Why the Right Wing Rejects Science

Your point is that science creates hypothesis that are tested and then falsified or verified and that because some can be falsified none of them can be verified? This is gibberish. Then you go far into left field and talk about some person who used a model to predict NY would be underwater...It is impossible to argue with a fool because when you do, you must enter his mind in order to understand him. I am done with you.

 

Uh, ya, women understand what "pregnant" means....and what "abortion" means, they aren't as stupid as you seem to suggest...

 

Question: What is your point?

Even if the world agreed that "life starts at conception" that has nothing to do with women's right to kill it.

 

Science creates nothing. Hypotheses are generated by individuals and then confirmed by observation and/or experimentation. The hypothesis stands until it is falsified again by experimentation and/or observation. That is the scientific method.

Resorting to insults and name calling indicates a lack of understanding.

 

Many pro abortion advocates claim that abortion does not terminate a human life. How stupid are they ??

 

My point is just that - regardless of legality abortion terminates a human life. The vast majority of pro abortion advocates do not consider abortion a termination of a human life.

 

A. There are NO "Pro-Abortion advocates" but there are Pro-Choice/Pro-women's rights advocates.





B. SHOW PROOF THAT PRO-CHOICERS claim that abortion does not terminate a human life.



That is the POINT of abortion.....

 

A. There are NO "Pro-Abortion advocates" but there are Pro-Choice/Pro-women's rights advocates.





B. SHOW PROOF THAT PRO-CHOICERS claim that abortion does not terminate a human life.



That is the POINT of abortion.....

 

Pro choice means pro abortion.

Come'on man ?? Are you seriously claiming that Pro Abortion Advocates consider an unborn fetus a human life ??

 

OK - Claim: "Human life begins prior to conception" Since this can not be falsified your claim that human life begins at conception is false.

Thanks for coming out.

 

That's not SHOWING PROOF THAT PRO-CHOICERS claim that abortion does not terminate a human life.









Pro-Choice means Pro-Choice....just because word meaning has so little room in your life that doesn't change words or facts.

 

Saying "something is true because it can not be falsified" - is asking to prove a negative. Do not blame me that you do not understand this logical fallacy.

 

I agree that conception results in human life. So does sperm creation. Since the sperm comes before conception, conception is not the beginning.

 

Just because something is "human life" ... does not make that something a human.

You should learn the difference between the descriptive adjective form of the word "Human" (Human cell, Human heart, Human sperm" ... and the noun form "a Human".

 

So you can neither break down how exactly I'm wrong nor explain what kind of facts you are looking for? In that case, I will have a nice day!

 

"Projection" accusing someone of doing what you are doing.
Posts are infected with it here

 

Love how the anti abortion people are always old white farts.
Members of the "zip it up, see you later" group

 

Are the anti science warming guys still quoting very few climate scientists and lots of psychologists? Do we really have to list the reams of scientific organizations in favor?
Sort of like one guy arguing across the table with another about creationism and evolution. Gives the impression that the arguments are equal

 

We have to go on the vast majority of climate scientists.
I wonder how many critics here are climate scientists?
Know what they say "opinions are like aholes, everybody has one"

 

You're not one of his record breaking jailed bunch are you?

 

It doesn't?

So you think that mothers have the right to kill their babies whenever they want? Is that only when the baby is inside their body? Or do you not draw the line there?

But man, lol, wow, this is basically proving those on the far right that their claims of "Liberals wanting the ability to kill babies" as true.

As a Pro-Choicer I suggest you not use this argument when debating abortions.

 

Or another guy arguing how mothers should be able to kill their babies whenever they feel like it?

 

FoxHastings said: ↑
Question: What is your point?

Even if the world agreed that "life starts at conception" that has nothing to do with women's right to kill it."""

No, it doesn't. Women have the right to do with their body what they choose just as you do. WHEN life starts has nothing to do with it.

Sounds like you haven't a clue what abortion is. It isn't killing "babies", it's killing zygotes or fetuses. YOU may call it a baby but YOU can't change what it really is.

Of course it's when the fetus is inside their bodies...NO one has said anything different ...that goes back to you having no idea what abortion is.

World class drooling with not one shred of evidence to back it up....you have no proof that "Liberals want to kill babies"

Don't have to , have never done so....your confusion is not my argument...

 

WHERE is that? WHO said that? I did NOT see anyone saying mothers should be able to kill their babies at any time....if they did they'd be wrong but I doubt you have any proof they did...

 

lol oh dear, resorting to trying to call me "stoopid" now that I have asked you about your view of a "woman's right to kill it."

I was quoting you my child, once again, someone who stated "... has nothing with a woman's right to kill it". Your words genius, not mine. I personally see a huge difference between a woman getting an abortion and killing their child and would never use the words you used.

You just contradicted yourself in your own post, tough to debate with people who lack the intelligence to have such a discussion. <Mod Edit- Rule 3>