Why are racists so afraid of being labled racist?

THERE!!! You have landed upon truth!!

 

Yeah, how crazy that you get labeled as racist for saying black people are biologically less intelligent. But it's ok, because you do nice stuff for these dumb people.

 

Are you pro-white or pro-diversity?

 

No, and you're evidently reading into my post what you want to read into it. It's clear what I said; the racist and bigot is generally too weak-kneed and cowardly to stick behind his lofty principles and confront his victim to explain why he feels so superior. Would you, for example, go up to a random black person and say. 'this is why I don't like blacks'? Doubtful to the point of improbability-and why? Because racists are usually too stupid to explain why they are the way they are. The slightly more intelligent of them (relatively speaking), bring up reams of negative statistics in order to justify their position but, as one poster pointed out, they seldom offer any attempt at causation. They are simply numbers.

 

You mean would I do what I have seen at least one Black do to a White over the course of my lifetime . . . walk up to a White at an event and say pretty much "This is why I don't like Whites?" No I would not do that because I generally don't feel that sort of hatred toward people who have not personally harmed me and I am also simply too cultured to be so beastly. No . . . I don't think I would do any such thing; not even if -- like that Black I was much larger and stronger and younger than the lone White guy in that area of the event -- so no, not even us majority BROWN guys at that event thought that it was a cool thing to do. But thanks for asking.

 

The white race is only "superior" in what it thinks is superior in it's own way. But black Americans are now clearly and obviously the superiors. The highly aggressive, violent nature and culture of black people has earned them superiority in America. Blacks cannot be considered inferior when they have outsmarted white people and gained firm control of one of the most powerful nations in the world.

 

They don't have control. Obama was Affirmative Action all the way by racist congress members who recognized that the government is broken, and their plan was to dump the bankrupt government on the unsuspecting first term senator, so the whole world can see how an empty suit black man handles the situation. Chances are George Bush explained to those inclined not to bring charges of insubordination that the government needs a new constitution, because that is what businesses need when the go into bankruptcy. Why Romney thought he could fix it all with out a new constitution is a question that has yet to be asked, but he should know better - it is what he got rich from doing - right??? Reorganizing businesses so they are more efficient.

It is absurd to believe that anyone could learn the tricks of the trade in three years, what the twenty and thirty year congress members know - you know how to play tricks on new people into your trade, don't you?

An obvious trick to the casual observer is why did Obama receive a Nobel Peace Prize??? The answer is that the United States government has always seemed to be racially biased, yet the society governed has been incredibly successful, and ultimately the envy of all other nations. Obviously, no developing nation can replicate the constitution, government, and subsequently, the successful society. It is very complicated why our government and society has been successful and cannot be replicated, but to the other nations it appears to have something to do with racial boundaries, and Obama seemingly broke that, and it was hoped that he would deliver the interpretations of the constitution for the other countries. Nelson Mandela was affirmatively awarded a Peace Prize for similar reasons, but he didn't have it, and was only good for photo ops with black American race baiters. Mandela died knowing that educated black people would rather cry of oppression in America than help him organize a country for black people.

Although, most people do not understand what is going on, because they have jobs and cannot watch C-SPAN everyday and read between the lines, all of the other world leaders know Obama is an empty suit stereo-typical black man who thinks government is a win-win situation for the bold corrupt politician; and that is how he is playing it out. And he is now getting his pants handed to him.

At the Funeral for Nelson Mandela, the selfies was a gag that they played on him - Mrs. Obama recognized it. And then there's the crazy sign language guy - how do you think that happened - incompetency somewhere in the lower levels of government??? Please, that was set up; and Obama and the world leaders know it.

They probably won't be able to get him for Benghazi and Fast and Furious, because there is very little evidence, and the job description for Executive includes the termination of service (life). But it appears that they may be able to bring charges for the IRS scandal, and it looks like they are lining it up to coincide with this summer's House election campaign cycle.

It's obvious that there are problems of crony-ism with the Justice Department and the Executive Branch, and the only way to fix that is by fixing the Constitution, but for some reason, all you geniuses cannot figure that out. Secondly, it is very difficult for the congress to hold a trial, most of the congress members are not prosecuting attorneys, and do not have the time to prepare a trial. Again, all you genius political junkies cannot figure that out - you go on and on about "impeachment," but you have no idea how much work has to go into it, when these guys have all the other work of congress to do. And don't go thinking, special prosecutor - it worked the first couple of times, now it's cronyed-up.

The newest trick that Obama did not understand was that the new global Internet media keeps a vigilant watch, and history will not be kind to Obama, and subsequently, black people, for being so gullible.

 

"They don't have control. Obama was Affirmative Action."

