White supremacist Nathan Damigo sucker-punched woman at Trump protest

It's equality Liberals. Time to recognize it for more than just a feel good buzzword.

Woman involves herself with a violent group and takes part in a violent rally...she might get knocked out. Too bad, that's equality.

Don't want to get knocked out, don't be there.


Bunch of Liberals showing their true colors here. they talk about Women and Men being equals, but they know it's not true so now we have to hear them try and play the weak Woman card. Which is it Libs? Good enough to be Marines, but Society has to treat them like lesser beings at the same time?

 

At least no one is denying that the neo nazi POS is a coward.

 

I will remember these words when these so violent lefties and liberals knock out next time a Trump follower...

 

As long as you continue to say he's a neo-nazi and she's a precious innocent angel, you lose all credibility. She was there with sap gloves and had her face covered with a mask. You continue to ignore that. She had a glass bottle. I'm not sure if there's video or photos (ahhh, there is, look at post above, he should've punched her twice.

 

Last I saw this, he was out cold.

 

You do that. And I'll remember many in this thread the next time they jump on their fake "equality" soapbox.

 

Are you denying he will be charged? He ran from across the street to sucker punch a woman, and then the coward ran back to his buddies for protection.

 

He shouldn't have stopped with one punch. She was obviously dangerous throwing bottles at people. I hope she's arrested and charged.

 

You should probably take another look at your weak female angel who was throwing bottles, wearing sap gloves, and a face mask. She should be charged. If anything, he probably protected others from getting hit by her glass bottles. He stopped her.

 

Point to a post where I have call this woman an angel while I assure you the neo nazi POS coward will be charged regardless. The video clearly shows he ran like a coward after the sucker punch. You are defending a POS scum.

 

Funny the people Liberals defend isn't it?
This Violent Woman tossing bottles at people ..Michael Brown... etc. The Left and Thugs, like Peanut Butter and Jelly.

 

"A Woman"......SAP gloves, Bottles and a Mask, willingly participating in a violent protest. She should have a safety bubble from the consequences of her own actions based on genitalia right?

You guys are still stuck in what lost you the election, and I'm happy to see that because it means you're going to keep losing. America is tired of your "cards" and identity politics.
Normal people do not see a "Woman" in this story, they see a violent thug trying to do harm on others.

Keep up the "Woman" card though, I know you can't break the programming.

 

Why does it matter to you that it was a woman? As a group, must we differentiate between woman protesters and male protestors? Why isn't the conversation they? or them? or simply protester? Does your characterization inform us about your own personal misogyny?

 

Sucker punch?

A sucker punch is what happened to the nazi who was being interviewed on tv when an antifa thug(he committed assault, can't do that) punched him from behind. A sucker punch is that poor lady who was being interviewed on live tv and was pepper sprayed from out of nowhere. A sucker punch is what happens in the knock out game.

 

Oh shut it the woman who got punched boasted on face book thar she was going there to attack the free spwwch protrsters.

Please come to a protest I am at and attack me. I will knock everyone if your teeth out.

 

It may not get that far. The ANTIFA/fascists are not nearly as robust and deadly as their 1930s role models. So far its just another 'sound and fury' act - showbiz.

 

I read the LAT article. It references the KKK and the Nazis without any evidence that they were involved. IOW, Fake News.

 

IOW, you are unable to see your own blatant hypocrisy. You should condemn the violent attacks on Trump supporters.

 

I'm with you here, TBH I'm totally lost at this point over the protest itself.

I thought this was a pro trump march and a group of anti-protestors showed up to stop them or at the very least harass them.

Maybe my original assumption was totally wrong.

Given the number of individual altercations going on in that short clip I find it odd that this one individual is being singled out, it looked like an actual riot/brawl, personally if I got stuck in the middle of that mess somehow i'd be heading the other direction at a good speed and i'd try to run over or through or drop a hay-maker at anybody blocking my exit.

Ps... the video revealed absolutely nothing about his "white supremacist" views, I was expecting to see some evidence of an angry white foozebook page or something.

... insert "I am dissapoint meme" here

 

Jesus ****ing christ read *******n it. Shd came at him previously brandishing a deadly weapom wearing gloves desinged specifically for combat that are illegal weapons in California. He responded with less than resonably force in response, pushed her away and disengaged.

Instead of de-escalating as the law requires she re-engaged. if you assult someone with a deadly weapon, they used appropriate force and attempt to disengage, and you cone back you are ****ing lucky you dont get a ****ing double tap. Ge was legally in his right to kill the crazy botch.

 

The part where you NEVER voice it in the threads where the women attacked are Trump supporters.

Your actions do not match your rhetoric as usual.

 

Laughly fake as well. Its beyond pathetic watching the liberals lie about how they would be outraged if women were attacked by anti Trump supporters when its already happened multiple times and they weren't.

 

I've asked for evidence that those are sap gloves and not just fingerless gloves and no one responded. Do you have something? As for the bottle, if that was even the same woman, that was a separate incident. She does not appear to be wielding a bottle in this video.

Not in the video in question. He charged her. He did not "push her away." For the dozenth time, if he was doing so to protect the guy on the ground, that could still be justified.

lol, no. She did not "re-engage" him. He re-engaged her. Which, again, is perfectly justified if she was trying to attack the guy on the ground.

Again, try watching the video. She did not reengage him. She does not appear to be armed in the video.

He was not in his legal right to kill her in the situation in the video. If someone attacks you with a weapon, you don't get to charge them later and kill them later, when they aren't approaching you with a weapon.

 

Where was your outrage when Trump women supporters were attacked and reported in this forum? Talk about massive hypocrisy.