Twitter Execs Sought Rules to Ban Trump Alone, Files Say

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by XXJefferson#51, Dec 11, 2022.

  1. XXJefferson#51

    XXJefferson#51 Banned

    Joined:
    May 29, 2017
    Messages:
    16,405
    Likes Received:
    14,889
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Senior Twitter executives sought on January 7, 2021, the day after the Capitol riot, "to create justifications to ban Trump - seek a change of policy for Trump alone, distinct from other political leaders - express no concern for the free speech or democracy implications of a ban," according to the fourth installment of the Twitter Filesreleased Saturday night.

    "For years, Twitter had resisted calls to ban Trump," author Michael Shellenberger and journalist Leighton Woodhouse write, quoting the executives themselves: "'Blocking a world leader from Twitter,' it wrote in 2018, 'would hide important info... [and] hamper necessary discussion around their words and actions.'"

    Following the events of January 6, internal and external pressure on then-Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey began to grow, according to the report. Former first lady Michelle Obama and several other prominent individuals and groups called on Twitter to permanently ban the president…



    …The report notes that Twitter's staff and senior execuitves "were overwhelmingly progressive," pointing out that in 2018, 2020, and 2022, 96%, 98%, & 99% of Twitter staff's political donations went to Democrats.

    But the bias wass deeper than simply donating to Democrats.…










    Read more news: https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/twitter-files/2022/12/10/id/1099978/






    This breaking news story is shocking but not a big surprise to us. Twitter was rife with bias and openly taking sides. They trampled upon the 1st amendment too.
     
    Eleuthera likes this.
  2. XXJefferson#51

    XXJefferson#51 Banned

    Joined:
    May 29, 2017
    Messages:
    16,405
    Likes Received:
    14,889
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Trump was targeted by the prior fascist regime at Twitter and other big tech social media places. Musk buying Twitter is the salvation of the 1st amendment to the constitution.
     
    Louisiana75 likes this.
  3. Moolk

    Moolk Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2020
    Messages:
    20,352
    Likes Received:
    15,687
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Not surprising, the lefts irrational hatred for Trump has caused a lot of logically inconsistent behavior from Dems.
     
  4. The Mello Guy

    The Mello Guy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2010
    Messages:
    114,698
    Likes Received:
    41,533
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Imagine if the Weimar Republic had just kept hitler locked up after the first attempt to seize power. Only him. Probably would have worked.
     
    WalterSobchak likes this.
  5. Curious Always

    Curious Always Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2016
    Messages:
    17,545
    Likes Received:
    13,840
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    What 1st Amendment rules did Twitter break? Pro tip, only government can violate your 1st amendment rights. Were my 1st amendment rights violated when Hannity kicked me off his forum 15 years ago?

    I don’t suppose there is a chance we can discuss Twitter’s pathetic policies while agreeing there are no constitutional violations, here?
     
    Last edited: Dec 11, 2022
  6. Pro_Line_FL

    Pro_Line_FL Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2018
    Messages:
    30,807
    Likes Received:
    17,215
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    They let him post 57 000 times and warned him many times about rules violation, but after Jan-6 they had to block him. And no, first amendment has nothing to do with how social media run their websites.

    You have no clue what the 1st amendment is about.
     
    Last edited: Dec 11, 2022
    WalterSobchak, yardmeat, bx4 and 3 others like this.
  7. Andrew Jackson

    Andrew Jackson Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2016
    Messages:
    51,699
    Likes Received:
    34,736
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Agreed.
    The person you responded to has an egregious misunderstanding of the 1st Amendment...
     
  8. mdrobster

    mdrobster Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2011
    Messages:
    35,556
    Likes Received:
    14,054
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Trump can always come back to Twitter, but not Kanye West. :)
     
  9. fmw

    fmw Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2009
    Messages:
    40,724
    Likes Received:
    15,654
    Trophy Points:
    113
    True. He just should have said free speech instead of first amendment.
     
  10. Louisiana75

    Louisiana75 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2011
    Messages:
    11,665
    Likes Received:
    12,012
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    They blocked him after Jan 6th because they didn't want the truth to show that he was not inciting violence, in fact, he was promoting peace.

    But the jig is up, Twitter execs are exposed and so is the DNC.
     
    Overitall and Moolk like this.
  11. Pro_Line_FL

    Pro_Line_FL Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2018
    Messages:
    30,807
    Likes Received:
    17,215
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I see. So the 57 000 posts where he was not inciting violence was ok, but the one after Jan-6 was not. I'm sure that makes sense to you, but it failed the basics common sense test.
     
