pedophiles going public

Yes he can.

 

That is what I can say about you.

 

LMAO...Her "special friend"?
If you like ****ing children, you ain't going to get much sympathy from normal adults.

 

Why special?

You cannot like what you've never done.

 

https://www.counseling.org/docs/dis...ng-term-effects-of-childhood-sexual-abuse.pdf

https://aifs.gov.au/cfca/publicatio...abuse/impact-child-sexual-abuse-mental-health

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/somatic-psychology/201303/trauma-childhood-sexual-abuse

http://www.unh.edu/ccrc/pdf/VS69.pdf

http://www.aaets.org/article176.htm

Now...after all that, would you mind telling the forum members in this thread why you think that a child should be having sex an adult?

 

Never mind. I just read the thread you started in Law and Justice wherein you say...

So your simple, biased, unresearched opinion holds more worth that the reams of psychological data collected during the treatment of the victims of sexual abuse. That you feel that children should be engaging in an activity that we have found to be emotionally damaging to them...causing at times...Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. Fine. Believe what you will. But if you ever cross the line from opinion to action...don't expect sympathy when you face the consequences of said actions.

 

Please, quote where it has been said that adult partners use coercion more often on average than young ones? That was your claim that I asked giving me studies for.

Please, stop using this type of wording. And I already answered:

I already answered this multiple times: there is no studies proving that sex with adults in childhood causes psychological problems in later life. There are only studies proving correlation between sex with adults in childhood and problems in later life. And correlation does not imply causation. You cannot claim that ice cream consumption causes drownings even if there is a strong correlation between ice cream sales and drowning deaths.

 

Dictorial progress of 5 unelected lawyers telling 300 million people what to do

 

And if all homosexuality involved anal sex, you'd have a point.

 

for somebody who professes to possess a superior intelligence, I find it rather amusing that you conflate the extension of equal legal and civil rights to consenting adults with the sexual predation of children. Can't get much more intellectually dishonest than that.

Once again you attempt to equate homosexuality with pedophilia. Guess what? Its even illegal for HETROSEXUALS to engage in sex with children of the opposite sex, or are you unaware of such laws.

Here's a tip smart guy. You should clean your ears regularly to prevent wax buildup from effecting your hearing.

 

And where did you get your degree in statistics from? Where did you conduct your statistical study?

 

I have a program to help them. Its called bullet to the back of the head.

I make no excuses for my extreme bigotry when it comes to these scumbag sexual predators of children. If one moved next door to me, you can be damn sure I'll lead the ostracization charge. If as you say its merely a "normal" expression of "primal sexual urges" then lets castrate the bastards.

 

I think your objection doesn't eliminate my point.

 

Now you conflate sexual deviance with the human food chain? Boy are you smrt.

 

Those 5 duly appointed Supreme Court Justices upheld that the rights of the individual must be paramount over the tyranny of the majority.

 

I don't profess anything. I use a screenname given to my by daughter years ago. I also don't care about your characterizations of what you consider 'intellectually dishonest'. The post stands on its merits. As has been predicted, eroding the moral boundaries of societally accepted behavior for one deviant group erodes it for them all, and these chickens are roosting.

How, again, can you build a logical argument legally opposing bestiality, when you've succeeded in removing the legal and moral obstacles to homosexual sex? Animals cannot consent either - that's your argument for pedophilia, after all - yet we eat animals. Do they consent to being eaten?

Logical consistency now demands that you cede that there is no argument against bestiality that you can muster. Even if you - deep inside, where you've driven your conscientious objector - find it abhorrent.

What willfully obtuse deflection. I'm not equating homosexuality with pedophilia. They are two entirely different things. I am equating the relevant social and legal boundaries that existed against BOTH, and how the former had its boundaries torn down, and how that affects the push to normalize other deviant behaviours.

Thanks for the tip. I'm fine though. If you cannot address the content of the argument, do something else.

 

Do you understand what it means to conflate?

And if you'd ever like to compare your level of intelligence to mine, I'm more than game.

