actually it is you who completely missed the point and what I said is directly related to this thread unless your post was off topic in the first place? Do you understand now?
Oh, what Bull(*)(*)(*)(*). You pulled my quote entirely out of context to construct an irrelevance. Please return to the theme of this thread or take your nonsense elsewhere.
you are the one who is claiming physics is a democracy and I take issue with that. Its a ridiculous strawman that you own. Do I need to quote it for you? Dont blame me for your diversions and dont expect me to be silent about your errors.
Yes, please quote it because you are lying. I never stated that physics was a democracy, so you can quit the strawman bull(*)(*)(*)(*). I haven't made any errors and please keep to the topic. If you don't like the topic don't participate in the thread, and if you keep trolling you will be reported.
This guy has been posting his analysis of building seven all over the internet. He's eating the pro-official version posters for lunch. http://www.freethought-forum.com/forum/showthread.php?t=29006
No, he doesn't have much of a clue regarding the subject. Scott, without a video, can you tell me why free-fall was exceeded at the 12 second mark in the collapse sequence for 2.25 seconds?
Architects and engineers for 911 truth represent neither a majority nor do they represent architects or engineers. They are merely conspiracy buffs with a website. What you missed is that science and evidence proves all of their claims false. Shared beliefs of a few or many means nothing
Listen to the experts. http://www1.ae911truth.org/news-sec...-and-building-7-on-911-by-david-chandler.html Tom Sullivan - Explosives Technician - Loader - AE911Truth.org https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u5IgqJXyLbg Architects & Engineers - Solving the Mystery of WTC 7 - AE911Truth.org https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZMEHc14IWf4 The Death of Controlled Demolition Expert Danny Jowenko after Speaking about 9/11 WTC 7 Building 7 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-zHHvo6U4lA September 11 -- The New Pearl Harbor (FULL) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8DOnAn_PX6M (2:40:20 time mark) Building 7 - Sound Evidence for Explosions (10 min) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tlRmaUCE8sM WTC7 in Freefall: No Longer Controversial https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rVCDpL4Ax7I
There are not nor has there ever been 2200 architects and engineers who have stated any such opinion as you claim or signed any petition.
None of that infantile BS answered my question. So, no-one can explain why free-fall was exceeded for 2.25 seconds at the 12.5 second mark? This is important and 9/11 truth doesn't know why.
Its pretty tough to debate posers because they dont have enough subject matter familiarity to recognize when they have had their butts handed to them much less understand the engineering content in those video clips that destroys the official story!
Thanks Koko We might as well just post stuff for the viewers to check out. There's no sense in trying to reach someone whose mind is already made up. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Invincible_ignorance_fallacy https://www.google.es/#q=The+NIST+Analyses+-+A+Close+Look+at+WTC+7+pdf http://www1.ae911truth.org/en/news-...-and-building-7-on-911-by-david-chandler.html http://www1.ae911truth.org/en/news-...foreknowledge-of-building-7s-destruction.html
There could be many reasons for the demolition. Trying to get an accurate explanation for that is just a way to distract from what we're actually saying. That being that the official story is full of holes. Us not knowing the exact reasons isn't some sort of "gotcha" moment. Here's what we do know. The tenants for the building included the CIA, IRS, Department of Defense, Secret Service, and several financial institutions including the Securities and Exchange Commission which at that time happened to be ramping up their investigation into Enron and other companies. Beyond that, we can speculate all we want but there won't be any shortage of what you can come up with with this combination of tenants. And while some of you say that it would be easier to just delete files or to shred papers, look at what's happening to Hillary right now. Destroying the building ensures the destruction of any evidence of whatever may have been in there. One other thing of note. The WTC was a money loser because of the way the buildings were built. The new buildings are all glass exterior and heavily focussed on low energy consumption. Buildings 3-6 were all so badly damaged (note that none of them collapsed) that destroying building 7 would allow for the entire center to be rebuilt by Larry Silverstein who got all that insurance money. Not one of the 7 new buildings has a design like the old buildings. Before you jump down my throat, I'm not saying this one issue proves anything by itself, but it's worth keeping in mind. Silverstein's acquisition of the buildings and taking out an insurance policy covering terrorism just months before the attacks is awfully coincidental. And then fighting to get double the money because there were two attacks. And since we're talking building 7, there's that line of his where he says they "pulled it". If you want the science behind the collapse of the building, here's a great presentation from Architects and Engineers: 9/11: Blueprint for Truth http://youtu.be/OQgVCj7q49o
There investigation into Enron was not stopped or even slower down by 911. Having government offices in the wtc is meaningless. Silverstein's famous quite referred to the fire fighters and means nothing . " pull it " has never been a term used in demolitions. The video you link to is devoid of any scientific accuracy and has long been discussed and proven fiction in many of these threads. Twoofers consistently watch TV and think it teaches them science making them all einsteins. The twoofers videos are entertainment with as much evidence facts and science as a Tom and Jerry cartoon. Like all who claim that the official story is full of holes you absolutely FAIL to point out any such holes.
Proven by you? Yes, let's ignore the evidence brought forth by thousands of independent architects and engineers because Soupnazi proved to himself that the science is bogus. Watch the material and you'll see. I can't hold your hand.
Evidently you're going to have to,I've watched scott/cosmored/fatfreddy88/david c's videos as well as others ad nauseam and all I see is supposition,lies and appeals to authority... NOT 'holes'
There are not and never has been thousands of such architects and engineers claiming what you describe. That material is very old and has been watched by me and many others repeatedly it has been proven fiction - - - Updated - - - No that is your repeated assertions which have no supporting evidence