    WalterSobchak and bx4 like this.
  12. Louisiana75

    Louisiana75 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2011
    Messages:
    11,665
    Likes Received:
    12,012
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    The left had an agenda and they needed to silence Trump. Twitter was happy to help. What happened prior is meaningless.
     
  13. Eleuthera

    Eleuthera Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2015
    Messages:
    23,701
    Likes Received:
    12,302
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Exactly! The government cannot impede the right to speak, but corporations working for the government can crush individuals who speak out. The Ministry of Truth works through Twitter and FaceBook.
     
  14. Overitall

    Overitall Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2021
    Messages:
    12,183
    Likes Received:
    11,549
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Perhaps you can clarify your meaning.

    ". . .57,000 posts . . . not inciting violence was ok, but the one (not inciting violence) after Jan-6 was not."

    Is that what you meant?
     
  15. Think for myself

    Think for myself Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2008
    Messages:
    65,462
    Likes Received:
    4,801
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Well, why wouldn’t there be specific rules for Trump? There is one current president. Certainly Twitter had allowed him a lot more leeway than other individuals regarding posting the crap he posted.
     
  16. Curious Always

    Curious Always Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2016
    Messages:
    17,545
    Likes Received:
    13,840
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    What right to free speech did Twitter violate? I’m aware of no laws requiring companies to give you a venue for your speech.
     
    WalterSobchak and FreshAir like this.
  17. FreshAir

    FreshAir Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2012
    Messages:
    156,942
    Likes Received:
    67,184
    Trophy Points:
    113
    before Trump, they never thought they would have to ban a politician for inciting a riot

    when people do things like that, new rules are created

    we have seen it here, new rules come into play when things change, we had special rules for the tea party, remember the tea bag hats for instance

    Another nothing burger
     
    Last edited: Dec 11, 2022
    WalterSobchak likes this.
  18. FreshAir

    FreshAir Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2012
    Messages:
    156,942
    Likes Received:
    67,184
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Musk doesn't believe in free speech, I guess </end sarcasm>
     
  19. FreshAir

    FreshAir Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2012
    Messages:
    156,942
    Likes Received:
    67,184
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Not surprising, the Trumpers irrational love for Trump has caused a lot of logically inconsistent behavior from the right.
     
    WalterSobchak likes this.
  20. Moolk

    Moolk Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2020
    Messages:
    20,352
    Likes Received:
    15,687
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Incorrect
     
  21. mdrobster

    mdrobster Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2011
    Messages:
    35,556
    Likes Received:
    14,054
    Trophy Points:
    113
    He seems more bent on stirring the pot than actually making a profit with Twitter.
     
    Noone, FreshAir and WalterSobchak like this.
  22. yardmeat

    yardmeat Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2010
    Messages:
    66,354
    Likes Received:
    37,028
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Then you haven't read the 1st amendment.
     
    Noone likes this.
  23. Zorro

    Zorro Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2015
    Messages:
    82,653
    Likes Received:
    57,328
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Our nation's commitment to Free Speech far exceeds the First Amendment.

    The Twitter Files: The Corporate Media Ignores The Biggest Story Of The Decade
    [​IMG]
    Twitter was participating in a form of sedition, along with the agencies that they cooperated with...

    Jonathan Turley: Dupe or Designated Defendant? The Criminal Case Against Jack Dorsey

    'Potential criminal liability for Twitter executives, particularly Jack Dorsey, after the release of the Twitter files. The files contradict denials of Dorsey that there was no censorship or shadow banning targeting conservatives. Dorsey and others should clearly retain counsel in light of the contradictions in these files.'

    It's all fun and games until you are busted engaging in sedition and violating the rights of your fellow Americans to rig a presidential election.
     
    Last edited: Dec 11, 2022
  24. Curious Always

    Curious Always Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2016
    Messages:
    17,545
    Likes Received:
    13,840
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    Where in the constitution does it say I owe you a platform for your speech?
     
    Noone likes this.
  25. Pro_Line_FL

    Pro_Line_FL Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2018
    Messages:
    30,807
    Likes Received:
    17,215
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Silence him AFTER he was voted out of the office. Sorry, but its still not making any sense.

    I think Lousiana75 was trying to say that, yes.
     
    Last edited: Dec 11, 2022
    Noone likes this.

Share This Page