The Silent War Against The White Race.

not necessarily. depends on how you present those statistics. i have no problem if they're presented in a non-hateful manner. But every time you present statistics, it's always enveloped in a larger attitude of racism and hate.

Yes, but god-believing people, like whites, are the dominant group in this society. As such, they do not need protection or special consideration. You simply don't listen, do you?

It's the same reason why it's ok for blacks to make race jokes about white people, but not ok for white people to make race jokes about blacks. Whites are not the same as blacks.

 

Jewish Americans make up just over 2% of the population of the United States (approximately 5.5 million) but American Jews are in greater danger of disappearing through assimilation and intermarriage and they have the lowest birth rate of any religious or ethnic community (1.4 children per household). The Jewish population in the US declined by 5% in the 1990s and 54% of all American Jewish children under the age of 18 are being raised as non-Jews or with no religion.

 

and yet, Jews dominate in nearly every segment of American life. From law to politics to business to medicine to entertainment. Moral of the story - It's not always about how many babies you make.

 

You unknowingly compromised your own position. You just said in your own words that racism was okay in a reverse-minority position. Meaning that you aren't for "equality" at all, or "fairness".

You feel as though "Whitey" has to pay. Well, we did pay. The continent has collapsed in a literal pile of rubble. Our State Governments are bankrupt. My own city government is millions of dollars in the red. How much more must America pay? Integrate? Before you're satisfied?

 

Your argument at many times during tonight's conversation was basically "you're right, but you shouldn't say it! It's offensive!" "Hateful" is just a subjective term, and in your case, includes anything that may offend someone, even if its true.

LOL, this goofy conflict theory hypocrisy is amusing. So it's open season on the majority. They don't need protection. You guys are free to be as offensive, discriminatory, and racist as you want, all while expecting the majority to not be offensive, discriminatory, and racist towards anybody.

You know you guys are raving hypocrites, right?

 

My comments were in response to Brewskier's assertion that he's like to go up to a black person and say, to his face, that black culture is inferior and is the reason why so many blacks are lazy criminals. I'm sorry, but that's hate speech.

Violence only comes from those who refuse to be tolerant. In any case, the genie is out of the bottle, and you can't put it back in. Eventually, gays will gain acceptance. It's already happening.

I support gay marriages, but don't think churches should be required to marry gays.

WTF? Lots of people protest all the time about all sorts of things. Not sure why you're singling out gays.

animalistic or not, it's wrong. Not only should you not hate them, you should learn to accept gays.

I'm with you on the Latino question. we should reduce illegal immigration, and increase legal immigration (namely skilled workers to fill tech jobs). Most of these will probably come from Asia.
Not sure what you mean by "new-leftism." Lefties have espoused the same views and have been consistent in these views for decades. What has changed is not the left, but rather the new radialism on the right, starting with the tea-party movement and re-assertion of "libertarianism." "Neo-rightism", if you want to call it that.

 

They act as if whites need to be victimized for a set period of time, and then after that is over, everyone will dust themselves off, shake hands, and then sing together in an egalitarian utopia. The truth is, these people will always scapegoat whites, even after whites become minorities in their own countries. It's not about being against the majority. They are against whites.

 

On the contrary.

As a collective group, they are the most highly ethno centric and narcissistic of all people, and have no peers in that regard.

There is NO denial of this fact, even if you wish you roll out your Woody Allen 'Self hating Jew' thing.

 

You need to understand that there are different ways of conveying the same truth. You can convey truth, without coming across as a racist. You clearly don't have an appreciation of that.

I never said that minorities can be as offensive as they want--everything has boundaries (for example, no one should ever say "white babies should die"--that would be crossing the line). But yes, you are the majority. You have all the advantages. Just enjoy your majority status quietly, please. I am tired of hearing your fake victimization.

- - - Updated - - -

don't disagree with that--well, maybe Koreans are also up there. But Koreans have no power in society, so I give them a pass.

 

Shall we have a Jewish duel over it ? Argue

 

New-Leftism is the category of the 1960's Democrats(such as Obama's beloved New Black Panther party for example), Feminism rose at about this time and basically every other failed idea(you yourself have attested that many of these ideas are miserable failures) came from this group. This group of young activists are now our head of states and political politicians. There's never been a greater representative of incompetence at the most important helm in history, ever.

You've also shown a lack of political awareness in calling "Libertarianism" a far-right theory. The Founders at their time were Liberals(in a much softer sense then the word now denotes the forementioned 60's group of fools). The Republic itself for 100 years was our proud continent.

The slippery slope began with good intentions, and then degraded to this pitiful state of affairs. If I'm to say anything however, it would be this:
I don't believe the Republic can be held today.

I don't believe an effective government can come from a hands-off approach(Libertarianism), indeed, history has evidenced that leadership is a special quality and that few men and women through history were destined to become leaders.

