CO2 levels higher than any time in last 800,000 years

Hard to present facts to someone with an 8th grade understanding of science and no clue about what they post.

 

Boogie woogie. Hahaha

 

Well, now we get down to the true level of your intelligence. Thanks for the demo.

 

HAHAHAHA Still you have nothing!

 

Certainly don't at your grade level.

 

That's because you didn't go that far in school. This is too easy. LOL

 

So says the plumber.

 

The evidence that global mean surface temperature has increased 1.0 °C over the last century is unequivocal.
The evidence says it is 95% certain that human CO2 emissions are the primary cause of this increase.
The evidence says that global mean surface temperature will likely be another 1.0 °C warmer than today.
The evidence says that we're pretty sure global mean surface temperature has not varied this much in the last 11,000 years, and certainly not this quickly.
If you think this amount of warming is "minute" then you should calculate the amount of energy needed to effect such a small change.

http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/WorldOfChange/decadaltemp.php

 

1 degree over that long span is indeed tiny.

This is a lot over nothing.

 

You are entitled to your opinion. Every science organization on the planet disagrees with you.

 

If you truly have the scientific mind, you are a natural skeptic.

- - - Updated - - -

Tell me please of your science background?

 

So, it is pure politics to you. I figured it was.

I have not done a thing to help defeat ISIS.

I think Putin did more to defeat them than this country has.

 

I am a natural skeptic. Skepticism is healthy for science. But it should not cause paralysis of action when the evidence is overwhelming. Be skeptical of whether cigarettes cause cancer if you like.....but I wouldn't recommend smoking.

 

You then have no formal course in weather. No formal courses in Physics or Chemistry?

Trying to make sure.

Stop talking of smoking. If I defend smoking, then use that.

Not trying to sound snippy.

A degree over such a long span simply is not alarming.

 

You keep making a claim with no evidence. We have pages and pages of evidence that says that one degree shows how fast temps are changing and is a forecast of things to come. Do the people at NASA have formal courses in weather, physics, chemistry? Where is your evidence?

 

Since you are so worried about a tiny warming, let me have you read what Dr. Lindzen says on that. And this man is a solid authority.

http://www.climatedepot.com/2016/01...laim-why-lend-credibility-to-this-dishonesty/

By: Marc Morano - Climate DepotJanuary 20, 2016 5:41 PM with 21 comments

 

NASA is about space.

My claim is better than your claim.

I don't have my hair on fire over this. I don't pick politicians to vote for over this.

1 degree with 18 years of standstill temps is not proof.

I told you people prior.

We got the great lakes due to warming. We now have NY state including NY City to use thanks to warming.

Trust me on this. I don't mind a degree C over 100 years.

They sold you a false ideology.

 

As I said before. You have your handful of guys. We have every science organization in the world. Russia, china even north korea is on board. You may choose to believe your guy. You can choose to believe whatever you want. But the evidence for AGW is OVERWHELMINGLY on my side.

- - - Updated - - -

"My claim is better than your claim" is a preschoolers argument. LOL. You have no evidence

 

You are the one making a big deal out of a degree C.

And over such a long time span.

What else do you fear?

 

I heard 800000 Years ago the Woolly Mammoth had a monopoly on the OIL industry! There were Sabre Tooth Factories as far as the eye can see......

 

Maybe you should see what the first "A" in NASA stands for before you make such claims.

 

Again. We don't need you to believe in AGW. So many people do all over the world that your voice is a tiny whisper in the chorus.

 

Again you put your faith in belief, not science. Telling.

 

As much as you fight over this, one wonders if you truly believe that.

Take globally for instance.

Name a country that takes this serious?

If you say the US, where are the dykes being built to protect Florida?

- - - Updated - - -

Aeronautics. Where does that say global climate?

 

Many countries are taking it seriously. Far more seriously than you. Who has suggested dykes are needed in florida today?