LoL I've provided my own defense in both civil and criminal court. Your own incredulity notwithstanding, they proved that the towers collapsed the way they did by using science. They didn't just make (*)(*)(*)(*) up on a whim and see if it would play out. They had teams, literally hundreds, of scientists working on the NIST report. If you think they are pathetic enough to skew a report just because the government asks them too, I think you might need help. Yes, and they DID do that. Then it was peer reviewed, and proven to be factual by Purdue, MIT, etc. The reason it's boring you to death is because you are the only one that sees this "doubt". Everyone else is, literally, laughing at the fact that, what you describe as doubt, is really just incredulity. Yes I can, there are several pictures of other steel buildings failing. Some even have videos! Hell, take 8 seconds and google "WTC 6 Steel". It'll show you a picture of a building that had less fire than the WTC and all the steel is sagging in the building. That's it, it's that easy and you refuse or are too inept to do it. You have no idea what you're talking about, and it's as plain as the nose on my face.
I think I used the word sufficient. If you were a lawyer you would have been quiet a long time ago. How far I got through the nist report regardless if it all the way, read 10 times or not at all is completely irrellevant. Pilot huh? then you must love the way those 767 can be flown by remote eh?
It is very, very relevant. How far did you get through the official hypothesis of the NIST reports before you decided it was "impossible"? You must love the way you pull nonsense like this from your hind-end.
Oh I have lots of idea about what I am talking about. Dont cry to us that you are a plain jane. Oh btw did you see the invincible plane yet? what do you think since you are a pilot lets pick up a plane and go into the demolition biz together
Avoiding the questions in this thread too koko. Boy you are just dancing all over the place. 1. How far did you get through the NIST report before you decided that its hypothesis was "impossible".
Sorry man had I known it was going to be pivotal to your argument I would have kept an ongoing record. Besides if I did, it would most likely be classified because that information might jeopardize public safety.
Still dancing. Answer the question. 1. How far did you get through the NIST report before you decided that its hypothesis was "impossible".
Point was made 2 page ago. You call for evidence to support the official collapse hypothesis, I linked you a very comprehensive report of which you claim its conclusions were "impossible". I want to know how much you read before you came to your conclusion. Your unwillingness to answer this simple question makes it transparent you never even read the report. And so my point is, you are arguing from ignorance, willful ignorance, and nothing more you say will be taken seriously by me or anyone.
Failed vernage LOL Hmm vernage does not seem to work too good for tall buildings, well except the wtc accrding to the troughers
Did I? LoL haha, you're so good at this hehe rofl. Actually, you're part right. I won my criminal case because they tried to pass a good faith search off when they had no grounds. The civil court I lost, but I knew I was going too. Hiring a lawyer, especially one with your "credentials", wouldn't have helped me. Quit talking like you know (*)(*)(*)(*), you don't. Unsubstantiated ramblings? Yessir, may I have another. Care to source this? Or just the normal making stuff up? K thanks. Judging by the comments on this thread, one of us haven't, but it isn't me. Maybe you just don't understand it? I'm not doing your research because you're too ignorant or inept to do it. Hi Pot... Evidence that women stay as far away from you as possible. I can't, we're hiding it in the NWO\Shill safe. If we release it you guys will know that it was a CD...er, I mean, it's...uh. Nope, just 96% of Earth's population able to understand the information, evidence, and science in order to realize that there was no CD on 9/11. Once again, I've gone through great lengths to post information here. I'm not wasting more of my time doing your research because you're too ignorant or inept to handle it yourself. You're so deep in your delusional world that it wouldn't even make a difference. You'll handwave it away anyway.
Good solution! as much egg as you people end up with on your face the last thing you want to do is research! LMAO
It is time to move on to the BIG PICTURE...... No need to try an prove to the fruit loops....... They are all a deliberate distraction that you are feeding quite well........... 911 was from within...... The only question in your mind now, should be, WHO?
I must say...my compliments to the organizer of this fine forum. Everything is well under control. Great job everyone.
gave you p[lenty of answers, not my problem you arein capable of understanding. run away? Unlike some here (you) I have a life LOL
You gave attempts at derail, not answers. You are yet to explain why molten metal and large fires in the debris pile supports your conspiracy theory and not the official narrative. Got an answer yet?
