Zimmerman Trial (Thurs. July 11th) MOD ALERT

The "uniter" is really a divider as most of the Leftists are. They don't want unity and everyone trying to be the best that they can be. They want a huge nanny state, racial, class, and sexual strife, and total ideological political victory.

 

Come on. Are you really gonna hold that against him? There are many foreseeable reasons why an obviously innocent person would take the 5th.

 

She was asking George and informing him of his rights to avoid some crap on appeal. You don't understand court procedure. LOLOL I swear...

 

Translation: State knows that they utterly FAILED to make their case.

 

No, there really wasn't anything material to clarify. The police said they beleived he was telling the truth and they only prosecuted because of external pressure. They (prosecution witnesses) also testified that his story was consistent on material points. he made the right call.

 

What? You do realize that what you're referring to - common law - existed well before the constitution?

 

One can hope there will be at least one of them who can see and effectively argue what we (sentients ) on this forum can see.

 

Who would have ever thought I'd agree with a grokmaster post? Not I.

 

She was clearly out of line badgering him and pressuring him teh way she did. Even YOU should be able to see that.

 

Back to the completely madeup BULLCRAP again, we see, from the Miraculous Trayvonite Mind Reader...

 

I don't know too many women who would've taken off in the darkness looking for someone they claim they were afraid of.

 

We'll see about that!!!

 

I'm not sure if you can pick and choose which questions you can plead the 5th when taking the stand and swearing to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth ...

 

It is not unusual for a judge to ask the defendant if he or she intends to take the 5th.

 

It will become known as "being Zimmermaned".

 

"Forward" to "fundamental transformation" dies on the vine without it.

 

All of them, actually. But he's not taking the stand so I don't understand your point.

 

As I said.. you don't understand the Judge's obligations.

 

Another dodge of a direct question!

- - - Updated - - -

As I said, she went well beyond them. I know far more than you do apparently!

 

This judge's obligation appears to be getting a guilty verdict...

 

Your right, because he would have never found him "suspicious" and would have gone on to Target.

Well if he had given a well-deserved thug a dirt knap I wouldn't have had a problem with it either.

Yea black racism is what killed him. Unbelievable.

- - - Updated - - -

How many women would have been in that situation?

 

Yet another dodge. You don't have the right to ask follow up questions until you answer the initial one.

- - - Updated - - -

There is no question she displayed annimosity toward the Defense that she did not toward the persecution.

 

I was just wondering why Zimmy didn't take the stand ... juries get skeptical when a defendant doesn't.

 

how absolutely hilarious, thank you again for proving you have no idea what you are talking about...CUTS ON THE BACK OF THE HEAD, no matter how minor or serious indicate 2 things, Zimmerman was either mounted and his head being bashed into something OR that he was attacked from behind....which do want to roll with? Either way it puts Trayvon in the aggressor role. Thanks for playing.

 

Defendants hardly ever take the stand.