“Black People Unite!” After Proposal by Black Racist – South Africa Votes to Confiscate Land from Wh

I've only been to South Africa once and that was for two weeks back in the late 1970's when South Africa was still great.

The large cities like Johannesburg were no different from America's cities except less crime back in the day.
The people were extremely friendly but the Affrikaanans seemed to be alpha male bigly.
Beautiful country. Beautiful people including their women.

Back when South Africa was great, before the ANC, South Africa was an industrialized nation and the most powerful nation on the African continent. It even had it's own military industrial complex and the most powerful and best trained and equipped military on the continent of Africa.

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/07430178808405326?journalCode=cdan19

Blast from the past
During the seventies and eighties South Africa built many world-class military weapons, including the Cheetah fighter and nuclear weapons

https://mybroadband.co.za/news/gadgets/124533-awesome-weapons-made-in-south-africa.html

 

~~~~
The plane in the image was the English Electric Canberra, or USAF Martin B-57 medium Bomber. A very versatile plane. So much so it was used prior to the U-2 for high altitude photographic reconnaissance using modified wings and renamed the RB-57. The first time I saw the plane was in Incirlik AFB,Turkey.
The surrender of South Africa to the terrorist ANC sounded the death knell for the white Afrikaners in South Africa. If the government turns over all the Afrikaner farms to blacks, South Africa will become another starving country within 4 years. Needless to say the white population in S.A., will face a genocide not seen since the Holocaust by the Nazi's.

​

 

There were some USAF B-57 bombers based at the DaNang air base when I was there.


DaNang 1970

 

~~~~
I was long gone by then by over a year.

 

Welcome home Wehrwolfen.

 

Why even bring this up since it's none of our business what the black Africans do to their white farmers???

The only reason to bring it up is to compare it to what might happen in the future with the black population in the USA and the west???

I'm under the impression that the new wave of black rights in the USA is dependent upon white people giving up their lands and fortune to black people. At least that's what I heard from some Black Lives Matter people.

And women's rights is now about black women and white women need to get to the back of the crowd in marches and stuff because they benefited from Women's rights movement and minority women didn't.

 

Their white farmers? So they own them?

I would imagine they will take care of those white farmers soon enough. The african way.

 

Yup, once the "kill the white farmers" party runs the country it's their white farmers.

 

~~~~
That's after we pay reparations to them. Maybe have another Obama Pigford Scandal payout? I wonder when Democrats will begin accusing Republicans of Apartheid violations to start the ball rolling?

 

~~~~
Really I was shipped out of Nam in the mid-60's. Thanks anyway.

 

In-country June 69 - July 70.

First six months in-country
NGF Plt. HQ 1/13 usually TAD to 1/26 and 2/26

Last half of my tour
Sub Unit One 1st ANGLICO

 

I bet the white people of S. Africa are really glad they listened to Western white liberals, huh?

 

It's a cruel world. What can I do to bring peace to S.Africa? Nothing. Even if I was a president or a king I wouldn't start the war or impose sanctions (which are really useless and will only worsen the situation) on S.Africa demanding to better relations between the citizens. The USSR made a mistake while supporting the fight on the side of... 'the blacks' (It might sound incorrect politically, but I really forgot if it was NSA or some other group).
I personally worked with a guy from S.Africa. He is a white racist. He is of different faith (much more religious). But he was a good person and I will really try to find any opportunities for him and his kids if only I have a chance... What else can I do? Demand to kill all those who want to kill the people? It doesn't make sense, does it? It's logically a suicide idea.

 

Where have we heard that line before?
put this way: "A land without a people for a people without a land"

So here's a couple of lines 4U
"Those who can make you believe Absurdities can make you commit Atrocities ” -
................................................................................................................................................. Voltaire
&
" id quot circumiret, circumveniat"


+ a little bit of History
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page

From The Article:
The first humans are believed to have inhabited South Africa more than 100,000 years ago.
The historical record of this ethnically diverse country is generally divided into five distinct periods:
the pre-colonial era, the colonial era, the post-colonial and apartheid eras, and the post-apartheid era.
Much of this history, particularly of the colonial and post-colonial eras, is characterized by clashes
of culture, violent territorial disputes between European settlers and indigenous people, dispossession
and repression, and other racial and political tensions.

