Who killed RFK? His son RFK Jr. doesn’t believe it was Sirhan Sirhan.

ill stick by my conclusion of robert he was a commie socialist in sheep tie and white shirt clothing

 

Coroners do make mistakes. And how do you determine if a bullent fired from behind or in front is what kills you? Simple answer you can't.

 

No, it's not nonsense. A BBC investigation was able to positively identify three CIA officers there the night RFK was killed.

 

This thread meets all the criteria for thread creation in the current events subforum. You just want to censor me and suppress the truth that RFK Jr. is trying to reveal. Just sad.

 

- Rosie Grier doesn't miss tackles

 

There was no mistake. The bullet that killed RFK entered his skull from behind. Sirhan was standing feet in front of RFK. Sirhan was only one of the shooters.

 

The BBC?

Yeah.

The BBC also claimed that John Wilkes Booth didn't shoot Lincoln.

Got any Bigfoot with this thread?

Btw--Why DID you start a DUPLICATE thread?

Just so you could copy/paste the same ridiculous Tinfoil Hat BS in another thread?

No biggie. Just asking.

This thread? =

 

That's a real laugh coming from a whack job like you who insists that everyone investigating the pack of Russian mobsters hovering around Trump are enlisted in a nefarious "Deep State" conspiracy. Is that your high school graduation picture?

 

Oh...the "BBC" was able to "postively identify three CIA officers". PREPOSTEROUS.

And even if such a ridiculous claim were true....SO TF WHAT?

Doesn't change the NONSENSE claims by the alleged coroner...BTW , let's see the OFFICIAL AUTOPSY, not some bullshit form a years later.

What the MDs trying to save his life saw:

As the Good Samaritan surgeons began to clean and explore the Senator’s head wound, they found even greater cause for alarm.
Three bullets had hit the Senator. One grazed his forehead. Another lodged harmlessly in his neck. The third bullet, entering behind the right ear, smashed its way deep into Senator Kennedy’s head, damaged three principal parts of his brain:


From "behind". Really?

Spare me the silliness.

 

If you're so bored by this thread, then why are you so desperate to censor it? And what gives you the right to decide what opinions should be allowed in the Current Events forum? Do you fancy yourself some kind of God?

In any case, this thread meets all the criteria for thread creation in the Current Events subforum. To wit:

The Washington Post reported that JFK Jr. has said that Sirhan Sirhan is innocent. This was reported by The Washington Post on May 26 and has been republished in several mainstream publications since then. It is being discussed all over social media, news networks, and internet forums. This story CLEARLY qualifies as a Current Event, which is why I posted the article in the Current Events subforum. And I made absolutely sure that my thread met all the criteria for thread creation in that subforum. To wit:

1. The thread title was EXACTLY as it appears in the original article.
2. I provided at least a paragraph of respectful elaboration with a minimum of three sentences.
3. The quote I provided from the article is clearly distinguishable from my personal commentary.
4. I only quoted a small portion of the original article.
5. And my thread was clearly sourced with a link that was embedded in the thread title.

I would like other posters to note that "Andrew Jackson" is desperately trying to censor my thread even though it is within the rules of the forum. If this little Stalinist is allowed to censor me, then there is really nothing stopping them from censoring you too.

 

You got this one dead wrong Andrew. Both Kennedy assassinations were professional hits and anyone who has really done the research knows it. You are siding with the biggest moron whack job conspiracy theorist on the board here. Might want to rethink this one.

 

Aww....taking yet, ANOTHER, ASS WHUPPIN' , so now it's time to try to change the subject, Alinsky?


Yeah...RFK was "shot from behind"....


the Good Samaritan surgeons began to clean and explore the Senator’s head wound, they found even greater cause for alarm.
Three bullets had hit the Senator. One grazed his forehead. Another lodged harmlessly in his neck. The third bullet, entering behind the right ear,



Too funny.

 

Apparently the SURGEONS fighting to save his life didn't realize that the forehead is in the back of the head....as is the right ear....


the Good Samaritan surgeons began to clean and explore the Senator’s head wound, they found even greater cause for alarm.
Three bullets had hit the Senator. One grazed his forehead. Another lodged harmlessly in his neck. The third bullet, entering behind the right ear,

 

No, it's not preposterous. A BBC reporter took photographs of men from the night of the assassination and verified their identities with their CIA colleagues.

I already posted a link to the BBC story in my OP. The facts are there. You simply choose to ignore them.

 

Well, once again, I've been censored even though my thread is perfectly consistent with the rules of the Current Events subforum.

Apparently, one poster not liking your thread is enough to get it sent to the most irrelevant and pathetic subforum on the entire website.

This is absolute BULLSH*T.

I've been posting here for YEARS in good standing and this is how I get treated?

 

A flawed "conclusion" that was based on erroneous "acoustic evidence" that was later DEBUNKED.

PS--Shout Out to the PF Mods for moving this thread where it BELONGS:

The CONSPIRACY Section.

Let the Tinfoil Hats run wild.

 

This thread should proceed.

Perhaps it will expose the corruption in the US in such cases, including JFK, RFK, MLK.

The 9/11 Commission Report was the most pathetic excuse of a whitewash controlled by Bush and Cheney.

In all of those cases, the most appropriate suspects will be those in the involved agencies who were promoted after the event with no evidence their promotion was merited.

 

That's right champ. The fatal shot was fired from no more than three inches and more likely point blank from behind. Ever heard the old phrase, stick one in his ear? That's how a pro does it. In the confusion the security guard knowing Sirhan was about to cause total chaos came up from behind and stuck one in his ear, then blended into the crowd. Caesar just happened to be carrying a .22 caliber pistol. I have never seen or heard of an armed security guard carrying a .22. However, the old .22 is the favorite weapon for close range assassins.

 

GRAZED his forehead. You know what GRAZED means, right?

BEHIND the right ear. You know what BEHIND means, right?

Your OWN ARTICLE clearly states that the bullet that entered BEHIND his ear caused him to DIE.

If you cannot even grasp basic English, then what the hell are you doing trying to debate me?

 

This thread meets ALL the guidelines for thread creation in the Current Events subforums. I am being BLATANTLY censored.

 

It was the bullet that hit the mastoid bone.
That thick, porous bone that knobs out behind your ear.
It was fragments from that shattered bone that was the death blow.
Had the bullet hit any other cranium bone, that lethal shattering effect would not have happened.
Where as JFK's autopsy was barely a page long, RFK's was a phone book.
The Kennedy family was very upset with the L.A. coroner, Thomas Noguchi.
He is most famous for performing autopsies on Marilyn Monroe, Robert F. Kennedy, Sharon Tate, Gia Scala, William Holden, Natalie Wood, and John Belushi.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Noguchi

I got mine.​

Not a picture of Moi

 

And, of course, the second this thread is sent to the conspiracy theory subforum, people stop reading it and stop posting in it. Andrew Jackson, the little Stalinist, has succeeded in censoring me even though the thread is not against the forum rules.

 

Another moronic post. Kennedy like his brother Jack was a huge anti communist. He served as council for McCarthy. Pick up a book someday champ. Your ignorance is showing.

 

Don't even bother. The thread is dead, killed by Andrew Jackon's attempts to censor the truth. This subforum shouldn't even exist. It's only purpose is to facilitate arbitrary suppression of certain viewpoints.

 

Well sir, I don't really think that many on this board will change their minds about anything. However, if a couple of Kennedy's kids have the guts to go on camera and educate the people of this country, it certainly might make a difference. I know that Sturgis and Barker are already dead and Eugenio Martinez is 93. I hope it's safe for them to speak out.