Woman who claimed Justice Kavanaugh raped her now admits they’ve never even met.

Discussion in 'United States' started by US Conservative, Nov 2, 2018.

  1. Bush Lawyer

    Bush Lawyer Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2018
    Messages:
    15,035
    Likes Received:
    9,493
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    You'll have to explain that.
     
  2. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    153,338
    Likes Received:
    39,002
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    You didn't listen to Ford's testimony?

    Ford testified she went to the party at this home she can't identify that was at least 6 miles up to 15 miles from her home, at night. She testified that after the alleged assault she snuck down the stairs and out the house and went home. She has never explained how she got home. So what we are to believe is that she and her best friend are at this party, Ford goes upstairs with two boys, the two boys come back downstairs and Ford disappears. We are to believe her friend didn't ask these boys where is my BFF, that when Ford did not come back down the stairs her BFF didn't go upstairs to make sure she was alright, that when her BFF discovered she is not in the house she didn't get the least bit concerned, didn't worry a bit, didn't go outside and look for her, just kept partying and went home without her without giving a moments thought as to WHAT THE HELL HAPPENED TO HER. Did not worry she had no way home, she came with her. That she must be walking strange streets not knowing where she was or how to get home. That they didn't go to Ford's house to make sure she got home or tell her parents that she was missing. That she didn't lie restlessly in her bed all night not knowing what happened to her BFF and didn't even try to find her the next day to ask her what happened only to be relieved that somehow she did manage to get home safe. That throughout their lifelong BFF relationship she has never asked Ford what did happen that night, that Ford wouldn't have TOLD HER THAT NIGHT, but left her there with those boys.

    I find that entirely incredulous but do explain why you do not.

    Yes put me in front a jury with that story.
     
    Last edited: Nov 5, 2018
  3. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    153,338
    Likes Received:
    39,002
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    My whole argument has been based on the facts and history which you cannot refute. What illegally obtained evidence to be ignored? He submitted a false affidavit into a federal court, that is prima facie evidence of perjury and obstruction of justice. How was that evidence "illegally obtained"?
     
    Last edited: Nov 5, 2018
  4. Bush Lawyer

    Bush Lawyer Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2018
    Messages:
    15,035
    Likes Received:
    9,493
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male

    Then I guess you need to ask those you are referring to.
     
  5. ibobbrob

    ibobbrob Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2017
    Messages:
    12,744
    Likes Received:
    3,136
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Except that I heard him say it. Must have been my imagination, aye wot? And I guess all 19 women are liars too. All of 'em.
     
  6. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    153,338
    Likes Received:
    39,002
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    They were, the party never happened.

    so I'm asking you what was credulus about Ford's story?
     
    Last edited: Nov 5, 2018
  7. Paul7

    Paul7 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2012
    Messages:
    15,854
    Likes Received:
    11,608
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The funny thing is the Dems who believe these lying women want to impeach Kavanaugh when the Constitution says he can only be impeached for acts while in office. He could have permitted perjury or raped someone before he was on the SCOTUS and they can't lay a glove on him, LOL......
     
  8. Bush Lawyer

    Bush Lawyer Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2018
    Messages:
    15,035
    Likes Received:
    9,493
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Nothing in particular, just as here was nothing in particular credulous in what Bart said.
     
  9. Giftedone

    Giftedone Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2010
    Messages:
    63,710
    Likes Received:
    13,466
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Already explained to you .. go back to the post where "fruit of the poisoned tree" is explained and respond if you wish to continue.

    And clearly you do not know what "Prima Facie" means = "On the surface".
     
  10. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    18,909
    Likes Received:
    3,589
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No you did not hear him say it

    Quite him and it proves you wrong
     
  11. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    153,338
    Likes Received:
    39,002
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Only supported by all the other witnesses. What was incredulous about what he said happened?
     
    Ddyad likes this.
  12. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    153,338
    Likes Received:
    39,002
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    WHAT ILLEGALLY OBTAINED EVIDENCE.................you have yet to show a shred of illegally obtained evidence or any illegal act by the FBI or DOJ or OIC.