 

Again, why should Bantu now make claims when they arrived after the Europeans in South Africa?

I have no problems with the 25.000 Khoisan people making claims.

 

Putting aside the factless and erroneous race baiting in the OP the parliamentary vote was meaningless since property rights are protected under the South African Constitution.

http://politicalforum.com/index.php...es-with-israel.527084/page-10#post-1068754395

Per your link the vote passed with only 241 supporters, Amendments to the SA Constitution requires a 2/3rds vote which would be 267 votes out of 400. It would also need to be ratified by 6 of the 9 provinces AKA states.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitution_of_South_Africa#Amendments

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitution_of_South_Africa#Chapter_1:_Founding_Provisions

 

From your own link;

 

You have not substantiated your utterly bogus allegation.

 

Between the 13th and 15th centuries, the relatively powerful Bantu-speaking states on a scale larger than local chiefdoms began to emerge, in the Great Lakes region, in the savanna south of the Central African rainforest, and on the Zambezi river where the Monomatapakings built the famous Great Zimbabwe complex. Such processes of state-formation occurred with increasing frequency from the 16th century onward. They were probably due to denser population, which led to more specialised divisions of labour, including military power, while making outmigration more difficult. Other factors were increased trade among African communities and with European, and Arab traders on the coasts; technological developments in economic activity, and new techniques in the political-spiritual ritualisation of royalty as the source of national strength and health.[31]

Rise of the Zulu Empire (18th–19th centuries)Edit
By the time Great Zimbabwe had ceased being the capital of a large trading empire, speakers of Bantu languages were present throughout much of southern Africa. Two main groups developed: the Nguni (Xhosa, Zulu, Swazi) who occupied the eastern coastal plains and the Sotho–Tswana who lived on the interior plateau.

In the late 18th and early 19th century, two major events occurred. The Trekboers were colonizing new areas of southern Africa, moving northeast from the Cape Colony, and they came into contact with the Xhosa, the Southern Nguni. At the same time major events were taking place further north in modern-day KwaZulu-Natal. At that time the area was populated by dozens of small clans, one of which was the Zulu, then a particularly small clan of no local distinction whatsoever. In 1816 Shaka acceded to the Zulu throne. Within a year he had conquered the neighboring clans, and had made the Zulu into the most important ally of the large Mtetwa clan, which was in competition with the Ndwandwe clan for domination of the northern part of modern-day KwaZulu-Natal.


The dutch settled there from 1602

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boer

The bantu came 200 years later. Before that SA was only settled by khoisan and xhosa hunterers and gatherers.

So what now? Bantu can make claims because they are black? Or are all blacks same for you?

 

Your source is not credible since it does NOT include the PREHISTORY of South Africa.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_South_Africa

Blacks were inhabiting ALL of the South Africa long before the white settlers arrived.

 

Ok, so all negroes are same for you. Good too know.

Im glad we agree regarding that. Im member 7n the far right AfD party in Germany and i see it as you do, africans belong to africa. There are some leftists here who say we cant deport a eritean to uganda. But i see it as you, black is black. Africa is africa.

 

Then why did you post this utterly bogus allegation?

Furthermore it no longer matters who was there first. The South African Constitution, which was a COMPROMISE to avoid a bloody civil war, ensured that there must be COMPENSATION for property seized by the government from individuals. The courts will invalidate any bills passed in their Parliament WITHOUT the necessary majority to amend the Constitution. Unlike a great many other African nations South Africa has a respected justice system.

 

South Africa is a shithole like evry other african country.

 

Asinine not sequitur that does not address the question that was asked regarding your bogus allegation.