At Hiroshima Memorial, Obama Says Nuclear Arms Require ‘Moral Revolution’

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/at-hiroshima-memorial-obama-says-nuclear-arms-require-%e2%80%98moral-revolution%e2%80%99/ar-BBtxKyg?li=BBnb7Kz

The most naïve of his followers will believe Obama means well, and that he truly wants humanity to live in a world without nuclear weapons. To those of us who truly understand who and what Obama is, we understand that Obama's true goal is to have a weakened US, and a weakened West, overall. During Obama's Presidency we have seen the rise of ISIS, Iran, China, Cuba, and other 3rd world despotic regimes, all while the US and other Western forces remain on the decline. All according to plan, as Obama is simply making the dreams from his father, which include the colonized nations rising up against their colonizer oppressors, a reality.

The genie is out of the bottle in terms of nuclear weapons. It's not going back in. The world has them. We can wish otherwise, but it doesn't accomplish anything. If we got rid of our nukes, we would always have the technology and knowledge to make more. So do a lot of other countries. We need to maintain our nuclear capabilities as much as possible and develop better technologies for using them, and protecting against other countries who might try and use them. There is no other solution.

>>>MOD EDIT Rule 2 Removed<<<

 

Obama is a hypocrite of the highest order. His actions as POTUS have been immoral in so many ways it's hard to count.

He is immoral, yet lectures about morality. Egads, what a fraud he is.

 

Russia and China wont give up their nuclear weapons because obama hasnt bowed enough....

 

I don't think Obama expects them to. He just wants the West to disarm itself, just like he wants the West to slice its own economic throat with "green energy" scams. I believe he wants other countries to come in and fill the void the US leaves, so that we are on a more even playing field with the rest of the world.

Don't forget, for socialists like Obama, they want worldwide redistribution of wealth and power. He wants the US weaker and the 3rd world stronger. His socialist father wanted the same thing.

 

If obama really wants a moral revolution, he should consider telling the truth occasionally.

 

Our Commie in Chief has no clue that our nukes and military power are the only things standing in the way of his comrades overseas from wiping us out.

 

Obama believes that he, and other progressives like him, hold the keys to unlocking humanity's inner benevolence. If we would only follow their words (never their actions, which often run contrary to their rhetoric), we would have peace and prosperity everywhere.

 

The sad truth is that none of you have presented any evidence that POTUS BO would want the West to disarm, or that he would be a traitor and want the US economy to become a "3rd world ' economy, or that he is somehow a "socialist" as you guys always claim.

None of you based upon your own words have shown even the most minute level of understanding what socialism is.

You have no evidence to support your accusations against POTUS BO and it appears that any evidence that you think you have vaporizes the second you awake from your wet breams about POTUS BO.

 

the evidence has been there everyday for the past 7 years. His ideology of a progressive leftists has been on display consistently. All I've heard from him is how much the US is to blame for damn near everything in the world.

I know libs like Obama, and the useful idiots that worship him and those around him. Many of them are mentally ill (the useful idiots) but most are true leftists that believe that we are the root of all problems in the world and must be cut down to size.

If you really think that today's democrat party is pro USA and her citizens, I have a ocean view condo to sell you in North Dakota.

 

Ahahah, you actually believe Obama's a socialist.

You probably think Bernie is Stalin's most loyal disciple, and I'm probably so far to the left that my existence doesn't even register in your mind.

 

To me immoral is taking from persons who have worked hard and achieved, to give to those that have not even tried.


What's moral to one person can be immoral to another.


Four thousand years ago, fifty years ago, or today, what was or is seen as moral in one society, could be far different than another.

IMO, Obama's vision of morality, namely that each human should be cared for by others, even it were possible, disregards the human desire to achieve, which by itself has evolved the human to what exist today, in a few hundred years. That is take that element away and we're back to the middle ages.

 

I'm referring mostly to D'Souza's work in 2016. In my opinion, he lays out a convincing argument for Obama's true motivations, which revolve around Obama's relationship with his father, as well as his upbringing in life.

Your "nuh uh!" dismissals are probably impressive to some. Good luck with that.

- - - Updated - - -

Mod Edit - Reply to Off topic

 

Obama's upbringing was that of an Islander - and Hawaiians don't walk around with sticks up their arses afraid of
every bump in the night like some conservative poster on this forum. Their's is a more relaxed attitude toward life. If you have mistaken
that lack of paranoia as "hating America," then the problem is in your court - not his.

