) with this topic:
    http://www.politicalforum.com/index.php?threads/trump-no-taxes-on-social-security.620566/

    Anyway, on-topic:
    I will just repost what I posted in the original thread:
    Horrible idea...
    Blatantly obvious attempt to pander to.older voters...
    Epic fail...
     
  2. TomFitz

    TomFitz Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2013
    Messages:
    42,660
    Likes Received:
    17,805
    Trophy Points:
    113
    $44K is just about the top SS benefit. Meaning that the recipient was making decent money when they retired.
     
    Quantum Nerd and Hey Now like this.
  3. Alwayssa

    Alwayssa Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2012
    Messages:
    36,016
    Likes Received:
    8,962
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It used to be that way, up to 1983 when Ronald Reagan signed into law taxing the SS payments received.

    The main problem today is that the threshold for taxing SS has not changed with inflation. It is still set at the 1986 levels of $25k and 32k respectively, and 85% for MFS. This has brought in more tax revenue, especially for those retirees who bring in income other than SS and are now required to receive SS based on their age.

    But it does not solve the debt problem and the Republican Study Committee has drastic cuts for SS. I think this is more of a smoke screen on what the Republican Study Committee has proposed and does not want that issue to be debated. Trump is trying to change the narrative, but I am afraid the cat is already out of the bag.

    Here is the FY 2025 GOP Study Committee Budget:
    https://hern.house.gov/uploadedfiles/rsc_fy_2025_budget-section_by_sectionfinal325.pdf

    Here is what it says with SS:
    "Spending on Social Security will grow tremendously between FY 2023 and 2034, from nearly from $1.5 trillion to $2.5 trillion The RSC Budget is committed to preventing 23 percent across the board cuts in benefits that will hit every Social Security recipient in 2033. Unlike the Biden budget, which does nothing to prevent these cuts, the RSC Budget would phase in common-sense, bipartisan reforms that have been narrowly tailored to affect no senior in or near retirement. These reforms would collectively stave off Biden’s 23 percent cuts to Social Security benefits and eventually make the retirement trust fund sustainably solvent. These include modest and delayed changes to the Primary Insurance Amount (PIA) benefit formula, the retirement age, auxiliary benefits for high-income earners, and gradually moving towards a flat benefit. President Biden supported similar reforms during his tenure as Senator and none of these changes would affect anyone in or near retirement."

    Increasing the retirement age might work, but increasing the Primary Insurance Amount formula and a flat benefit amount, which will hurt more poor and middle Americans than the upper incoem bracket. Not a good plan MO and will not pass either the House or Senate, even with GOP control.
     
    TomFitz likes this.
  4. mstrman

    mstrman Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2023
    Messages:
    4,718
    Likes Received:
    8,981
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I must apologize for the disagreement, but as a baby boomer myself, I can say that every baby boomer I'm acquainted with supports Trump for POTUS. Perhaps it would be best not to generalize opinions about all baby boomers.
     
  5. TomFitz

    TomFitz Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2013
    Messages:
    42,660
    Likes Received:
    17,805
    Trophy Points:
    113

    it was enough for most of them to have you point out that SSA wasn't taxed until Ronald Reagan got it taxed in 1983. You are correct, of course!

    One must give Reagan credit for the adjustments in FICA/FUTA, and the revisions to the retirement age (not convenient for me at the moment!), that allowed the Trust Fund to be stabalized.

    The most effective solution is to raise that payroll tax rate slightly, emiminate the cap on maximum taxable income, and look at pushing the retirement age past 66.5.

    Variations of these ideas have been proposed many times over the least twenty years. The numbers work, and the impact is the best on could hope for.
     
    Last edited: Aug 1, 2024
  6. Nwolfe35

    Nwolfe35 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2013
    Messages:
    9,947
    Likes Received:
    7,325
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Someone getting 44K IN INTEREST is rich.

    To get 44K in INTEREST (assuming a very fat 7% annual return) means the investment itself is worth something in the neighborhood of 650,000 that they never have to touch to get the 44,000
    So there income is 44,000 but their NET WORTH is almost 1,000,000
     
  7. Lil Mike

    Lil Mike Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2011
    Messages:
    53,572
    Likes Received:
    24,597
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yes, making social security payments tax free.
     
  8. Lil Mike

    Lil Mike Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2011
    Messages:
    53,572
    Likes Received:
    24,597
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Have Kamala roll this out as her social security reform plan. I would be curious as to the reception.
     
  9. Talon

    Talon Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2008
    Messages:
    47,928
    Likes Received:
    27,831
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Great idea. I'm getting a much better return on my private investments, so that should compensate for the losses that the nomenklatura in Washington have cost me by forcing me to pay into their government-run Ponzi scheme/slush fund.
     
    Lil Mike likes this.
  10. Lil Mike

    Lil Mike Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2011
    Messages:
    53,572
    Likes Received:
    24,597
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Has this "Humpty" thing caught on yet? It seems you are the only one I've seen who uses it and I confess, I don't even get it. Must be Aussie humor (excuse me, humour).
     
