Are you Wikileaks or American?

EVERY candidate for president has had to explain him/herself.

Do you honestly think the only people who have been elected are people who have not explained themself?

What on Earth are you talking about?

The election is between two things...but not the two you listed.

The election is between an intelligent, competent, capable, experienced person (Hillary Clinton)...and a not especially intellignet, competent, capable...totally inexperienced person (Donald Trump.)

I expect Hillary Clinton to win.

 

Wikileaks wants to spread propaganda that Hillary is a criminal Wikileaks actions is an attack on the USA saying that the USA is a criminal nation. Wikileaks corrupt it is under the umbrella of Russia, Wikileaks has refused to go after China, North Korea, Iran, Russia or even Trump.

Hillary is the worthiest presidential candidate she has a tract record of paying taxes and serves the interest of the USA.

 

The FBI is re-investigating Hillary's emails not because she is a criminal but to find out and go after Wikileaks sources to authenticate Wikileaks connections and other sleeper agents. The only way Wikileaks could have obtained top secret information is from internal spies, moles and enemy agents planted and infiltrated the USA that is what the FBI is investigating.

Replaced the commie to Wikileaks
[video=youtube;AWeZ5SKXvj8]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AWeZ5SKXvj8[/video]

 

Assange is pro Russia, pro Trump, pro dictators that is why he leaves China, Saudi Arabia, Iran, Russia alone.

 

LOL your post is nothing but Hilary propaganda.

If Russia really wanted something from the USA, Putin would want Hilary to win, then he could just make a "contribution" to the Clinton Foundation and buy whatever he wants.

Don't you people ever think before creating your propaganda? At least try to make your lies believable.

 

Your response above shows us that you are living in a liberal bubble ignoring factual information.

Steve

 

Oh stop it. Propaganda talking points from the DNC. Who is the most powerful country on earth?

 

Funny no one asked during the Manning case, "Are you gay, or are you American?"

 

I'm about TRUTH! You?

 

Hillary seems like a good person.

 

Compared to who? Pol Pot? I'll agree with you there, otherwise I'm not seeing it.

I'm not even pro-trump, but come on now.

 

You wrote:

I explained that your comment is absurd, because every candidate, winner or loser, has to explain themselves and their positions.

Not sure where you are going with this...but you are going there in the dark.

 

No, you were trying to change the subject that I reposted again above. Let's watch Clinton and democrats lose this election because you people continually try to change the subject and avoid the crux of your problems. Let's also watch how many democrat candidates turn to avoid Clinton in the next few days. In case you try that trick again, it has to do with the corruption of Clinton, the democrats and our government for not carefully investigating Clinton.

Steve

 

WikiLeaks is like a online crack house. Once you get addicted, you can't stop. And like a crack house, it wouldn't necessarily get along with the law.

Any American who cares for America disavows WikiLeaks, disavows Snowden and Assange, and turns their nose on government whistleblowing in general.

 

If the net result is nothing it is because all the witnesses that were ready to testify miraculously died of accidents, suicide, or were outright murdered.

- - - Updated - - -

Wow. Talk about willful blindness.

 

Well, here's the thing. If you honor the age-old system of how our elections are supposed to work, you don't condone of any outside inference with the election. And that outside inference includes WikiLeaks.

 

So Hillary's acceptance of foreign contributions, notably from Saudi Arabia, means nothing to you?

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-...esidential-campaign-saudi-crown-prince-claims

 

Hey, at least its better than Trump touting he's self-funding his campaign, when its so obvious that he is not.

 

But shouldn't corruption be exposed? If the truth comes out then that truth needs to be dealt with. Is anyone suggesting that it should be discounted?

 

You apparently are not capable of seeing your own logical inconsistency.

Do you really not care that if 20% of Hillary's contributions toward her presidential campaign are from Saudi Arabia, that means she is enormously indebted to them and her policies will reflect that?

 

Two things come to mind when I see this thread. Isnt it kind of funny that someone from Canada is bellyaching about someone from Russia.

Second does it matter where the TRUTH comes from, as long as everyone has the truth. Only democrats seem to want to suppress the truth.

 

This is nationalism vs globalism. Globalism will collapse from the inside (civil unrest), nationalism can collapse from outside influences, but it seems unlikely for the US, I vote trump. WW3 seems highly unlikely when you investigate the wikileaks and you see the economic and political ties between Podesta (Hillary Clinton) and Russia and in general. These disputes are simply over geographical rich regions with no intent to go further. Putin has nothing to do with the wikileaks, but based on his financial ties to Hillary, my guess is that he is on Hillary's side and the wikileaks undermined his strategy. Simply why would our government's special interests who makes tons of money from Russia select someone who would want to threaten that financial tie? It wouldn't. And why would Putin say Hillary elect is an act of war? Well duh, he has to convince his people that hes a good guy, and naturally people in the US may sway towards Hillary because Putin threatened their election. Then the smoking gun? The government further pushing the idea that Trump is an ally with Putin, not Hillary, which she is. If you are not an idiot, it is so obvious that the media industrial complex is pushing Hillary, and they are failing. Their over sampled polls are totally false, outdated (only use landlines) and underestimate the motivation of likely voters for trump and underestimate the low energy to wait on a long line to vote for hillary. There is a ton of election rigging going on, and they even tried to federalize the election and failed. I believe poll watchers will prevail, hacking for Clinton can make the election close, but a Trump win is likely. If you think Trump is unfit, I highly doubt that. Generals can deal with war strategy, we are currently funding ISIS, we will now destroy ISIS, much easier. An economic collapse is very likely as well, the special interest will release all their grenades, don't keep too much money in the bank, we may have bank runs for a while, but no big deal, the cost is well worth it to drain the swamp

 

All Wikileaks is, is the unlaundered Blue Dress proving once more that the Clintons are a bunch of Lying Grifters. We are "disgruntled" because we are sick of those that are supposed serve us, lying to us and robbing us blind.

And now thanks to A. Weiner sexting a 15 year old girl, the FBI has reopened their criminal investigation of the lying besotted drunken corrupt, can barely stand up, Hillary Clinton.

Priceless!

 

I am pro-truth. To be otherwise is immoral.

 

"A. Weiner" . . . aka, "Carlos Danger." Ha-ha-ha!

Steve