We have more than enough warheads with multiple delivery systems to be credible nuclear deterrent - how many more do you need
to satisfy your paranoia?

 

Isnt this the same Obama that recently bombed a hospital killing 22 people burning children alive in their beds?

 

Can't be true, because I'm sure if that happened, Code Pink and other anti-war leftists would have been all over it.

 

I'm not going to stop laughing at your grossly inaccurate understanding of the political spectrum.

 

Hilarious.

Who launches their political career in the living room of an unrepentant communist terrorist?

Who nihilistically pledges to fundamentally transform the United States of America?

Who passes legislation aimed at bringing elements of the private sector under government control?

Who tells business owners "You didn't build that!" and spends 8 years punishing them with higher taxes and more government regulations and control?

Evidently, we're supposed to believe Obama is an Austrian School libertarian, not some socialist charlatan who portrays himself as a "progressive" to the public.

You're a Commie. Do you remember what the Soviets called their fellow travelers in the West?

I do. They called them "progressives".

Don't be absurd. Stalin died before Obama was born.

And in case you haven't noticed, the New Left is becoming more like the Old Left with each passing year...
.

 

Laughable bare assertions with nothing of substance to back it up. Yawn.

A. Chine was already around before Obama, Cuba isn't particularly rising and ISIS is a creation of the instability created by invading Iraq. Not at all surprised these salient facts make you uncomfy.
B. The US and Western forces are not in 'decline'. Simply saying it's so won't magically make it so.

There is no evidence of any such plan that colonized nations have been 'rising up' for quite some time now, long before Obama. That you want to associate that solely with his time in office only shows your desperation and laughable historical illiteracy.

You can relax. He's not getting rid of our nuclear weapons.

>>>MOD EDIT Deleted Comment and response Removed<<<

 

“That bomb caused the Japanese to surrender, and it stopped the war. I don’t care what the crybabies say now, because they didn’t have to make the decision.” Truman

Cheers

Sent from my SM-T900 using Tapatalk

 

Obama ordered that bombing?

- - - Updated - - -

Can we discuss the fact that just a few days ago, Rightwing posters on this site claimed with absolute certainty that Obama would apologize for the bombings?

He did not. Not even close.

Can we now agree that the ODS of the Right is so strong that they are completely divorced from reality due to their hatred?

 

First of your links: simply states obama is not a socialist, offers no proof or evidence at all, and quickly moves to claiming obama is the best President ever . FAILURE

Second of your links: continuation of your first link, simply states Obama is not a socialist, offers no proof or evidence at all. FAILURE

First of your links: continuation of your second link, simply states Obama is not a socialist, offers no proof or evidence at all. FAILURE

Did you even read your links before posting them, or did the big words and scary graphs put you off?

 

Checking In with President Nobel Peace Prize…

"depending upon who you ask, the death toll in the Iraq War was 151,000 to one million... [while] the death toll in Syria's civil war has reached 152,000 to 470,000"

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/435953/checking-president-nobel-peace-prize

 

Did they use that big word "tried" that you can't seem to spell correctly?

Do you know who Derek Thompson is, sport?

ROFL - Why am I not surprised that you trotted out a hack from the Leftist NAF to defend Obama?

Let's pluck a random sampling from your "scary" links:

Yawn. Please educate yourself. I know, it's asking the impossible of the incapable, but now that I'm through flinging your immature rhetoric back in your face, let me help you out:

The president isn't in charge of state and local spending.

Here's another shocking revelation that educated people can share with you - the POTUS isn't a monarch, even though Obama acts like one. The POTUS doesn't possess singular authority and control over federal spending. He shares that with a thing called C-O-N-G-R-E-S-S.

Now, I noticed that all you could do is cut and paste something off the Internet from an NAF hack to "support" your argument, but you conveniently failed to address the inconvenient questions I posed to CB.

I realize that this requires you to think for yourself, but go ahead and give it a try. It might not kill you...

 

Thanks for admitting you didn't click the links.

Good of you to admit you're only trolling, as usual.

 

No doubt that an action that you support. Reports of terrorists in the building, "who cares about collateral damage."

Obama is just following the same foreign policy as all the other presidents before him. BTW, he did not bomb the hospital.