CO2 levels higher than any time in last 800,000 years

I did more than check Hansen out. I printed one of his papers on global climate. I plan to evaluate it and comment later.

As to what Chuck Hagel did as Sec of Defense, no doubt he was humping for Obama and under orders to toe the line.

Notice what Chuck did about this issue in 1997 when he was not beholding to Obama.

 

Proof that there is still hope for most deniers.

 

The rise at Florida is in the millimeters. Not even centimeters.

2.54 cm = 1 in.

The way the left talks, one is hoping for a wall around Florida.

- - - Updated - - -

Science is tested over and over. Why do you call me a denier when you really only have a political opinion?

None of you present science.

I have. I have posted at least one scientific paper by a top ranked climate scientist.

 

I have presented tons of science to you. You don't like that science. Fine. But don't pretend its not there

 

I am a pilot. Don't you think we study weather? Not just it is raining today, but reasons for weather. Patterns in weather. How much prediction there is.

Sure NASA knows flying.

I use Holland as my model for warding off the ocean. They are well known for their dykes.

If you honestly think this is serious, you need to shout to create dykes to save the seashores.

 

It may come to that eventually. We may be able to reduce co2 enough that it does not come to that.

 

No, you expect me to chase my own tail.

I presented science to you.

I don't believe you studied his paper.

- - - Updated - - -

You still blame CO2. Despite the evidence.

 

And I don't believe you read one paper on the NASA page. I blame co2 because of the evidence

 

There is no money to be made by the "deniers."

The big money is for the alarmists.

Obama will pay huge money for papers agreeing that man heats the atmosphere.

This is why some on the left fight over this.

MONEY

 

The Koch brothers have no money?
Reallly? When did they go broke?

- - - Updated - - -

By the way.....how does Obama pay for ANYTHING? LOL

 

I am studying Hansen's paper. How are you doing on the paper by Lindzen?

- - - Updated - - -

The Koch brothers are not behind this.

Obama has a lot of cash at the treasury.

 

Yes. Obama uses his special key to open the treasury. How can you be so badly informed. The GOP run congress controls how every penny is spent. If they give any discretion to Obama they can withdraw it anytime they want. You have to be kidding?

 

This is why I find it pointless to discuss solutions with people who won't even admit there is a problem

Remind me again how many climate scientists are on Forbes list of richest people? Now, how many people in the oil industry are on that list?

 

A while back a few members were showing these CHARTS that they claimed were showing Climate Change to be false.

I looked on the sides of these charts and I saw the betters...BP.

The letters stood for...BRITISH PETROLEUM!! LOL!!!

AA

 

You just agreed with me. LMAO

Congress appropriates, Obama spends.

I hope if you claim Reagan ran up deficits, you keep what you told me in mind.

 

You are so badly informed about our government and science. You actually think Obama can spend money without consent of congress. You have a lot of reading to do

 

I never told you that.

 

Not familiar with this administration after 8 years? Go figure.

 

Obama is stealing the money out of the treasury and putting it into science....you know, that hedonistic approach to solving problems when we should be praying to Allah, Ooops, I mean "God".
I have yet to see a reference from you from a scientific community that disses climate change.....
Like John's Hopkins, NASA, major university. I hear a lot about those 24 that deny in the last 35 years from the peer reviewed community of 1400 articles that does not. . So, scientists in actual studies are not 97%, but are really 99% backed in their support of man caused climate change.

 

Yes, like using the NASA budget for climate change. Didn't know that was such a problem in space.

 

Well now you know. LOL

 

Yes, I know that politically it is but space doesn't much care about politics and climate change.

 

Ha ha.
I guess you forgot that one of NASA's primary objectives is to "collect and summarize" data, FROM SPACE. The ability to gather information from space is important for our survival as a species. That information goes throughout the govt agencies. One is to the defense depart., which I think you might agree is important. It also goes to agriculture, the EPA and other other agencies responsible for public health.

Your opinion on what NASA should or should not be doing is stunning in your lacking in awarenss. Just reading their goals and their programs and their obligations, in depth, might "learn" you something. But then, to do that, you could also go to their Web site. That has not been OK'd by the " can't trust the black president or science coalition" of the far flat earth right.


Don't forget during the presidential elections, to set your clocks back, 100 years. NASA! What's NASA ?

 

And this folks, is why space exploration, what NASA was created for, takes a back seat to politics.

 

This message above is sent to your fellow lobotomy patients.