You think wrong. I know that if I sit a 1kg brick on a glass table, it will sit there for a hundred years no problem. If I take the same 1kg brick, hold it 2 feet above the table and drop, it will smash the **** out of it. Now imagine if by brick weighted 500,000,000 kg? Dynamic load, simple, but yet it escapes you.
I sort of get the impression cj was not too happy with my response. I guess I was supposed to agree or something.
Okay, that's done. I imagined it. Now what? What does a .00000000000kg brick have to do with the amount of energy in the WTC, the difference between dynamic and static load, or the price of tea in China?
you know its a violation of the tos to modify quotes - - - Updated - - - Nothing to be concerned about only troughers are complaining. They should be complaining to their school boards, not here.
Nothing to be concerned about only troughers are complaining. They should be complaining to their school boards, not here.
I don't think I've ever seen someone avoid and dodge their own points like koko does. What a spectacle.
stop whining just because I do not chase every strawman you people put up lol debate in an orderly manner and you will have better luck.
It's your own strawmans you keep running from. Hit and run with everything you do. You say something, I provide proof you are incorrect. You say my proof is not valid, so I ask for evidence that invalidates. You run away, change the subject, and accuse me of failing to produce evidence. Rinse and repeat.
nope I say something you reply with a strawman I take it back to something you cry that I do not respond to your strawman, Just like hannibal and fang provides proof. (off point) you want me to prove your claim for you then you claim I run away nothing new here