World Implications if NASA Finally Admits to Life on Mars

Discussion in 'Other/Miscellaneous' started by Don Townsend, Nov 21, 2013.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

  1. Don Townsend

    Don Townsend New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,357
    Likes Received:
    12
    Trophy Points:
    0
    When the President and NASA in the near future are holding that National News Conference announcing the discovery of past and present humanoid life on Mars , I want all of you trolls to remember these little communiques we've had. HE WHO LAUGHS LAST , LAUGHS BEST !

    Eratosthenis in 200 B.C. was the first to calculate the earth's circumference. If he were alive today and posting his finding for the first time, It's people like you that would be saying ,"Yeah right , ya gotta link for that , where did ya get that off YouTube. Ya got any real experts to back that B. S .up Eratosthenis., you CONSPIRICY THEORIST. I believe the Government they say the world is flat.
     
  2. X-ray Spex

    X-ray Spex Active Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2011
    Messages:
    1,014
    Likes Received:
    15
    Trophy Points:
    38
    OK, we'll be waiting for that press conference. Any day now we're sure!

    And when that happens, we'll be the first in line to congratulate you and say, "Yeah, you told us so. We were wrong and you were right." You can whack us upside the head with a rolled-up newspaper too!
     
  3. Don Townsend

    Don Townsend New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,357
    Likes Received:
    12
    Trophy Points:
    0
    It's going to be sooner than you think. The evidence is piling up .Obama won't even give a straight out denial when asked about life on Mars now. He's evasive and won't answer it.
     
  4. snakestretcher

    snakestretcher Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2010
    Messages:
    43,996
    Likes Received:
    1,706
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Give it up Don. Didn't you maintain in another-or this-thread, that there's no evidence that the Earth is a globe?
     
  5. OverDrive

    OverDrive Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 21, 2009
    Messages:
    11,990
    Likes Received:
    77
    Trophy Points:
    48
    As in 'pear shaped?'
     
  6. snakestretcher

    snakestretcher Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2010
    Messages:
    43,996
    Likes Received:
    1,706
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It's actually an oblate spheroid, so you're nearly right!
     
  7. OverDrive

    OverDrive Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 21, 2009
    Messages:
    11,990
    Likes Received:
    77
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Or, oblate ellipsoid...I have Wiki too. [​IMG]

    What did he claim?
     
  8. snakestretcher

    snakestretcher Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2010
    Messages:
    43,996
    Likes Received:
    1,706
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Simply that there was no evidence that it was a globe. Discworld, perhaps? Oh, and we haven't been to the Moon either, apparently.
     
  9. OverDrive

    OverDrive Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 21, 2009
    Messages:
    11,990
    Likes Received:
    77
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Discworld--sounds like flat earth..or a fantasy book series?

    So, the 'earth rise as seen from the moon' pic is CGI before they had CGI?
     
  10. snakestretcher

    snakestretcher Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2010
    Messages:
    43,996
    Likes Received:
    1,706
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yes indeed, and the author also has an extraordinary imagination. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discworld
     
  11. OverDrive

    OverDrive Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 21, 2009
    Messages:
    11,990
    Likes Received:
    77
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Now finally something that makes sense:

    " Discworld, a flat disc balanced on the backs of four elephants which, in turn, stand on the back of a giant turtle,"

    And I guess all those hours I sat b4 the TV in 1969 taking pics with high-speed film of the landing was just a masterful conspiracy by a relatively 'low-tech' Govt, huh? Ppl do know that the avg desktop PC has more power than the Apollo capsule did.
     
  12. Don Townsend

    Don Townsend New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,357
    Likes Received:
    12
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Nice try to discredit someone who's kickin your hiney
     
  13. Don Townsend

    Don Townsend New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,357
    Likes Received:
    12
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I don't know what you boys are talking about. I never had a thread or posted anything about the shape of the earth. although I have always agreed with conventional thinking, I've always assumed it was am sphere whether it's a perfect sphere I don't know nor is it relevant as I have not addressed this point until it was mentioned here in a feeble attempt to discredit my undisputable facts. Now, am I going to be required to POST A LINK, QUOTE A ,P.H.D. , OR HAVE 2 WITNESSES TO PROVE MY STATEMENT like you seem to require with all my other posts. I guess NASA photographs that anyone in the world can download and see the same exact things isn't proof enough for the trolls on here whose main objective is to keep a lid on the truth !
     
