The vertical and horizontal collapses happened internally. The details of the collapse are clearly outlined in the NIST report. There are videos out there that show something was happening inside the building prior to the external collapse. Truthers will only see what they want to see.
why not just say their are no videos.... no videos of this vertical then horizontal collapse... or the 47 floor raging inferno.. no photographic evidence exists...why can you just say that?
Why are you constantly lying about what people say? Is the only evidence you will believe photographic in nature? If this was some big conspiracy, don't you think they would have doctored up some photos just to keep truthers happy? I already claimed there is a video that backs up the NIST theory. Why do you insist there is no video? Is it just because you will deny the video?
you have video of the vertical then horizontal collapse? in 11 years ive never seen it... where can i view it? does gravy have it?
Stop putting words in people's mouths. I didn't say I had video of the vertical and then horizontal collapse. I said I had video that backs up the NIST's theory. I also stated that truthers dismiss it out of hand, which makes the whole point of posting it rather moot, wouldn't you say?
No clear video of the vertical and horizontal collapse exists. A clear video backing up the NIST's claim does exist. Truthers like to pretend it doesn't because it makes them look bad.
WTC 7 was hit. You've just blatantly lied about WTC 7. It had a 110 story building fall on it. WTC 7 did collapse. You got that part right. It burned for numerous hours and showed clear signs of collapse long before it actually collapsed. In fact, it was such a danger that the FDNY cleared the area around WTC 7 to protect people from the collapse. The NIST figured out how it was possible for WTC 7 to collapse. No credible source has ever been able to refute the NIST theory. And since you can't commit to anything other than you don't believe, that is where it ends for you. I believe you are done here as well.
so.... 110 stories fell onto it.. any photo or video of the tower breaking off at the base... flying over to wtc7 and "hitting" it?
<sigh> WTC7 was a block away from the towers,it didn't have to 'fly' anywhere. Are you REALLY so obtuse as to think none of the debris from the towers impacted on 7?
No, any source based on facts and evidence. Horrible effort in trying to put words in my mouth, group thinker.
Wait. You've already made your claim. No amount of evidence will convince you of anything else, so it is pointless to even discuss anything with you. Why do you even ask for evidence when you've already made your position crystal clear? Flight 77 didn't hit the pentagon. Flight 93 didn't crash in Shanksville. The towers fell too fast. WTC 7 fell. We get it. Move on already. Pretending you actually want to discuss 9/11, the evidence or anything else is a waste of time. You've admitted it.
well...... someone said that a 110 story building hit wtc7.. instead of a pile of debris.. do you think it was hit by debris or a 110 story building?
You want to play games? Go somewhere else. You know what I meant. You've made your claims. You won't be moved by evidence. There is no sense debating someone like that. And as I recall, you made the claim WTC 7 wasn't hit at all.
