Under Biden Harris, The US Government has sent $231M To The Taliban since the bugout.

U.S. Government Has Sent $239 Million to Taliban Since 2021.

Harris and Biden bug out and keep funding the Taliban? But no way in hell can we stop taxing tips?

'The U.S. government has sent at least $239 million to the Taliban in development assistance since 2021.

"At least'? So they can't even figure out how much they sent them.

'Since the 2021 U.S. military withdrawal, at least $239 million have likely filled the Taliban’s coffers.'

'And there’s the billions of dollars worth of military equipment we left when the Biden-Harris administration bugged out in 2021:'



But, if we stop taxing tips, the roof falls in.

It sure seemed different while Trump was president.

Please discuss.

 

Not much to discuss, really.
We need to get spending under control and that has to include foreign aid.

An across the board cut of at least 25% is the only course we have left.

 

Government bureaucrats are not exactly the most financially savvy types.

 

Sorry, this is total made up fake news... your link isn't credible.

 

My god.

That info graphic is disturbing. Who the hell makes the decision to pull out in a fashion like that and leave all that behind?

 

If Biden Harris Loved Terrorists and hated America, what would they do differently than what they are doing?

Kamala is Anti-Israel. Her Husband’s Law Firm Repped the PLO. The PLO’s money arm was the largest foreign principal for his law firm.

Her brother in law, who is now on the campaign, repped the American Taliban, 'John Walker Lindh, who abandoned the US to train with Osama bin Laden and fight for the Taliban in Afghanistan.'


John Walker Lindh

With the wide open border they have made sure that the Taliban is embedded, Hamas, Hezbollah and so on. The next time they unleash riots and violence against our cities, it won't just be BLM and Antifa.

 

The NYT's noted that Emhoff, 'the husband of Kamala Harris, was a partner at DLA Piper whose “lobbying clients” had included the governments of Afghanistan and Bahrain, as well as the Qatari government-funded Al Jazeera Network and the Palestine Monetary Authority.'

No wonder Kamala is pro-Hamas.

 

Leading Report??? Really?



Par for the course with righties on here.

 

I wonder if any of the money has gone to promote tourism:

 

Giving "aid and comfort" to enemies..... hhhhmmmm.... where have I heard that before?
Aug 14, 2024

https://x.com/visegrad24/status/1823725320685674919?ref_src=twsrc^tfw|twcamp^tweetembed|twterm^1823725320685674919|twgr^b816eb678ddba7a1f7d95308761be7aa9c994fea|twcon^s1_&ref_url=https://americanmilitarynews.com/2024/08/videos-pics-taliban-parades-us-military-vehicles-3-years-after-biden-harris-disastrous-withdrawal/

 

Still pushing the fake fact check site I see...

Media Bias Fact Check Literally is a written opinion site by a man with a ""Communications Degree in college"" Dave Van Zandt

The flagrant and simplistic nature of these bogus critiques suggests that Media Bias Fact Check is either inept and/or dishonest.
https://www.justfactsdaily.com/media-bias-fact-check-incompetent-or-dishonest

Discredited, self-styled ‘fact-checker’ website was served with a ‘cease and desist’ legal notice today for publishing unsubstantiated and defamatory claims against Principia Scientific International (PSI).
MEDIA BIAS/FACT CHECK site owner admits he is unqualified and misrepresented himself as a seasoned journalist.
https://climatechangedispatch.com/media-bias-fact-check-site-served-cease-and-desist/

Media Bias/Fact Check bills itself as "The most comprehensive media bias resource." It's run by Dave Van Zandt, making it fair to say it's run by "some guy" ("Dave studied Communications in college" is his main claim to expertise).
We have nothing against "some guy" possessing expertise despite a lack of qualifications, of course. One doesn't need a degree or awards (or audience) to be right about stuff. But is Van Zandt and his Media Bias/Fact Check right about PolitiFact?
https://www.politifactbias.com/2017/10/can-you-trust-what-media-biasfact-check.html

Media Bias Fact Check Is a Major SCAM to Silence the Right
https://www.independentsentinel.com/media-bias-fact-checking-scam-silence-right/

Don't trust Fact checkers, especially not this one. It favors fake news on the left, and to true sites that are not on the mainstream media, it labels as conspiracy theory and junk pseudo science, when the truth is just the opposite. This website is as biased and as full of lies as you get.
https://www.sitejabber.com/reviews/mediabiasfactcheck.com

Conservatives have criticized the liberal "fact-checking" website for being subjective and often outright false.[19][20][21] On their "10 Best Fact Checking Sites," they list several objectively false and generally inaccurate left-wing "fact-checkers," including PolitiFact, Snopes, and the Fact Checker by the Washington Post.[22]
Media Bias Fact Check sources its information from the Anti-Defamation League and the left-wing Southern Poverty Law Center in order to inaccurately label right-wing websites and organizations as "questionable" sources according to Robert Spencer, who wrote to Media Bias/Fact Check's editor describing the attacks on his website, Jihad Watch, as "pure libel," afterward claiming he received no response from the editor.[23]
https://conservapedia.com/Media_Bias_Fact_Check

Perhaps the most jarring instance of these scams is a site called “Media Bias Fact Check” which turns out to be just one guy making up whatever he feels like about news outlets, based on what he admits is his personal opinion, while typically providing no evidence – and then altering the ratings of news outlets who point out his scam.
https://www.palmerreport.com/politics/palmer-report-exclusive-media-bias-fact-check/2115/

Overall, such fallacious attacks on outsider-opinion represent an effort to strangle social discourse from the top down. In this writer’s opinion, sites like Media Bias Fact Check constitute a desperate retaliatory measure in the wake of the legacy media’s loss of collective attention, and seek to reinforce narrative control in the hands of organizations like the Atlantic Council while smearing reliable sources of scientific journalism like WikiLeaks.
https://www.investmentwatchblog.com...ikileaks-supports-western-propaganda-machine/

If Media Bias Fact Check were to be given a rating, they would be “Left” with “Mixed” honesty. Interestingly enough, they don’t rate themselves. Not that it matters, they’d certainly put themselves squarely in the middle as “Least Biased” with “High” ratings for honesty, neither of which are even remotely true
https://www.tnvalleytalks.com/topic/media-bias-fact-check-incompetent-or-just-dishonest

NewsGuard Rates OANN, Newsmax, LifeNews Less Credible than Chinese State-Run Media
https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/f...rd-newsguard-rates-oann-newsmax-lifenews-less