  14. OverDrive

    OverDrive Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 21, 2009
    Messages:
    11,990
    Likes Received:
    77
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Having been around cameras all my life, even the old manual SLR's, and understanding lighting and contrast, why didnt the folks at NASA do a 'complete' job and add 'stars' to their fake pics? Missed a 'minor' detail?

    - - - Updated - - -

    Having been around cameras all my life, even the old manual SLR's, and understanding lighting and contrast, why didnt the folks at NASA do a 'complete' job and add 'stars' to their fake pics? Missed a 'minor' detail?
     
  15. Don Townsend

    Don Townsend New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,357
    Likes Received:
    12
    Trophy Points:
    0


     
  16. X-ray Spex

    X-ray Spex Active Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2011
    Messages:
    1,014
    Likes Received:
    15
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Now this is really incredible. You have gotten us into the remarkable position that Obama is correct. He probably won't answer to why they can read your thoughts even with your tin-foil hat on either.
     
  17. Bowerbird

    Bowerbird Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2009
    Messages:
    98,548
    Likes Received:
    78,378
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    That is because you tube has considerably less ethical and truth standard than a Bangladeshi Advertising Agency. There are no restrictions on what people post on you tube and an awful are posted to see who they can sucker in.

    Sort of like the "conspiracy theory" relating to the so called "Di-hydrogen Monoxide" that THESE people maintain is poisoning the Earth
    http://www.dhmo.org
     
  18. Don Townsend

    Don Townsend New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,357
    Likes Received:
    12
    Trophy Points:
    0
    These people analyzing these NASA PHOTOS are finding the same anomalies all over the world you can go to the NASA SITE and see the same dam ancient fossils ,statues, carved stones ETC,ETC ETC ETC. I guess people all over the world are in a conspiracy to manipulate these photos all in the exact same way. NOW, WHO IS THE CONSPIRACY NUT!!
     
  19. smallblue

    smallblue Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2013
    Messages:
    4,382
    Likes Received:
    570
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Some people just can't handle YouTube.
     
  20. Bowerbird

    Bowerbird Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2009
    Messages:
    98,548
    Likes Received:
    78,378
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    But who are "these people" and how do you know that they are NASA PHOTOS and if they are there on the NASA site why did you not link to the NASA site?

    Did you know you can google images?

    When you do take note of which sites are hosting them because there are some notorious conspiracy sites out there who really do think DHMO is a world wide problem
     
  21. Don Townsend

    Don Townsend New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,357
    Likes Received:
    12
    Trophy Points:
    0
    NASA.COM
     
  22. Bowerbird

    Bowerbird Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2009
    Messages:
    98,548
    Likes Received:
    78,378
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    If you cannot link to the images in question I will consider this a major fail as in "look Ma! NASA gone done found themselves a Zipper on Mars!!

    [​IMG]
     
  23. snakestretcher

    snakestretcher Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2010
    Messages:
    43,996
    Likes Received:
    1,706
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Zipper? Pah! Those are clearly concrete sections of a drainage system. I know they are, the voices told me.
     
  24. Bowerbird

    Bowerbird Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2009
    Messages:
    98,548
    Likes Received:
    78,378
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    [​IMG]

    couldn't resist
     
  25. ringotuna

    ringotuna Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2013
    Messages:
    2,502
    Likes Received:
    37
    Trophy Points:
    48
    do you mean Nasa.gov?

    and another question, if NASA were hiding the existence of humanoid life on Mars, why would they publish photo's of the very life forms they are denying? Could it be that, like most analysts and reasonable viewers, they know they're just rocks?
     

Share This Page