I support formerly making this continent an Empire, we're no different from the British in our proud legacy and we must use this transformative downfall to our ultimate advantage.

 

Based on nothing more than your objective opinion on what is "racist". The truth is the truth. You can sugar coat it to your liking.

Your anti-white sentiment shines through. Keep making excuses for groups who can't succeed even when society bends over backwards to help them. At some point, you got to call a losing team a loser.

 

I am for fairness, but I am not for "equality for all." Equality for all is impossible, since different races are fundamentally different, based on their position and relative dominance in society. You can't treat all races the same, cause all races are NOT the same. But I am for fairness. And sometimes, "reverse racism" is the fair thing to do, to try and balance out the white-dominated racism that is inherent in our society.

It's not about "paying." It's about fairness. Whites currently enjoy advantages over blacks. So by giving blacks some advantages of their own, it neutralizes some of the white advantages.

And stop being so dramatic. America is doing alright. It would be doing better had the conservatives not boggled us down with their obsession with austerity. But In any case, it's undeniable that our current state of affairs was created by rich white men in suits. And after all, whites are the ones in power. So whatever direction this country is going, it's being taken there by the ones in power.

 

I wouldn't call feminism as a failure. It's responsible a large portion of economic growth. In any case, these ideas have be championed for decades. They're not really "New"

again, i don't see what you're talking about. America isn't doing so bad. And we're certainly doing a hell of a lot better than we were during the 1960's.

 

Not so. Take the following statement: "violent crime is committed disproportionally by low-income blacks in inner cities." This is a statement of truth. But you would take this truth, and morph it into the message that "blacks suck, and I don't want to live near them." That's the part that's racist.

In modern society, it is much better to err on the side of being anti-white, than run the risk of being anti-black (particularly if you happen to be white). If you don't understand how and why this is, in both your personal and professional life--then it is you who are the loser.

 

From the link:
"The authors of the study cite a drop in white residency in those regions as a major reason for the decline."

 

You know, a part of your statement was the first time ever that you were correct. Perhaps is some of our thought process kicking in? I refer to the fact that not everyone's the same.

Let's elaborate: Could "Whiteys" cultivate Africa? Unfortunately, no we can't. That very problem has boggled us down for centuries. But could we cultivate any other nationality? No, we can't. Canadians cultivated Canada, and they'd be the first to say that American Culture and Canadian culture, while sharing similarities and even languages, are inherently different.

It goes without saying that other nationalities equally cannot cultivate a foreign land. The ones who do manage to do so, happen to understand and fit into the said culture, or the two cultures have relative similarities.

Let's take the U.S.-Japanese alliance. It's a historic alliance predating to the expedition Era(You know, when the boats crossed the seas wanting to discover how much there was to the Earth). It took some time, but eventually the Japanese trusted the West in an alliance. They then took our technology to newer and greater heights, not only in the early 20th century but beyond. As far as the 19th century English-Culture is concerned, the idea of mannerism, or self-respect and of hard work used to predominate English Speaking nations.

And many Northern-Eastern states such as my own Pennsylvania have the Sakura Blossom trees to attest for it.

My point: For true, proper relations to take effect, nationalities should seek alliances with nationalities that tend to *agree* with their viewpoints.

Leftist flawed ideology states that we should do this multicultural thing, but it's roughly the same as water and oil together. It doesn't mix. Eventually, if we sought alliances that favored everyone, even those nationalities that we did not align with, we would eventually via 3rd party connection come to know these other nationalities.

Individual Self-Determinism is the most effective form of Universalism. Some may never align, but that's perfectly fine. Because the ones who could align, the most beneficial alliances that harmed no culture would be the end result.

I was planning on making a thread based on this socio-economic view of mine, but might as well spoil it here. Universalism= The Self-Determination and alliance of self-interested peoples.

 

Jews opened the floodgates for third world immigration into the US. Source? Your VP and research which anyone can do for themselves, so that they can SEE it is true. The Jews that did this were 'dual nationals'. That is to say, they may well have been American born, but because Jews get a second country(one that is on stolen land and involves the natives not being able to return to that land), they are 'American Israeli's' in practice. This was not done to help you. This was not done out of good intent, that has now gone a bit awry. It was done with malevolent intent, against the white Christian demographic of America. You must understand that Jews have a long and deep hatred of Christians and Europeans(indeed all races apart from themselves, they are the true 'supremacists'), therefore, nothing they ever do to or for any non Jewish nation will ever be for your betterment. Not ever.

What they are good at doing is taking something which serves their agenda, and making it appear that it is to everyone's benefit. We can see this in so many ways, that it can no longer be denied. Domestically, you can see it in how they have first allowed so much third world immigration in to YOUR country, how their media have perpetuated the myth that ONLY this position of 'IT IS GOOD FOR EVERYONE' is the acceptable position, how their Holywood has served to demonise whites and Christians, while enflaming blacks and other minorities.

