If the truth is meant to come out, it will come out by authorized, legal sources. Both of which WikiLeaks is not.
Still posting against the truth coming out I see. The truth is the truth no matter where it comes from. And the truth is -----------Hillary is a crooked lying witch. Live with it!!!!!!
Clinton III: 4 More Years of Special Prosecutors. May be time to cancel my newspaper subscription and migrate from cable to online TV.
Right.... baseless and unsubstantiated accusations of a domestic porn star is an important factor, mountains of irrefutable evidence of a candidate's corruption and criminal activity should on the other hand be completely ignored because they are coming from a "wrong" source and because the FBI has been "persuaded" to drop the case. Duh, let's elect a criminal based on the lies of a port star. You libs are unbelievable.
Translation: Wikileaks and Project Veritas are destroying Hillary's bid for the presidency and Leftists, who want to win no matter the cost to this nation, are becoming hysterical and -- ironically -- are now looking for reds-under-the-bed; the reds that they used to embrace not so very long ago. Grow accustomed to saying "President Trump."
Because after all getting the Al Capone of Dem Party politics elected is a noble endeavor and will enrich the nation and the moral integrity of government no end. Sheesh!
The truth is the truth---------------no matter where it comes from. Isnt it amazing how the truth always leaks out!!!!!!
Okay, a more honest source. I wouldn't take ANYTHING from WikiLeaks for face value, even if my life depended on it. Give it to ABC, and I'll look over it. Whistleblowers are insecure, attention wh*res. Don't pay attention, and they'll just crawl back into their parents basement.
You mean after the Mainstream Media -- which Wikileaks has proven WORKS for the Dem Party -- has sanitized all that information for the average low-information Dem? Sweet! - - - Updated - - - Hillary is scum, and if she becomes president then the Dems will have knowingly placed EVIL into the Oval Office.
Hillary seems like a good snake. Good people are beginning to recognize this fact. Maybe. But that will just mean that Americans chose to elect a snake. For some, this is a revelation; for others, nothing new... Ditto. And we certainly won't get transparent government by electing Hillary Clinton. I applauded the deepthroat source during the Nixon years, I applaud WikiLeaks today. The difference? Back in the Nixon days, it was the media that went after getting the facts. Today? Just the opposite. First, I too find input by the world audience a bit funny. And second, transparency in government is antithetical to the way Hillary Clinton thinks. A new low has now been reached on the bar for becoming a "worthy" presidential candidate: must pay taxes. News flash: Hillary Clinton will serve the interest of exactly one American, and that's Hillary Clinton. (Maybe you really meant "worthlessest", in which case we'd only have to work on your grammar...). If new evidence comes to light, it's incumbent on the FBI to re-open the investigation. That's the way it should work, right? And that says it all. Good luck prosecuting that case, Madam Secretary; I think you may be elected president, but if you think after doing so you'll be able to put this genie back in the bottle, you're hugely mistaken.
The free flow of information is crucial to the existence of any democratic form of government. I'll take Wikileaks over people like you anytime.
WikiLeaks is a criminal organization, the media is not. That's just for starters. But hey, even if Hillary were put in the pen, Assange wouldn't be alone.
When are they going to chant-----------------better red than dead -----------------like they did years ago.
Your post reminds me of the saying about some animals eating their own. This BOMBSHELL news about the FBI AGAIN investigating Hillary has you so out of sorts you are attacking your own, the basement dwelling liberal college students that took insane majors so no one will hire them. You need to calm down take a valium, or have a few shot of booze to collect your thots before you post again.
One has to wonder about your thought process. Basically, in your world, Wikileaks is a criminal organisation purely because they expose criminals acts of politicians you support. Are you saying that exposing criminals is a criminal act?
Steve, your comment: ...is asinine. I pointed it out. You should have acknowledged that it was (because it obviously IS)...and moved on. Instead, you are ranting and raging. Okay...that is your right. So enjoy it. I am!