Did you watch it after the guy walks away and it's been a few seconds after he shoots and you still hear guns going off? It replays the 1st part a bunch but the part after is when they slink away and you still hear gunfire.
Hmmm. I see what you mean, but I am not sure if it means anything, (If you see what I mean.) I am still thinking all the shots are coming from the same area, not an acoustics expert so I don't know what, if anything could account for the volume ect... It does seem more like flash light to me though...Could be coincidental there were shots being fired rather rapidly, bound to hear at the same time you see the light...
In your OP you say, "Still no motive" ... There are some who think, (and I feel it's likely), that a possible reason was one I have read on Reddit: " it may have been a medical issue and that something was wrong with his brain. It probably got worse and worse for him until he eventually snapped and carried out the attack. Something similar to the case of Charles Whitman, who was a normal person up until one day when he started having violent thoughts about wanting killing his wife and mother, then climbing to the top of the bell tower at Texas U to kill more people. He later wrote a suicide note and went through with it, saying he was sorry for everything but he couldn't stop himself. He wanted an autopsy performed on his body so doctors could try to find out what was wrong with him. Doctors ended up finding a cancerous tumor inside the hypothalamus region of Charles's brain, pressing down on his amygdala, which is the part of the brain responsible for emotion, behaviour and motivation. Here is a r/crimescene post about the whole event, the situation sounds very similar to what happened in Nevada." The case of Charles Whitman is certainly interesting. https://www.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/74w4od/whats_your_theory_about_stephen_paddock_the_las/
Now that is also a conspiracy theory if I've ever heard one. None of the conspiracy theories explain the security guard ducking in there and shooting people. I would just like to see these videos either DE bunked publicly or acknowledged.
No it's actually not. Just one possible medical reason why a person might become unglued., no one is claiming "many of us know", or even believe, it's true in this case. For it to be a "conspiracy" there would have to be conspirators. Something was wrong with Paddock, no one is claiming to know what. "I would just like to see these videos either DE bunked publicly or acknowledged" You can't "debunk" insanity' and why do the accused have to prove they are telling the truth, as far as they know it. I say the burden of proof is on the accusers, so prove there was a conspiracy, or go back to faked moon landings.
The shooting was not a hoax, it was staged, and those are 2 separate things. That is, it really happened and people really did die, but the events were staged, not spontaneous, and there was a cover-up after the fact.
The video in general terms supports the notion that there were multiple shooters. I had seen that video before, just as I had seen and heard the video from the taxi driver waiting to passengers. There were at least 2 shooters, as Michael Adams proved last year.
If we had some honest and uncompromised law enforcement agencies, we would know the answers to those excellent questions. One does not need to know the answers to all questions in order to understand one has been deceived. At least I don't.
There are people who think there were two shooters. But even if there were, what does that prove exactly? That the nut had a helper? The problem with conspiracy theories is no matter what footage they demand or proofs they receive,they can always ferret out some trivial thing to add to their suspicions. The problem is examined ( rather well, I think), in this article: https://www.dailydot.com/layer8/vegas-security-footage/ "Very often, evidence that disproves the conspiracy is simply folded into the evidence that believers think proves the theory." "And so, the conspiracy theories continue. There are whispers that the reason Paddock had so many guns was that he was involved in some kind of arms deal that went horribly wrong. There are also questions about why Paddock ordered two meals from room service one night before the massacre, which would imply he had an accomplice; or why ISIS took credit for the attack despite no public evidence Paddock had any link to them. The footage doesn’t dispel any of that, nor can it. Ten minutes of footage isn’t going to knock down every conspiracy theory—particularly when the goalposts keep moving, and the standard for “proof” only gets more and more unreachable. It’s entirely possible that the Las Vegas PD is delaying releasing the body camera footage because it would call into question their response to the shooting. And the Mandalay Bay might not want more footage released because it would expose their lax security, which allowed Paddock to bring nearly two dozen guns into their casino. These are entirely pedestrian possibilities that require no conspiracy. But in the absence of an explanation, a conspiracy theory will emerge anyway."
Natural News ... that's some Pulitzer Prize winning **** right there ... I don't know enough about acoustical forensics to be able to determine if this means anything ... perhaps you should contact him and see if he has presented his case to the authorities ... you should definitely write a book E ... tie this all together with Sandy Hook,Aurora, Parkland and all the other false flag nonsense you promote ... you do know that the Pulitzer comes with big bucks right??? ...
Newsbreak for you Shiner--the authorities do not want Adams' acoustical analysis to made public. The authorities are more interested in a brainwashed public. That means the authorities do not seek the truth, or certainly do not want to publicize it. It's good that you admitted your ignorance of acoustical forensics, but I took enough college physics to understand exactly what Adams was pointing out. He's right. Fake News is real. Is that an oxymoron? False stories are what fuel the mainstream media, it is their modus operandi.
If that's breaking news, certainly you have a source for the media covering this up??? ... how many people are in on your diabolical schemes E? ... at least you are entertaining ...
Yes, that we haven't heard more about the case these last 2 years. That makes people think there is a conspiracy.
Looks far off in the distance to me. Seems like a helicopter directly overhead would have had more recordings.