At Hiroshima Memorial, Obama Says Nuclear Arms Require ‘Moral Revolution’

1. An article written before the deal was even completed. Got anything actually relevant?

2. Nuclear plants have a large up front cost but benefit more over time. It's requires thinking more than a single quarterly profits report ahead, something the Right is incapable of.

 

Yawn. No hole, you silly Marxist. You simply cannot address the points made in the links and now you're trying to blow smoke to cover up that fact.

What's got you in such a tizzy?

 

Your opinion of what's relevant is, ironically, irrelevant. It's a very good overview of the deal and the Obama regime's machinations.

Actually the right has historically been for nuclear power but the bolsheviks on the left have demonized the
industry until it's practically gone (remember China Syndrome...a very good example of the left scaring the issue out of existence).

 

When is Obama going to England to apologise for winning the Revolutionary War?

 

What is your evidence otherwise? He does not want us to the be the economic powerhouse he wants us to be equally poor. He doesn't want us to the the military powerhouse he wants us to be equally weak.

 

We know what Obama is. What gets me is the ridiculous notion that genocidal Islamist groups such as ISIS and AQ and meat-packing regimes such as the ones in Iran and North Korea are even remotely interested in Obama's platitudes about a "moral revolution". They're not moral people, and for moral people to even consider disarming in the face of those monsters is beyond dangerous - it's suicidal.

 

No the other cic did

 

Are you claiming Obama directly ordered the bombing of a civilian hospital?

 

No the other obama did

 

No. Why you want me to? Ok based on his track record of violence against Americans I wouldnt be surprised if he gave orders to aim for children. I mean the white house had the coordinates before and during the attack perhaps you could explain why obama kept bombing a hospital 20 minutes after being told the hospital was being hit. Such a man of peace.

 

Vietnam faced down France, the USA, Cambodia, and China, and walked away from them all the victor despite their massive disadvantages. Vietnam won because of the heroic struggle their people waged, not because of protesters asking the imperialists to stop being imperialists.

Obama has actively been involved in the same police state garbage that the Bushes, Reagan, and Clinton did.

Socialism is a lot bigger than nationalizing things.

It makes him a shining example of how reformism is useless.

The private sector is defined by the oppression of the worker by the employer, so yes.

The German Social Democrats killed Rosa Luxemburg. Hell yes Bernstein was scum.

They undermined socialism and sewed the seeds for capitalist reconstruction when they started pushing market liberalisation and the division of labour.

From 1917 to 1953 the USSR exploded from a semi-feudal society to the world's foremost industrial power. In a single lifetime, they were transformed to the point where they were ready to go to space just 10 years later. The revisionists ruined that.

Mises was a troglodyte, and I still uphold the USSR before 1953 as an example of actually existing socialism.

I've yet to hear a refutation of modern Marxism-Leninism-Maoism, which puts forward the advancement that the socialist nature of a state and the power of the people can be upheld by maintaining the power of decentralized workers' organizations and constant criticism and scrutiny towards authority to root out corruption and capitalist roaders.

The old left got things done. They liberated people from the capitalists and the fascists.

The Boomers caused the Reagan era, which set the precedent of ever-increasing capitalist domination over the working class that's caused the Millennials to struggle to get minimum wage jobs that those same boomers declare they don't deserve to make a living from.

 

Vietnam was allowed to win because the U.S. Military was not.

AA

 

What violence against Americans does Obama have a track record on?

Exactly what evidence do you have that the White House was even in the loop on in real time on tactical actions occurring in a war zone?

 

There are no points in the links. They just claim obama is not a socialist. Didn't you read the links? Of course you didn't.

And that's the last of it for me. If you want to pretend you have an argument, then continue to do so, but you have made a fool of yourself.

 

Yes, I did. It's how I know you're lying through your teeth.

Have a great weekend, you silly Marxist.

 

There is only one reason why they hate this man so much, but don't worry they are about to get Donald Trump and when he sends their sons off to war I hope we don't hear one sound out of them.

 

Trump does not have the numbers to win.

AA

 

He let four Americans die for his personal gain. How many times do we have to tell you. And for the love of god...please leftists...grasp what CIC is. Grasp!

 

An honorable POTUS would not visit Hiroshima or Nagasaki or have ANYTHING to say about it, until the Japanese head of state visit's Pearl Harbor to offer an apology for their sneak attack from the Arizona Memorial.

 

Exactly right.

 

Please demonstrate exactly what could have been done in regards to Benghazi in terms of real practical help.

And does this mean that every civilian casualty that occurred when Bush was President that was Bush killing that person?

- - - Updated - - -

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_war_apology_statements_issued_by_Japan

 

Read your link...an apology for Pearl Harbor attack never happened.

 

And also no apology for the Hiroshima attack happened by Obama.

The Japanese have apologized for their conduct during the entire war multiple times.

 

I never said he apologized, I suggested keep his trap shut and not go there at all.

 

He could have been a leader and gotten help to those Americans instead he let them die then tried to cover it up. If you dont think so then provide the forum with the orders he gave that night, when he gave them, and who he gave them to. No one knows except for him and his cankled cow. Casualties in war are different than letting people die for personal gain then covering it up. Secondly if you believe that then why do you support Hillary? She agreed with Bush, Trump didnt.