pedophiles going public

It is not. Can you not commit to an answer? Your answer allows me to continue with my point.

Of course, it isn't in your best interest to have me continue with my point, is it? You're not here to test your ideology. You're here to attack others and have no interest in securing the correctness of your views.

The rest of us do it in much the same way the Scientific Method operates: we are constantly testing it, and experimenting through these discussions. Falsification validates belief.

You aren't doing that. You're running away. Do you hate science, Te?

I'll ask you again: is killing more or less severe a crime than sexual molestation?

 

Homosexual Australian tries to buy 6 year-old boy for sex in Los Angeles. Arrested.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...Quinn-active-dating-sites-left-Australia.html

Came to the U.S. to meet up with "other pervs."

Accused Australian paedophile was 'active on dating sites' before he was arrested in Los Angeles for 'arranging to have sex with a six year old boy'

• Michael John Quinn was arrested at a Los Angeles hotel last weekend
• Quinn dropped an attempt to apply for bail in Los Angeles court on Friday
• It is alleged he flew from Australia in hopes of meeting 'other pervs'
• The trap was set after he allegedly 'chatted on paedophile website'
• The IVF scientist travelled to the US for the rugby union Bingham Cup

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ating-sites-left-Australia.html#ixzz4kwDLMV3e

 

Atta boy.

Now ask Derideo why he cannot draw the same tardy conclusion you did.

 

Finally some brutal honesty. I couldn't disagree with your opinion more. But damn I commend your style. I abhor the individual that dances around the points and makes it sound nice and justified when in reality having your view. So kudos to you and thank you. I digress.

I'd say yours is a primal reaction and a common one. Those that harm children should get the harshest of punishments. I think, however, this pushes people to bottle up their desires and hide behind a mask of normalcy. Until of course they're overwhelmed and they do something repugnant. I don't defend the offenders of children.

I'd want to know who's out there that hasn't acted yet. I'd want them to be comfortable enough to come out and say "hey doc, I have these bad thoughts, XYZ.. these urges just won't go away." "Okay, here's a few things you can try as an outlet, a child sex doll, internet groups, computer role playing." Whatever it would take to save a child. You cannot convict a person that hasn't done anything.

Just like with disease, the best medicine is prevention. Find these people, get them help and outlets, and study those willing. The best way to fight an issue is to understand it's workings. Pedophiles will always be there. The more we know the better equipped we are to handle and integrate them.

This is why we disagree. I understand your view, and if I had a child that was a victim or if I was a victim, I would probably have your view. Perhaps relativism makes me disconnected. I don't know. But I think your solution will not solve the problem.

 

I realize its hard for some people to differentiate between a pedophile and a homosexual, so I'm not surprised you'd mischaracterize this particular pervert.

who knew that Cracker Jacks was including chemical engineering degrees in selected boxes?

 

I was/am a Trumpette as you so rudely put it. That said, to associate pedophilia to conservatives is stereotypical bullshit. I and all others I know who voted for Trump totally abhor pedophilia and agree with your first statement that the scumbags deserve a bullet to the back of the head.

But I find it ridiculous that even when discussing a subject that most everyone agree and therefore for some refreshing moment we can all come together on, you had to make it political showing your hatred for the other side of the aisle as well. You have issues and need to get some help before you go postal on someone.

 

I make no apologies for my bigotry.

There is absolutely NOTHING stopping any pedophile from seeking professional medical help (psychiatric or otherwise) right now, regardless of the social stigma of their perversion.

I will never condemn anyone for "thought crimes" - the notion that any thought is a crime is ludicrous to me. My hatred is reserved for those that act out on those thoughts. I believe that Fear of getting a bullet in the back of the head would be an effective deterrent for many seeking to act out - but hey that's just me.

 

This isn't something new. There have always been groups like MAMBLA/MAMGLA which spoke out for pedophiles. It doesn't mean that we have to listen to them. And the OP's attempts to claim that this is something the left wants, and their attempts to compare it to gays is the same old "If we let ******s get married we have to let people **** kids and dogs too" BS.

 

landcover;

Molested children molesting other children is zombie apocalypse fiction?

Sadly no. Pychiatric studies have verified this. If you think about it. Young children do imitate the adults around them. Why wouldn't they imitate it with their friends?

 

Well show me one then. I'll wait.

 

Is that 'deviancy' from the norm (heterosexual marriage/cohabitation), or 'deviancy' used as a pejorative?

 

Depends on how far back you want to go. Up until the 19th century paedophilia was not even a word, and it was certainly not recognised as a psychiatric condition. There is still a large component of society who consider homosexuals as 'weirdos' and 'sinners'.

 

Homosexuals are messed up people? Why do you think that?

 

Equal rights for sexual perverts?

If the courts say so thats how it is

But the people used to have better sense

 

Yes.If they are prosecuted for a criminal offence they have the right to defend themselves in court the same as you and I. Those rights are read to them upon arrest. Miranda, etc.

 

Ironic since you have yet to provide any substantive argument yourself.

Inanities like "morality" and "right or wrong" are just puerile deflections on your part.

Since everything is partisan in your myopic point of view you have nothing of substance to contribute to this topic.

 

BZZZT Wrong again to no one's surprise!

And yes I agree that the partisan delusions of the alleged "mensa mind" are a bottomless pit.

 

I've asked for evidence of these allegedly 'pro-pedophile' posts, but none seems to be forthcoming, so far.

 

That you bring nothing of substance means that your puerile deflections have no merit.

That you continue to pursue them to no avail is hardly surprising given the obsession of the alleged "mensa mind" on inane off topic trivialities.

The OP failed miserably to establish their bogus partisan allegation and a nonpartisan alliance to expose the poster advocating pedophilia was successful in that endeavor.

That you entirely missed what happened and continue to flail around in an aimless manner is just par for the course on this and all other topics.

Have a nice day!

 

Probably because they only "exist" in the "mensa mind" and nowhere else.

 

You know the reasons why without me having to tell you

The sad fact is it does not matter what I think

The only opinion that matters is that of 5 unelected demigods on the supreme court

And one day they might wake upnanf discover that the Constitution gives children the right to have sex with adults

And after that just like homosexuality the subject is closed

 

Are you trying to conflate same sex attraction with paedophilia? Try to answer without 'unnatural', 'against god's teachings' and see if you can come up with a reason other than, 'I think homosexuality is icky'.

 

What if Melania grabbed your penis?

 

Well duh!

no one is trying to take those kind of rights except maybe for muslims who throw homosexuals off of tall buildings

But society has a right to decide what is or isn't a legal marriage

Or at least it did before the liberal judges took over