Yes, Obama was indeed a proud product of affirmative action. He and 95% of all blacks who have been successful did so by having the enormous advantage of affirmative action. Nevertheless, blacks were smart enough to guilt white people into giving them affirmative action. That in itself is very clever and indicates that they are superior to the gullible and foolish white race.

 

You state all this with such confidence, but only because it is preached by self-glorifying PC-dominated cliques that intimidate academic professionals into towing the line about what even they know is contradicted by reality. In order for anyone to force himself to believe this, first he has to hypnotize himself into thinking that there can not possibly be such a thing as racial inferiority. Therefore, any conclusion based on the evidence leading to a judgment of inferiority automatically contradicts itself. So the judgment process has to be re-worked until it avoids that conclusion. For example, Black crime doesn't indicate a genetically criminal culture because it can't possibly lead to that fiat impossibility. Therefore, it absolutely must be merely an understandable reaction to prejudice.or poverty.

 

And you think the solution is to better inform people of this, and hope that someone else has the creativity to generate the legislation correction???

You're not afraid that the blacks will start rioting, like those wimpy congress members, are you?

It's a bit more complicated than just complaining. We need a comprehensive solution to all of society's problems, and you and everyone else, need to understand that congress does not have the ability to do it, because the constitution is inadequate for a modern sophisticated society. The problems are because of the constitution vagueness of ideas that appear to be perfect to you and everyone else.

 

"You're not afraid that the blacks will start rioting?"

Yes. I am very much afraid they will start rioting, and they already have on several occasions rioted for their cause. But one cannot blame them for taking corrective action in the name of social justice.

It would not be at all inappropriate for America to proclaim a once-a-month amnesty day for African Americans. On that day blacks could riot and commit whatever other retribution against white people without facing charges levied against them. Such an "open season" would provide blacks with a much-deserved opportunity to garner some payback and revenge for past social injustices committed against them.

 

No no no. I do respect blacks for being aggressive but they are victims. White liberals and jews feel sorry for and exploit them.

 

Quit judging others by yourself.
What makes you think that you know what is on other people's mind?
Being against black African immigration does Not mean that we Hate them, nor does it mean that we feel "superior". Just means we don't want any more of them here. We would love to see them prosper - in their own lands.

 

I judge racist scum for what they are; a pus stain on humanity.

 

Now, this is bigotry. I don't condone hate in the name of race for any reason, but it appears you disagree. Wow, just wow.

 

So if a poster makes openly racist comments they are not a racist, yeah right. If you are a racist be proud of it, be what you are, seems like some here are proud of it look at their signatures and the thread themes some always seem to post, if it looks and smells like poop, it is poop, simple as that.

 

I dunno. It seems to me that you are being just a tad bit harsh here in your blanket condemnation of leftwingers.

 

You don't want them here for no specific reason, yeah right. So, what to do about all those blacks that have lived here for generations, hmmmm?

- - - Updated - - -

That is the difference between us, I see it as a problem both right and left, racisim is wrong no matter what someones political leanings are, you on the otherhand.....

- - - Updated - - -

That is the difference between us, I see it as a problem both right and left, racisim is wrong no matter what someones political leanings are, you on the otherhand.....

 

I on the other hand am perfect in every way. It's a social burden to be sure, but I still manage to cope.

 

Maybe in your mind, many have that flaw, I am not one of them, oh well.

 

I hope you do not expect a sensible and honest debate
I do not expect racist even on this board to debate you logically

You'll be lucky if they do not start about obamacare and Benghazi

 

I don't think black people control anything when more than 50% are murdered in the womb...

 

America should be a dominant culture.

 

So you're saying that Margret Sanger (Planned Parenthood founder) is a racist. Just because she attended KKK meetings to spread her message of abortion for all blacks, and set up a clinic in every black urban neighborhood in the country does that make her a racist? I wonder...

 

I state that with no more confidence than I would employ with any other statement of what I understand to be fact. I am essentially apolitical, and I loathe PC (which can be applied to either leftist or rightist ideologies), so do not go searching for motives in that area. It is reading and comprehension of the studies carried out by various authorities in the field which leads me to the conclusions I stated. And I am not convinced that professionals, many of whom have made these areas a life study, are intimidated by cliques of any sort to 'tow the line' (the customary phrase BTW, is' toe the line' - an idiomatic expression usually meaning to conform to a rule or standard - 'tow the line' makes no sense whatsoever).

I would be happy to entertain your alternative theories (supported by logic and research) wherein matters of human superiority and inferiority are dictated by ethnicity and/or genetics - as I am sure would other members of this board. It could prove to be a valuable learning process.