9/11 - WTC Building 7: Sound Evidence for Explosions

Truthers trading on their own credibility usually don't have enough equity to purchase much more than the sour grapes they end up with.

 

Still with the parrot act. tsk.

- - - Updated - - -

You saw on TV that educated Arabs are cavemen ... and you believed it without researching the claim on your own. This is why the 'truth movement' failed so utterly.

 

The truth movement hasn't failed. We are not going away until the culprits who did the dirty deed are outed in the court of public opinion. There have been professional hit jobs on the truth and obfuscators who have used ridicule, deception, and mind games to keep the truth hidden, yet we will persist until the truth is known. NIST lied and 3000 Americans died. The people behind it are going to get outed.

 

As long as you ignore evidence and throw around words like 'cavemen' to try and spread your 'truth' then yes, you have failed.

What is the address of the 'court of public opinion'?

 

The address of the 'court of public opinion' is more than 50% of the people of the world. When they know the truth about 9/11 the CIA will be toast. More and more Americans are learning that the CIA sponsored Al Qaeda so Americans would support wars in the Middle East. Wars for profit. War Is A Racket. They are the ones with the funding, the expertise, and the motive.

 

Dream big, I say. Do you have a deadline for this 'toasting'? (It's been 12 years ...)

 

It has only been 5 years. NIST lied about the WTC Building 7 controlled demolition in their 2008 report, and they committed fraud with their lie about column 79 which was finally admitted to last year. Now that we have the proof, people ridiculing truthers are simply ridiculing the truth. Liars are losers in the age of the Internet.

 

Precisely. That's why the 'truthers' have lost; their premises are based on lies. (ie 'cavemen')

Deadline? Evidence? Anything?

 

You keep saying the truth movement hasn't failed, but what has it actually done with all this so called evidence you say you have. Surely if it's that damning you would have gotten somewhere by now and someone would have listened, After all it is 12 years since the event and all I can see are people making their grand claims on sites like this,in Youtube video's and in papers by so called experts which are usually quickly disproven.

I can pretty much guarantee come this time next year you'll still be here on this forum or maybe another making the same claims, saying that it's just a matter of time before you get your new investigation and that the movement is still growing. Personally I'd love to see the day a bunch of Truthers got in a court room for their new investigation because it would probably turn into chaos, because having visited many sites like I know that many can't even agree on one theory.So good luck anyway.

 

Again, it was only last year when the NIST report was proven to be a fraud. I guarantee you by this time next year a lot of professionals are going to join the truth movement because their careers will be in jeopardy if they continue to promote the lies.

 

Thomas Eagar has already damaged the reputation of MIT engineers. If he is the best engineer they have then I would not trust any building engineer from MIT.

 

Okay, guess we'll see.

 

MIT and Purdue University have some explaining to do. Their engineering departments were in on the cover-up.

 

I'm certain your grand jury will convince them to come clean.

 

Absolutely incredible lies. Just incredible. They actually qualify for some of the biggest fibs I've ever heard. The video footage of the collapses below completely disproves you.

WTC 7:-

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RwFAnP7_RtY

North Tower:-

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0VixEL9h9pk

Straight down into their own footprints in seconds. Absolutely without doubt controlled demolitions.

 

In their own footprints?

Are you suggesting that all the debris from the twin towers stayed within their 208' x 208' footprint?

Really?

 

Classic troother dishonesty..NONE of the buildings went 'straight down in their own footprint' nor were they ANY kind of 'controlled'

 

keep in mind that debunkers make up their own definitions that have nothing to do with reality and that in its own footprint in their psychotic world means that every shred of building material including dust must absolutely lay within the confines of exterior walls.

 

The debunkers make up their own definitions and laws of physics.

 

No,we understand them very well,and don't try to narrowly define them,based on our ignorance,the way troothers do.

 

Incorrect!

We don't make up our own definitions, you just don;t know how to correctly apply those definitions already in place to specific scenarios. This is why you don't want to discuss it.

 

Jonathan Cole's scientific experiments prove that the collapse of the towers were impossible without explosives of some sort. It is elementary physics.

 

So you're contradicting what Cole says? It was explosives in your opinion and not incendiaries?

- - - Updated - - -

Nope. It's not which is why you and Cole don't get it.

 

This statement is factually incorrect. And has been proven to be factually incorrect. It will remain factually incorrect no matter how many times you lie about it.

 

That is the official position. NIST WTC Lead Investigator Shyam Sunder. The towers collapsed in 9 seconds and 11 seconds ... 9 11, 911, 9/11. "Experts Speak Out" at 105:00 listen for yourself.