 

What in the name of Zeus's butthole do you think I posted? Paula Deen's infamous "Needs three pounds of butter" recipes? Those links are studies of the damage caused when adults **** children.

You're the one who said "I don't find scientific researches can be trusted here, because of tremendous sensitivity of the topic, it make them susceptible to multiple biases. Plus there is no any established theory explaining this hypothetical damage, so it's still is just a hypothesis."...

...meaning that you don't believe them because you do not want to believe them.

Why do you feel that children should be allowed to have sex with adults? Why do you believe in exposing children to something they're not biologically ready for? Why do you believe that a child has not developed the emotional and mental capability to understand should be having sex with adults? Why do you feel the need to end the innocence of childhood just so some adult who can't be arsed to look for sexual partners in their own peer group can find a pre-pubescent to shove his dick into? Why do you think it's right that Warren Earl Yerger had the right to perform sexual acts on one boy and three girls who were all under the age of 10. Why do you think Jerry Sandusky had the right to coerce 45 children by offering them treats and tickets to Penn State sporting events in exchange for sexual acts and their silence about it?

Answer that.

 

What if you're wrong?

 

Then I'd be wrong, wouldn't I? Just like you would be if your belief was proven wrong.

 

Right in front of Jonsa's nose, you have a perfect example of deviancy emboldened to publicize their views; to brashly lobby on their behalf. Here is a pedophile on a public forum arguing in favor of normalizing the deviancy, while Jonsa insists there is no normalizing going on.

In the past, posters such as Landcover would be grateful for a rock for cover, and would venture out only in shadows.

But no smoke here; Jonsa and other leftists like Questerr and Te cannot connect the dots to the trapdoor of deviancy that they have had a hand in opening. They may as well throw a temper tantrum instead of the flaccid argument laced with intentionally obtuse denial they've offered.

 

So you have no clue whatsoever as to what it means for an ADULT to grant INFORMED CONSENT?

Can an adult female grant informed consent to engage in sexual intercourse? Yes or no?

Can an adult male grant informed consent to engage in sexual intercourse? Yes or no?

Can a minor child grant informed consent to engage in sexual intercourse? Yes or no?

Can an animal grant informed consent to engage in sexual intercourse? Yes or no?

Explain exactly how two informed consenting adults engaging in sexual intercourse is exactly the same as a pedophile sexually molesting a minor child?

Explain exactly how two informed consenting adults engaging in sexual intercourse is exactly the same as a pervert engaging in bestiality?

Because that is the asinine false equivalence that your "mensa mind" is alleging here.

 

Yes I do know what conflate means. grab a dictionary and educate yourself.

I have made no claim to you regarding MY level of intelligence. but you have made a claim about yours.

I shall make one now - I easily qualified to join Mensa thirty years ago but fell somewhat short (51 points iirc) for the Giga society.

But then again, as WC fields once said "I'd never be a member of a club that would accept me as a member".

 

You and chicken little have much in common it seems.

As to calling Landcover a pedophile, do you have any proof of such a lurid accusation? Or is it just that the chosen subject of his sjw activities is repugnant to you?

I keep waiting for you to demonstrate that Mensa mind of yours. good thing I ain't holdin' my breath.

 

No, they're not, there is no evidences, and correlation is not an evidence.

And that is true.

I don't need to believe anything, I need to view facts and use logic. Though do I believe them or not doesn't matter, because as I said there is no scientific evidences that sex harms children, there is only correlation between sex and harm. Correlation is not a proof of cause, do you want me to repeat it again?

Because you don't need to forbid things that makes no harm. Will you argue with that?

I already said multiple times that I don't agree that "they're not biologically ready for".

For the same reason child should be able to hug adults or be hugged. You don't need to be able to understand, you need only to be able to feel.

Sex doesn't end the innocence of childhood.

There will be no problem with that if prostitution will be legal and available for everyone.

I don't know these people, sorry, I cannot express my opinion of them.

It seems like you're asking too many new question, while failing to solve and discuss original "sex/hug problem".