    Shutcie likes this.
  11. Lil Mike

    Lil Mike Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2011
    Messages:
    53,572
    Likes Received:
    24,597
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I'm aware of the doomsday clock that social security is facing, but are you saying that federal income tax on social security income goes back into the social security trust fund? If so, I wasn't aware of that.
     
  12. Lil Mike

    Lil Mike Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2011
    Messages:
    53,572
    Likes Received:
    24,597
    Trophy Points:
    113
    An interesting topic for another thread, but how much would you have to raise the Medicare portion of FICA to pay for that?
     
  13. Lil Mike

    Lil Mike Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2011
    Messages:
    53,572
    Likes Received:
    24,597
    Trophy Points:
    113
    An article on the proposal

    Donald Trump calls for elimination of tax on Social Security

    Taxation on Social Security dates back to a bipartisan reform measure signed into law by former President Ronald Reagan in 1983 that was intended to shore up the solvency of the program’s trust fund. Generally speaking, there is a tax of up to 50% tax on one’s Social Security benefits if total income is between 25,000 and $34,000 – and up to an 85% tax on benefits when income is over $34,000, according to the Social Security Administration.
     
  14. cd8ed

    cd8ed Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2011
    Messages:
    43,521
    Likes Received:
    35,064
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    If I had that level of sway on government things would be vastly different
     
  15. Bearack

    Bearack Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2011
    Messages:
    8,029
    Likes Received:
    7,636
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Or just maybe, that is common sense policy as many seniors struggle on fixed incomes... especially with this high inflation tearing them apart!
     
  16. Golem

    Golem Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2016
    Messages:
    46,200
    Likes Received:
    20,717
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I don't know if that's wise. Taxes in Social Security would need to be compensated for in some other way. And the Republicans FAVORITE way to compensate for any tax cut is to look at Medicare and Social Security. So eliminating taxes and cutting benefits does not sound like a great idea. If it weren't SS benefits that are cut, payroll taxes would probably need to be increased. Which means salaries would have to be increased, which means... inflation. And if you DEPEND on social security and Medicare, you don't want inflation. If you don't depend on those, which are usually the folks that are taxed, it won't matter much of a difference to you.

    It sounds great as a campaign slogan, but Trump is not going to tell you HOW he will do it. So you can lay that down to rest. It's just demagoguery.
     
    Last edited: Aug 1, 2024
  17. Bullseye

    Bullseye Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2021
    Messages:
    14,525
    Likes Received:
    12,397
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    The only person baby boomers want to vote for less than Trump is any Democrat.
     
  18. Bullseye

    Bullseye Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2021
    Messages:
    14,525
    Likes Received:
    12,397
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    You do know payroll taxes PAY FOR Social Security benefits, right. And Medicare as well. Surplus FICA in the late 90's "helped pay for Clinton's 'surpluses'"
     
    conservaliberal and Turtledude like this.
  19. FreshAir

    FreshAir Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2012
    Messages:
    156,234
    Likes Received:
    66,791
    Trophy Points:
    113
    it would be cheaper than buying separate insurance for that 20%
     
  20. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    160,327
    Likes Received:
    41,374
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I think you are the one confused. @Endeavor claims uncapping FICA contributions and applying it to all wages and salary in order to get the rich will fund SS till the end of the century. As I note capgains, which is the bulk of income for the high earners, are not subject to FICA contributions. So yes you are correct FICA has nothing to do with capgains but incorrect that I was claiming otherwise. And of course they don't pay to keep the lights on in Alaska of all places.
     
  21. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    160,327
    Likes Received:
    41,374
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    And where do you make up the shortfall SS is already going insolvent?
     
  22. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    160,327
    Likes Received:
    41,374
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Only 40% or recipient's have to pay any tax and that is because of other investments and income which they would still have to report.
     
  23. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    160,327
    Likes Received:
    41,374
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Why are they struggling of fixed incomes?.......................because of Biden inflationary policies. Let's just end those.
     
    cyndibru and Bearack like this.
  24. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    160,327
    Likes Received:
    41,374
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    When do I get some of this money to pay by light bill I certainly haven't seen it nor do I see where our local power generation is getting any of it? Why do you oppose federal welfare to poor blacks you haven't said yet? Shall we end all federal welfare is that what you are seeking?

    BTW you can send some of this back in the meantime

    Which States Use the Most Federal Aid?

    The federal government grants billions of dollars to state and local governments. These grants comprise a sizable portion of these smaller governments’ budgets. The federal government provided almost $1.3 trillion in grants to state and local governments in 2021, an increase of over $400 billion since 2019.

    • California received the most from the federal government, $162.9 billion, followed by New York ($110.2 billion), Texas ($105.8 billion), Florida ($58.8 billion), and Pennsylvania ($57.1 billion).
    https://www.onfocus.news/which-states-use-the-most-federal-aid/
     
    Last edited: Aug 1, 2024
  25. The Mello Guy

    The Mello Guy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2010
    Messages:
    114,058
    Likes Received:
    41,047
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So let’s raise the amount before they start getting taxed, we don’t need to give a tax break to Donald Trump or Warren Buffef.
     

Share This Page