    Actually "on the face of it" as in submitting a false affidavit which is prima facie evidence of perjury and obstruction of justice. There was no defense to the charge. It was NOT a witch hunt as you have claimed.

    And still waiting
    Where was Reno "out of line"?
     
    Last edited: Nov 5, 2018
  13. chingler

    chingler Banned at Members Request

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2018
    Messages:
    4,283
    Likes Received:
    1,924
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    BULLSHIT AND YOU KNOW IT.

    go ahead and quote me. i DARE you. quote my post in which i claim sick billy was impeached for rape as you fallaciously claim.
     
  14. Bush Lawyer

    Bush Lawyer Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2018
    Messages:
    15,035
    Likes Received:
    9,493
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    No...his evidence was not supported by other witnesses at all. My concern is not that Blasey Ford made allegations, rather it is the conduct of Bart before that Committee which in my view renders him as not worthy of SCOTUS.
     
  15. Giftedone

    Giftedone Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2010
    Messages:
    63,710
    Likes Received:
    13,466
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Why do you keep asking for information that has already been provided ? Now go back to the post where I answer your questions and either respond to what I said or shut up por favor.
     
  16. Giftedone

    Giftedone Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2010
    Messages:
    63,710
    Likes Received:
    13,466
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I did not say you said that Slick willy was impeached for rape.

    I have no idea why you were bringing the rape claimants up when they had no bearing on what was being discussed ? Trolling perhaps ?
     
  17. chingler

    chingler Banned at Members Request

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2018
    Messages:
    4,283
    Likes Received:
    1,924
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    then what the hell am i “backtracking” on?

    more BS from you...

    “You seemed to be having trouble understanding that the other rape allegations had nothing to do with Clinton being prosecuted for perjury”
     
    Last edited: Nov 5, 2018
    ChoppedLiver likes this.
  18. Giftedone

    Giftedone Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2010
    Messages:
    63,710
    Likes Received:
    13,466
    Trophy Points:
    113
    If you did not have trouble understanding that the rape allegations had nothing to do with Clinton being prosecuted for perjury - why the heck did you keep asking "are you saying prosecuting known rapist bill clinton was a witch hunt?"
     
  19. chingler

    chingler Banned at Members Request

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2018
    Messages:
    4,283
    Likes Received:
    1,924
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    “known rapist” is a descriptor. it describes one of the factual characteristics of the man. at no time did i claim it was in any way material to his impeachment which was, as i stated clearly, for perjury.
     
  20. glloydd95

    glloydd95 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2010
    Messages:
    1,919
    Likes Received:
    424
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Lol...I will say it. She was lying. I don't think she necessarily wanted to but when the president didn't retract Judge Kavanaugh's nomination after Feinstein's fake allegation letter, the ante had to be upped. A letter had to be produced and someone had to made known as it's author and victim.

    None of it ever happened. It was composed like fiction. No hard facts about the where and when were included because then a defense could be mounted and facts checked. When the desired effect did not happen, democrats went out and found anyone who was willing to lie for the cause.

    It is all B.S.
     
    Last edited: Nov 5, 2018
  21. Giftedone

    Giftedone Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2010
    Messages:
    63,710
    Likes Received:
    13,466
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Since the topic being discussed was Clinton's impeachment "The witch hunt" - why did you bring it up if it was not "material" to the conversation ?
     
  22. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    153,338
    Likes Received:
    39,002
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    He never made that claim why do you keep asserting he did?
     
  23. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    153,338
    Likes Received:
    39,002
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I already refuted you fallacious answers. Now what illegal evidence are you talking about and how was Reno "out of line"?
    And be specific.
     
  24. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    153,338
    Likes Received:
    39,002
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    It most certainly was and his conduct was most appropriate to the baseless allegations the Democrats were making in an effort to falsely smear him.
     
  25. Giftedone

    Giftedone Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2010
    Messages:
    63,710
    Likes Received:
    13,466
    Trophy Points:
    113
    What Fallacy ? You are making things up again. Don't blame me that you can not figure out what "fruit of the poisoned tree" is - despite having it explained to you a number of times.
     

Share This Page