I agree, the total Russian collusion sham should be stopped and let's get on with governance. we all understand at this point that the media, dnc, fbi, state dept and other exec staff used a fake bit of Intel, puppet tech company, unaffiliated charges and constant hit pieces to start a ludicrous charge against this admin of colluding with the Russians. some idiot leaked emails and podesta tried to launder money for an African Prince and next thing you know, thousands of sheep think Putin's cyber army put trump in the white house. additionally, any measure trump uses to avoid all out cold war II with Russia is reported as payback, lol. if folks have the mental capacity to step back out of the bubble and see this entire thing unfold objectively, it really shines a terrible light on how manipulative our gov/ complicit media system can be and how prone to manipulation our dimwitted populace has become.
Refute? I'm establishing ... USNA grad Carter Page, did in fact bring down a Russian spy ring in 2013. Liberals may try to impugn him for his Moscow speech, and alleged "conact" with Russian energy officials ... But these are the same liberals who defend Clintons trip to Kazakhistan, and his $500K speech. FBI informant Doug Campbell however, just testified, and he paints a very different picture. Page, is charged with nothing. Page, won't allow himself to be smeared either.
You have zero empirical evidence that Carter Page was responsible for the 2013 Russian spy ring being brought to justice. You also failed to address where he obtained the funds to start his investment firm. Page is not what the alt right wants him to be,
Right ... your leftist comradess have been denying, for 2 days, that Page wasn't the FBI's inside man. Better keep up ... while leftists are trying to smear Page over a 30K speech, and alleged "conact" with Russian Gazprom officials, Campbell, the FBI's Uranium 1 mole just fingered the Clintons. Bribery and Russian money laundering through CGI.
You've been provided far more evidence than you've offered ... Never mind where Carter got his money, let's talk about where you get yours ... See, I want to know, and therefore I have a right to know, and you're obligated to tell me. If you refuse I'll publicly accuse you of crimes I'm sure you've committed. Which do you prefer I allege ... ISIS or N. Korean propagandist?
Your entire post has zero to do with the thread topic so I guess you are side stepping again. Carry on......
http://www.politicalforum.com/index...1-informant-makes-clinton-allegations.525729/ You're right. Care to take up the discussion in it's proper forum? It's Muellers time!
^^^This is the definition of thread spamming, jestsayin', ^^^^ but that level of "grasping for straws" reminds me of this:
That is not a crime And Page has never been accused of any crime either before or after the investigation
From your meme I can only gather that you accept Clintons collusion, and money laundering is self apparent, common knowledge, something everyone has known from the start. Agreed.
We dont have to prove his innocence to the accusers They have to prove Page’s guilt So ask them where he got the funds
Check the link he's calling "spam" ... His idol Bob Mueller missed that bit of Russian collusion, or looked the other way on it. Mueller is the source of all the FBI's woes. As director he made abuses of authority routine.
Money laundering is a crime. Where did Page find the money he used to start his investment firm right after he returned from Moscow? That question is certainly going to one that the SC investigation is going to ask. Be interesting to learn what they are discovering about the flaky Carter Page.
Actually, I am in agreement with you on all of the ideas you enumerated, except for the one about Medicare. Medicare is, IMHO, an earned entitlement, properly reserved for those who have become 'senior citizens', which they deserve primarily because of having been forced by the government to pay into the Medicare system throughout their working lives. But, I do favor a 'single-payer' system for a national healthcare system (even though my fellow Conservatives are generally horrified that I could advocate such a thing). Single-payer could work surprisingly well, providing the best coverage, with the smallest premiums, smallest numbers of co-pays, deductions and exclusions, cover all plan-participants throughout the U. S., and produce successful patient outcomes equal to, or greater than the current ratios. We can take this up in another thread if you like. You'd be surprised to hear that I actually liked ol' honest Bernie quite a lot! True, his brand of 'Socialism-lite' was a bit too much for most people to embrace, but I can see how, with some modification, it could be 'morphed' into a German-style Socialism, which is, IMHO, the most beneficial, viable form of Socialism in the world today. And, honestly, my sense is that Bernie was the most honest candidate to make the last cut. Maybe it's enough for me to say that in a contest between Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton, I'd vote for Bernie without hesitation! Oh, I'd still prefer Rick Perry to anyone else I can think of, but, that's 'water under the bridge'. Back to this thread's topic... I see that new we're going to get into square-miles of 'memos', counter-memos, definition-memos, clarification-memos, rebuttal-memos, counter-rebuttal-memos, etc. Gag! Someone is going to have to sort through all this crap and find the thread(s) of truth, painful though that might be. But, who's going to do it? The same people who have been identified and/or implicated as participating in this labyrinthine affair? Anybody's "Alexander" who tries to cut through this "Gordian Knot" is immediately going to be attacked as being in league with 'the other side', no matter who he is. So, what's the 'answer'...? I suppose that if I were President Trump I would issue an Executive Order demanding that all of the information, both 'Republican' and 'Democrat' alike, is brought forth and made available to everyone in the 'pure light of day'. There's no reason to hold anything back on the basis of 'national security' at this point. Consider: if the arch-Bugaboo in this whole thing are 'the Russians', then we can find relief by acknowledging that if 'the Russians' really were trying to "hack the election for Trump", they were stupid and inept enough to have botched the job so badly that they must have intended for us to discover it. Now, at this point, in sifting through all this crap, why would we fear that 'the Russians' would find any intelligence 'bread crumbs' under the table of American politics that they hadn't already studied to death long before now...? No, let's have all the information out in the open, and then let the chips fall where they may. But let's make certain that those chips fall in a vacuum -- without any 'room fans' blowing the chips one way or the other....
Nunes demonstrated that his memo was totally hollow. You need to find a basis for what you're posting. It certainly doesn't come from Nunes.