Actually Xn theologian Descartes changed it to " I think I am" but in any way it is a very good start point and I am glad you are with us. The test found you not to be absent. Negative is proven.
And all objections were hilariously destroyed and humiliated by you and others on other threads, correct?
No they are not. Not believing in something is not a belief in and of itself. your premise is abysmally stupid
You just have expressed the blind belief I submitted a premise and it is Not believing in something is a belief. This belief of yours has no roots in reality as everyone can check.
Wrong not believing in something IS NOT a belief. You are wrong and attempting a contradictory strawman. So you are wrong and you know it. move on
Atheists believe that I ever said that not believing in something IS a belief. And they insist on their belief like true fanatics.
Two guys walk into one another. Then one of them says "Hey, Tom!" The other answers "Steve?" The first one answers "No, I am not Steve" To which the second one retorques "I am not Tom neither". So, after a while, both shrug and conclude "So, it isn't us".
Sure, as I said Atheists believe that I ever said that not believing in something IS a belief. And they insist on their belief like true fanatics.
Sure, as I said Atheists believe that I ever wrote that not believing in something IS a belief. And they insist on their belief like true fanatics.
Sure, as I said Atheists believe that I ever said that not believing in something IS a belief. And they insist on their belief like true fanatics.