Global warming scepticism

What is the evidence? Cause humans have CO2 therefore we're to blame? Funny, isn't evidence friend. Evidence, as defined by scientists is experimental proof. Your only proof of anything is humans spew CO2. We wouldn't be alive if we didn't. So now tell me how warm 10 PPM of CO2 is?

 

the evidence has been presented to you over and over

you seem to be covering your eyes and saying, what evidence?

 

Yet the climate jihadists ran him out of studying climate science because he presented some inconvenient information.

 

LOL, Christianity and Climate Science. Nothing better than proving it is a religious experience for many of you. Opinion is about all you have and you have yet to explain anything in your own words.

 

you obviously have no clue what constitutes proof and i'm not a christian

this is all about science, facts, evidence and logic

 

Yet you post a video of a thin skinned scientist that blocks opposing opinions on twitter who's husband is a minister and expounds on Christianity and Climate Science.

So far all you have is opinion.

Now, try to use your own words to explain science, facts, evidence and logic. So far all you have is Youtube, logical fallacies, cut and paste and opinion.

 

i've got science, facts, evidence and logic from credible sources

all you've got is misinformation from unethical lobbyists and paid liars


Global temperature rise

All three major global surface temperature reconstructions show that Earth has warmed since 1880.(5) Most of this warming has occurred since the 1970s, with the 20 warmest years having occurred since 1981 and with all 10 of the warmest years occurring in the past 12 years.(6) Even though the 2000s witnessed a solar output decline resulting in an unusually deep solar minimum in 2007-2009, surface temperatures continue to increase.(7)


5) - https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/indicators/

6) - T.C. Peterson et.al., "State of the Climate in 2008," Special Supplement to the Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, v. 90, no. 8, August 2009, pp. S17-S18.

7) - I. Allison et.al., The Copenhagen Diagnosis: Updating the World on the Latest Climate Science, UNSW Climate Change Research Center, Sydney, Australia, 2009, p. 11

 

LOL, the same old playbook of false claims that you are unable to back up with facts.

 

the playbook is based on science, facts, evidence and logic from credible sources

 

LOL, whatever Skippy. Bout time you provided some of that besides opinion, Youtube, cut and paste, and logical fallacies.

 

i've provided science, facts, evidence and logic from credible sources

don't you feel a bit hypocritical for criticizing me about cutting and pasting when you do the same thing?

 

Not wash, rinse, repeat. Something new and something not from a cartoonists alarmist blog. Not that you would understand.

 

i said, don't you feel a bit hypocritical for criticizing me about cutting and pasting when you do the same thing?

 

Wash, rinse, repeat. Knew you wouldn't be able to understand the difference.

 

of course you won't address the hypocrisy, it's obviously true

 

Cain't figure it out, can you?

 

i've known for a long time, you're dishonest

you criticize others for something you've done repeatedly

 

Yep, all you have is character assassination. The sign of a failed argument.

 

i have the truth

 

you do? says who, you? hahahahahahaha, dude this is exactly how bad peer review is. someone who thinks they have all of the truths and shows none and is there own critic. funny stuff. BTW, you never replied to the experiment that I posted showing that a control jug capped and a CO2 jug capped have exactly the same temperature. Hah!!!!! How about that. CO2 didn't make the jar hotter. Also, as I expected, CO2 doesn't increase temperatures as I have always claimed. It isn't a heating element capable of adding heat. It absorbs the light of the incoming and that's it, it doesn't miraculously create it's own energy to produce more heat. Unless of course you have an experiment that actually does show that.

 

another PeeWee Herman reply. I love it. You got nothing. I know you don't, if you actually had evidence you'd have posted it by now. May I sugest you actually look up the science methodology, post up what evidence means in science methodology. Might make you a better debater. Right now you stink at debating. You don't know opinion from reality. Hint, someone making a statement on a subject is never considered fact. Never. Someone making a statement with evidence supporting their statement, then that would be fact. You have someone off of you tube who can't get enough of hearing their own voices on subject matter they know nothing about. You fail!!! And again, I gave you an experiment that proves CO2 does not increase temperatures. I can give you Bill Nye's as well. If you like.

 

the comments i posted show what's true

he criticizes others for using 'cut & paste', but he does it himself

co2 trap energy, it's well explained below

 

yet, it can't create heat. Just admit it. It's simple, it can't create heat. I've still not seen any experiment. Post one up come on man, you want to talk the talk, walk the walk.

and as for Hoosier, posting up copy and pastes from links and sources is one thing, not giving any summary or explanation of said posts is you just posting copy and pasted material that isn't yours. You need commentary of fact, which to date in this thread you have zippo!!!!

Hey and you could comment on the experiment I did post up. Still crickets from you there. What's wrong, can't comment?

 

why are you ignoring the sun's heat?

 

I'm not, seems you are. The sun pops out and a thermometer reads 85 degrees. You say CO2 will make it hotter than 85. so how does the CO2 create the extra heat?