The English baby that the British health plan want to kill should tell everyone a lot

No I think you forgot you started on about doctors kiddnapping this child, I just do not think you are as clever as you want to be!

 

You get that here too. Or do you suppose we have the one horse which we pass between ourselves?

 

Bullshit

there is no grand conspiracy

 

So you're going on record that at the NHS hospital no nhs doctors provided care to a family without means? Do tell, do tell. Come off it.

 

If you are really terminal you should have checked into a hospital. It might have saved your life.

 

Who said there was? If you haven't read the whole thread, kindly refrain from commenting until you understand what is being discussed, or at least from quoting me and distracting me with your inanity.

 

Right, now I understand, he thinks "they" are out to kill the child.

I simply could not understand where he was coming from.

 

You have less in private situations than in public

I know Australia has a dual system and I have worked in both

Private health care revolves around that primary treating medical officer - public is a team approach

 

I doubt it thirty years ago!

 

I think that I have smoked you out sufficiently. Your agenda is clear.

 

Seriously, do you think this judge, wants to hurt the parents or the child?

 

I've been hospitalized multiple times and my mother is a nurse practitioner. Before that she was an rn for 25 years. I'm aware if how my own system works, thank you for your kind condescension Lady Catherine Deburg.
You have a specialist for everything, then a primary and generally also a hospitalist (hospitals doctor) available. If one of those is unsure they consult another of their type who must see you etc.
Been there. Done that. Got several t shirts.

 

Should have taken another trip when you were diagnosed.

 

Lol yeah sure sparky. Care to share with the class?

 

No I think he is a stranger with no particular connection or feeling to the child at all, who had a tar baby of a problem dropped on his lap, which means he lacks a considerable thing when making decisions in loco parentis. It doesn't have to be a conspiracy or malice for him to not be the best choice.

 

Death scares you that much? You should try living.

 

If judges could be trusted we would not need juries.

 

It does not scare me at all I am not terminal. Your death, obviously, does not scare me at all.

 

What does he lack?

 

OK, stay happy with that. By the way we are all terminal, death and taxes!

 

LOL! Is that why you consider yourself "terminal"? No wonder you don't care about Charlie G.

 

We do not need Juries in this case.

 

You see, you simply cannot comprehend I could care about Charlie and not agree with you!

 

Any connection to the person whose interests he is purporting to represent. Hard to represent interests you have no personal knowledge of.

 

What interests do you think a brain damaged child has?