Reviewing Atheist 'Lack Belief' in Deities theory. <<MOD WARNING ISSUED>>

So your whole premise is shoot the messenger because the messenger is not a lacker after lackers get their asses handed to them and no longer have any rational arguments.

Its official the lacker gas tank is empty.

 

There you go again, making your own assumptions, claiming them to be true and trying to insult your way out of the challenge.

Your attempts at furthering your falsehoods have indeed grown pathetic and old.

 

I have no need to respond to anyones fallacies, redd herrings, or unsupported irrational fantasies. citation please.

 

Citations? How about all of your claims to "know" the actual truth and insisting that only you know the truth? Ignoring plain statements by others to insist that you and only you know the "truth"? These, among all of your other false claims.

 

Nothing yet huh.
Still waiting for your citations of 'truth' .

 

You do realize that there is no such thing, other than in your imagination, as a "lacker" right?

Find it in a dictionary

Why? You provide none and never have. It is your way of doing things.

 

Adverb huh? Brilliant!

Guess you are wrong again, keep up the good work!

lacker
Noun
(plural lackers)

1. One who is lacking, or in want.

Read more at http://www.yourdictionary.com/lacker#8ZCG9C2CY6yuqHWY.99

 

155 pages and atheism still means.............lack of belief in a god or gods.

 

155 pages and atheist is still a person who 'believes in' God's nonexistence.

 

nope. an atheist lacks belief in a god or gods existence, because no evidence has been presented to date, that supports the claim that one does.

 

Does not matter if there is evidence or not, an atheist is someone who believes in God's nonexistence.

 

nope. an atheist lacks belief in a god or gods existence, because no evidence has been presented to date, that supports the claim that one does.

 

So then you deny that an atheist is someone who believes in G/gods nonexistence? Explain.

 

And yet you hid your source, maybe you should ask yourself why?
Maybe you like to pretend to yourself it is you that is actually coming up with arguments rather than just copy and paste anything you think agrees with you.

 

No true agnostic would presume to know what another believes, yet you desperately cling to the comfort blanket that an atheist must believe there are no gods. It is clear that you cannot conceive of a world without gods, where the entire concept is so meaningless and pointless that it is not worth forming a belief on.

 

Your petty and ignorant focus on pointless symantics is both annoying and pathetic. You have one trick little pony and it sucks, making you seem not just a fool but a moron as well. At this point your replies are predictable and so full of excrement I can smell them before you even defecate them.
I will probably get dinged for stating the truth everyone here thinks but, someone needs to do it and I'll take the hit.

 

an atheist lacks belief in a god or gods existence, because no evidence has been presented to date, that supports the claim that one does.

 

Citation please

 

we leave that to the lackers, to tell theists and agnostics about their beliefs in sky pilot and spaghetti monsters. What a bunch of hypocrites huh?

Oh? So you do deny that atheists believe in G/gods nonexistence after all. They are really theists I suppose.

 

More fantasy from you. After all, it is all you have.

 

nice example of irrational incredulity

 

It is clear you are not bright enough to grasp what the FSM and Sky Fairies are so I will attempt an explanation even your tiny little mind might be capable of understanding:

The IS NO Fling Spaghetti Monster nor are there Sky Fairies. Both are sarcastic representations of the idiocy of people like you saying your God is real. That this needs to be pointed out to you, sadly displays the level of intellect you possess.

By the way....does your invented "Lacker" thingy mean someone who lacks belief in God? If so your own silly made up term defeats your symantics stupidity.

 

And there you go proving yourself wrong again by insisting you know what atheists believe! Again we see what happens when you try to have an original thought as opposed to plagiarising someone elses.

 

What do you know about credibility when time and time again, people have shown your plagiarism.

You never bothered to even argue, you knew your plagiarism had been proven again.

 

well well now, that pendulum swings both ways! If lackers lacking belief is symantics then why are they playing word games? Why dont they just say they believe in Gods nonexistence in the first place instead of playing ssemantics?

Sure so you have 'evidence' they do not exist since you know they were made up sarcasm, but in the case of God, you have no evidence, yet you faithfully believe in Gods nonexistence.