We can see it internationally. How many times have you heard a Jew say 'Look, what we are looking to do is going to be bad for all other countries, but we really want you to do it anyway, for our benefit and just that of Israel'? They cannot do it like that, so they need to speak in hollow terms and keep repeating them - 'special relationship', 'special friendship', 'Israeli's interests ARE American interests', and so on.

Notice how Jews whose arse Biden was kissing do not seem to wish to bring third world immigration to Israel. Notice how Jewry in the US went totally silent when Israel went postal on blacks who tried to seek refuge there, last year. Jews do not care about blacks. Jews do not care about other people's and races, but it did suit them to retard America and Europe, while adopting the precise opposite actions for their Jewish state. It eliminates the competition if you can retard the population in a cultural sense. Dumb it down and retard it enough, and they won't even notice when their own Gov and media are essentially the victim of a coup.

Jews know that a US or Europe without this MC stuff would be bad for them. People would suddenly start to notice their over representation more. People would not be distracted as much. The focus would be on the source of the problems, and not the symptoms of the problem.

Jews know that without the MC tactics they have also eliminated the odds of a society ever reaching a true consensus about anything, they are well aware that the more mono culture your society it, the more it works cohesively as a collective. They know the more 'diverse' it is, the less it works cohesively in a collective and truly progressive manner. Why else do you think they work hard to flood the US, Canada, Oz, and Europe with third world immigrants, yet the Jewish state has the strictest(and most racial) of all immigration policies?

Jews have not brought the immigrants to live among you to help them or you.

They have done it to help themselves and only themselves.

 

Jews have their own country with very strict immigration and certainly understand what a Jew is.

So if the Japanese were nice enough to accept me and my family, then sometime in the future my grandchildren could rightly complain about the Japanese domination over them and celebrate their demise? What logic is that? They accept us and we return the favor like that? Id be disgusted in my grandchildren if they abused that good will like that. But hey i wouldnt live in Japan unless i really liked their people and their culture, i just dont understand you people that would see it differently.

All these racists calls are getting out of control, im pretty sure its against forum rules. Amazing how the so-called intolerant people are showing a lot of tolerance in being demonized. Ive not read one post where anyone has said their race is superior, they simple argue non whites are attacking whites disproportionately in their homelands, so they have nowhere to go if they dont like it. Clearly some love it, others dont but see the later have NO choice.

 

I'm confused. Are you talking about "multiculturalism" as a foreign policy strategy? Or as a domestic policy theme? Cause I'm talking more about the domestic realm.
The US is different than other countries cause it's a big democracy. There is no other democracy as big, in the world. And due to our sheer size, we have always been a country based on multiple cultures coexisting with one another. There is no such thing as a unified "American" culture. Never has, never will be.

 

The rate of violent crime among the black community is at an absurdly high rate and nobody can deny that.

 

All of this.

 

If the Japanese were discriminating against them, would they not be in their right to complain about it? If you are a persecuted minority, you have every right to complain. This is true whether you live in Japan or the US. You speak about "good will" but it's no longer good will when you're being discriminated against.

some guy is saying blacks have an inferior culture, that they're criminals, and that they don't want to live near them or go near them. I'm sorry , but that's racist. I'm just pointing out the obvious.

And white people are the dominant people in their own society. Why would they want to go anywhere? Why, because neo-conservative ideology has convinced them that they are victims, when in reality, they enjoy every advantage, being the dominant race in society? Cry me a river.

 

I posted a link before that showed that this was not true. America was predominately European German-Americans/English-Americans make up 50% of the American European Population. And before the mid-19th century, this European boom was continuing.

I'm talking about multiculturalism period, in the grand scheme of things, from a humanistic perspective it is a failed idea. Instead, the proper solution is Individual free-will and choice in aligning with who we want to. From a geopolitical standpoint, I would only seek alliances with nations that benefit us.

Free-trade equally, is not necessarily bad but when we give out more than what we take in, it becomes counterproductive.

Leftism is 'All or Nothing", never in the middle and never accurate. Leftists are what they claim rightists: Emotionalists who never look at the real issues.

 

So what? At one point, America was 100% native American. But none of this bears any relation to what America is today. America today, has so many different cultures both ethnicity based, and location based. Multi-culturalism isn't really just an option, it is the only reality that can exist (unless you're willing to deport all the non-white American citizens, and even then, there would be significant cultural heterogeneity amongst white Americans).

Isn't that what multiculturalism is? Individual factions, each with the free will to align with other factions. From a geopolitical standpoint, we do only seek alliances with nations that benefit us. That IS current policy.

I dunno, I seem to be looking at real issues, when they arise. I'm a fairly non-emotional person. I consider myself left leaning. Not sure what you're getting at.