Nunes Aide Is Leaking the Ukraine Whistleblower’s Name, Sources Say

Discussion in 'United States' started by MrTLegal, Oct 29, 2019.

  1. Fred C Dobbs

    Fred C Dobbs Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 12, 2016
    Messages:
    19,496
    Likes Received:
    9,006
    Trophy Points:
    113
    They weren't 'his' complaints. It seems they were complaints from his colleagues around the water cooler.
     
    Ddyad likes this.
  2. Thought Criminal

    Thought Criminal Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2017
    Messages:
    18,135
    Likes Received:
    13,224
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yes, "pretty much"; only without the coloration of the so-called whistleblower's opinion.
     
    Last edited: Oct 31, 2019
    Fred C Dobbs and Ddyad like this.
  3. Fred C Dobbs

    Fred C Dobbs Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 12, 2016
    Messages:
    19,496
    Likes Received:
    9,006
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Obama had the FBI on the media as well. They certainly did his bidding.
     
    Ddyad likes this.
  4. struth

    struth Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2018
    Messages:
    33,519
    Likes Received:
    17,956
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Odd that it's done behind close doors
     
    Ddyad and Dutch like this.
  5. LogNDog

    LogNDog Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2015
    Messages:
    5,380
    Likes Received:
    6,546
    Trophy Points:
    113
    What law states that a whistleblower is guaranteed anonymity? Include link please.
     
    Last edited: Oct 31, 2019
    Ddyad likes this.
  6. Dutch

    Dutch Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2010
    Messages:
    46,383
    Likes Received:
    15,488
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    :roflol:
     
  7. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    154,939
    Likes Received:
    39,414
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    No it's not. And we have a right to know what were his motivations and who were his accomplices.
     
    LogNDog, Ddyad and Fred C Dobbs like this.
  8. Egoboy

    Egoboy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2017
    Messages:
    44,763
    Likes Received:
    32,099
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    His motivations were "credible" and "urgent"

    The people that gave him the information will have to be gotten from them, not him...

    I expect Vindman is one of them though, if that makes you feel better..
     
  9. Fred C Dobbs

    Fred C Dobbs Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 12, 2016
    Messages:
    19,496
    Likes Received:
    9,006
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Why were they "urgent"?
     
    Ddyad likes this.
  10. grapeape

    grapeape Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2015
    Messages:
    17,308
    Likes Received:
    9,638
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So what your saying is all "hear-say"

    And NONE of that matters if the accusations are vetted. And that is happening right now.
     
  11. grapeape

    grapeape Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2015
    Messages:
    17,308
    Likes Received:
    9,638
    Trophy Points:
    113
    All due respect Fred, but why does that matter ? Are the core accusations true ?

    You have someone who is hearing everyone say "this guys doing illegal things", and none of them are reporting it (for reasons unknown), so he reports it.

    The IG does a cursory investigations, finds the accusations credible, so they move to the next step which is full investigation.
     
    bx4 likes this.
  12. grapeape

    grapeape Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2015
    Messages:
    17,308
    Likes Received:
    9,638
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Does the whisltblower have the clearance ? If not, who gave it to him ? Were those he "heard talking" the ones breaking the law ?

    Remember that the whistleblower followed the rules and the law in the way they filed the complaint.

    But why is the defense of the right to attack the messenger, and not the message ?
     
  13. Egoboy

    Egoboy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2017
    Messages:
    44,763
    Likes Received:
    32,099
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    It's probably either because Ukraine hadn't gotten their aid yet (urgent to Ukraine) or because the president was jeopardizing National Security by withholding the aid (urgent to US)...
     
    bx4 likes this.
  14. grapeape

    grapeape Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2015
    Messages:
    17,308
    Likes Received:
    9,638
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Either way, what he said was correct. Right ?
     
    Egoboy and bx4 like this.
  15. grapeape

    grapeape Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2015
    Messages:
    17,308
    Likes Received:
    9,638
    Trophy Points:
    113
    And that will come out in the full investigation whether that is correct of not.

    But what the president released, pretty much corroborated what was in the complaint.
     
    bx4 likes this.
  16. grapeape

    grapeape Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2015
    Messages:
    17,308
    Likes Received:
    9,638
    Trophy Points:
    113
    https://fas.org/sgp/crs/intel/R45345.pdf

     
  17. grapeape

    grapeape Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2015
    Messages:
    17,308
    Likes Received:
    9,638
    Trophy Points:
    113
    your wrong yet again

    Motives have no bearing on evidence
     
    bx4 likes this.
  18. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    154,939
    Likes Received:
    39,414
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    So what although you misinterpret what that means and who makes the final decision on the matter. People were leaking classified information to this guy and he went outside the bounds and colluded with political parties to try and remove a President with whom he disagreed on foreign policy. Who elected this guy to determine foreign policy and where does the Constitution say that a subordinate disagreeing on foreign policy is grounds for removal?
     
    Ddyad and Thought Criminal like this.
  19. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    154,939
    Likes Received:
    39,414
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I am perfectly correct again his motives to engage in his little scheme bear directly upon it and we the People have a right to know who all were involved in it.
     
    Ddyad likes this.
  20. Egoboy

    Egoboy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2017
    Messages:
    44,763
    Likes Received:
    32,099
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Wow... let's talk misinterpreting things someday...

    P.S. Congrats for getting to 100K posts...
     
    Last edited: Oct 31, 2019
  21. RodB

    RodB Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2015
    Messages:
    22,576
    Likes Received:
    11,231
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I'm curious: is there anything wrong with leaking the whistle blower's name?
     
    Ddyad likes this.
  22. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    154,939
    Likes Received:
    39,414
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    LogNDog and Ddyad like this.
  23. Egoboy

    Egoboy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2017
    Messages:
    44,763
    Likes Received:
    32,099
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I'm not: Yes
     
  24. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    154,939
    Likes Received:
    39,414
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Sure but in the meantime

    People were leaking classified information to this guy and he went outside the bounds and colluded with political parties to try and remove a President with whom he disagreed on foreign policy. Who elected this guy to determine foreign policy and where does the Constitution say that a subordinate disagreeing on foreign policy is grounds for removal?
     
  25. Fred C Dobbs

    Fred C Dobbs Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 12, 2016
    Messages:
    19,496
    Likes Received:
    9,006
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The aid was released and the Ukrainians have it so there was obviously no "Quid pro quo".

    How was US security being jeopardized?
     
    Ddyad likes this.

Share This Page