Nunes Aide Is Leaking the Ukraine Whistleblower’s Name, Sources Say

Are you sure about it? Shameful.

Obama’s war on whistleblowers leaves administration insiders unscathed

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.th...standard-obama-david-petraeus-chelsea-manning

 

Why would one deep state member blow the whistle on another deep state member? But when Devin Nunes blew the whistle on the spying of the Trump Campaign Nancy Pelosi didn't even want that information released, saying it would be a 'Constitutional Crisis'.

She knew it must have meant a crisis for the democrats.

 

That's the Democrats MO why would they go after him?

 

That was different..

That is whataboutism..

Yer racist cause Obama was part black!!!! ( note to mods that is sarcasm k thanks)

 

Those who leaked to him are not protected under federal law. If he then leaked classified information to someone else that may not be protected.

 

"The official added that it soon became clear among NSC staff that Ciaramella opposed the new Republican president’s foreign policies. “My recollection of Eric is that he was very smart and very passionate, particularly about Ukraine and Russia. That was his thing – Ukraine,” he said. “He didn’t exactly hide his passion with respect to what he thought was the right thing to do with Ukraine and Russia, and his views were at odds with the president’s policies.”"

Ahhhhh he was nit elected to be in charge if foreign policy. The PRESIDENT dictates foreign policy if he didn't like then he should have resigned. Hopefully there WILL BE some federal charges if if actively worked to undermine the foreign policy OF THE UNITED STATES.

 

Why ? Leaky faucets stink.Stale potato chips ... stink.
Watered down bar whisky stinks.
Most all Democrats stink.
So why on earth and in the confessional would leaking the name of
someone be such a big deal.I mean,that was the case of the average mindset of
a Hitler Storm Trooper and even more so with a Third Reich Gestapo.
Plus a Whistleblower has to be someone Blowing the whistle with FIRSTHAND
Info on something related to an illicit activity that is usually being hidden.
If someone leaked the fact that Donald Trump liked having the White House
staff prepare him late night cheeseburgers { more than one } than that is
not Whistleblowing.Now If Trump like having a certain new White House staff {galsy}
personally bring him that cheeseburger on a nice WH china dish while showing off
an identical replica { see thru negligee } that Melania also prefers than that
could be deemed a proper whistleblowing.Depending on how mush blowing
{ Not gum popping } takes place.

 

Did you read the 'article' ? You will need another source.

 

Please provide a credible link or don't bother.

 

Behghazi was an oversight hearing of the State Department on the death of an ambassador not an impeachment and only behind closed doors when they involved methods and means that were classified. Schiff has gagged the Republicans and not allowed them to call witnesesses nor allowed White House counsel.

 

You missed the point. Just imagine that Trump's administration dealt with the whistleblowers the same way Obama"s administration dealt. I am just exposing the U.S liberal media hypocrisy. It stinks to high heaven. And don"t pretend that Trump calling whistleblowers names is somehow worse than jailing them like Obama did.

 

The point is you have not established how Obama 'handled' whistleblowers. Unless you find an unbiased source than that pile of excrement you won't be exposing anything or anyone. Find a credible source of someone who used the whistleblower statute properly as it was designed and prove that Obama called them a traitor or did worse?

 

Every committee session begins by Schiff explaining that nothing is classified.

 

The identity of the whistleblower IS protected by federal law. Especially if that person works in the intel community

The fact that the right is so focused on the whistleblower and not what he/she said is very telling

 

If you don't the history of the topic why involve yourself in the conversation? Have you ever heard of the "Nunes Memo".

Maybe this will help, if the subject interests you. https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4365338-Nunes-memo.html

 

Great! What did the whistleblower say?

 

That holds true for every Schiff meeting.

 

Aren't you interested in discovering who's conspiring to push this hoax?

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/cont...elensky/4b9e0ca5-3824-467f-b1a3-77f2d4ee16aa/

 

We all know who that is. Pelosi, Schiff and Nadler with the deep state backing them up. The whistleblower - Eric Ciaramella - no longer has any role in it. He was just tool to get the ball rolling.

 

What "conspiracy" are you referring to ?

The big accusation in the Whistleblower complaint was the call the president had with the Ukraine, and when the president released his memo of the call, it pretty mush was exactly what the whistleblower said

 

Maybe because this Obama Lovefest of the MSM during his Reign
was not reporting his { Obama's } Negatives.Obama targeted " Whistleblowers "
during his Reign with The Most ever use of - The Espionage Act -.
Obama used the - Espionage Act - more than all Presidents COMBINED.

 

We don't Know WHAT the " Whistleblower " said nor who he is.
But the scuttlebutt around D.C. is that most Pols know who the guy is.
He worked briefly in the Trump White House { looking for ways to spy
on it }.This Guy age 33 also worked in the Obama WH. Worked with
Biden,Susan Rice and John Brennan.I believe he worked in the NSC.
Graduated Yale and was very troubled over Ukraine anything.
Spoke fluent Russian/Ukrainian.
Was specifically Anti-Trump policy on Foreign Affairs.

 

How did the whistleblower get this classified information? Two other phone calls with the leaders of Australia and Mexico were also leaked. Should this whistleblower be tried for treason?

 

He's not a Whistler-blower, he's a gossip.

• Over the past four months, more than half a dozen U.S. officials have informed me of various facts related to this effort. The information provided herein was relayed to me in the course of official interagency business. It is routine for U.S. officials with responsibility for a particular regional or functional portfolio to share such information with one another in order to inform policymaking and analysis.

• I was not a direct witness to most of the events described. However, I found my colleagues' accounts of these events to be credible because, in almost all cases, multiple officials recounted fact patterns that were consistent with one another. In addition, a variety of information consistent with these private accounts has been reported publicly.