There were several cameras in the boarding areas of Dulles and Newark which would clearly show exactly who boarded those flights.
It seems quite arrogant to say that pilots who fly the 757 for a living know less than you do about what such an airplane will do or not do. I have better things to do than listen to such arrogant nonsense.
Just asking . . . Are you continuing, to assert commercial airliners did NOT crash on 911 because you are reading claims, by some guys, claiming to be pilots? You seem to have your own no-fly zone all figured out, plus-size.
Not a shred of evidence. No such statements were made by hijackers after the fact all those claims were proven to be fiction years ago. Cell phones worked on aircraft in 911. It is proven false to claim they did not in addition aircraft phones were common. Flight 93/crashed in shanksville and no evidence proves otherwise. There was nothing impossible or unusual about how the hijacked air craft were crashed All of these claims have been debated exhaustively and proven to be false
No, I'm saying no commercial airliners crashed on 9/11 for the simple reason that there is no evidence that commercial airliners crashed. And to be clear, I do not consider a government press release to be a factual statement of anything at all, though there are exceptions. 9/11 was not an exception. No commercial airliner crashed in Pennsylvania, no commercial airliner crashed at the Pentagon that day, and the airplane that struck the south tower was not an airliner, was not 175. As for the first strike, it's not likely to have been AA11, but there was something.
Yes overwhelming evidence proves that they crashed. All 4 crashes were the hijacked airlines that is proven fact which no evidence disputes
Yes, you certainly do have a vivid and expansive imagination. Everybody there and all the pictures could not find an airliner in that Pennsylvania field, but you swear up and down there was one. LOL
That's because it was a crash site and aircraft tend to not look like an aircraft after they crash They tend to look like debris which was found. It is you with an idiotic idea that aircraft remain intact after a catastrophic crash. You should become aware that cartoons are fake
No,the point was,by YOU that no videos existed,I showed otherwise and now your're just whining and being a jerk because of your ridiculous standard of proof
point to any time I've posted that I've been 'dishonest',and moving the goalposts is an apt description of what you're doing,and just because your 'theories' are consistently told by you means nothing.
Yes, and here it is: "No concrete evidence exists for the official story. Forensic evidence such as part numbers of the specific airliners that allegedly crashed that day have not been produced. Also, there are NO photos or video tapes of any passengers boarding any of the flights in question. That is a giant red flag as far as I am concerned. The biggest crime ever committed on US soil and no video evidence of the alleged terrorists boarding any of the supposed weapons, in the year 2001? Bull! I am not sure exactly what happened that day, but I am absolutely certain that the story we have been fed is a bunch of unsubstantiated crap." Yes, when you added the Dulles stipulation you shifted the goal posts. I don't expect you to acknowledge it because truthers by their very nature are mendacious. I didn't make a false claim, YOU shifted the goal posts. Maybe you're not up to this?
Wrong. I did not shift the goal posts at all. I stated that no video tape of ANY of the passengers or the alleged terrorists BOARDING ANY of those planes has been produced by the officials. That was my initial post and that is what I have maintained all along. I did not add any stipulation regarding Dulles. I simply pointed out that there were over 300 security cameras in place at Dulles on the day in question, and yet no tape showing Barbara Olson, any of the terrorists or any of the other passengers has been produced. If Mrs. Olson, the terrorists and the rest of those reportedly killed that day boarded that flight in Dulles, there would OBVIOUSLY be ample footage of that. You and your cohorts are a bunch of deceptive trolls and it's all right here in black and white. Read it and weep.
MOD EDIT - Rule 3 You stated no videos of evidence exists with no other specifics period. MOD EDIT - Rule 3
MOD EDIT - Rule 3 You call truthers mendacious, even as you defend the story created by the pentagon, a very large group of known liars. Did you know that several members of the 911 Commission wanted to bring perjury charges against pentagon officers for their always changing testimony? They could not keep their stories straight, yet you seem to ignore that well documented mendacity so that you can call a person seeking the simple truth "mendacious". Wow.
This is actually not true. All plane crashes leave at least part of the vertical stabilizer, fuselage, seats, or wheels intact. Where were the bodies? There was none of that in Shanksville or the Pentagon for that matter. Just Google search plane crashes. There are plenty of photos. None of them look like the Shanksville site. Flight 93 supposedly either evaporated or buried itself. Both are ludicrous notions.
Nice comeback. Google search plane crashes and find out for yourself. Take a look at the pictures and then come back to me.
Google images do not provide you with evidence of all plane crashes as you imply. Your statement that ALL plane crashes leave certian parts intact is false and unsupportable. Select images prove nothing