Nunes Aide Is Leaking the Ukraine Whistleblower’s Name, Sources Say

So you have nothing. As suspected.

I think I remember that from the schoolyard. "If you don't know I'm not going to tell you". Is that where you got it?

 

He didn’t. He just asked for a quid pro quo which Ukraine was too smart to give him. And once the Trump crap became public miraculously the aid was suddenly released. The power of the fake media exposing the corruption of the Trump administration.

 

No wanting people to spoon feed them information that they should have learned from paying attention to the testimonies is just a pathetic dodge. Standard technique of those who need to deny facts.

 

which transcript. Are you referring to the memo of Trump’s phone conversation that was clearly labeled as a memo for those not too damn lazy to actually read it.

 

Are you referring to the facts leaked from the closed door inquiry or do you have some alternatives?

 

The conversation between Trump and Zelensky was called a transcript but if you want to call it a memo that's fine with me. Or do have information from a different memo/transcript on the same subject?

 

So he didn't receive any favors and yet the military aid was released. Does that not weaken the case of a quid pro quo?

Do you know when that aid was 'suddenly and miraculously released'?

If Joe Biden acted illegally, or if the US government worked in conjunction with the Ukrainian government to work against an actual presidential candidate, not a pretend one like Joe Biden, would you want to know about it?

 

"The fact is absolutely undeniable that Trump solicited a foreign powers interference in our national politics and that he withheld military aid to Ukraine in an attempt to pressure them to lie about investigating Biden." = not fact.

 

You've heard the testimonies?

Then you must know that the rest of us are unable to.

 

Behghazi was an oversight hearing of the State Department on the attack of. State Department ancillary and death of an ambassador not an impeachment. I don't know why you would think the House intelligence and foreign affairs would not investigate on a matter of oversight such an event.
To compare that to this baseless impeach is absurd.

 

You sure? Everything Comrade Schitt has done so far has been in secret. If his show gets to the "Upper House" Senate it will likely be a quick vote to dismiss his illegitimate madness.

 

Oh yes, I am sure that you will see much more of Schiff and the rest of the members of House Intelligence Committee, doing public questioning, over the next several weeks.

 

When Schiff and Nadler fall on their face, they will be sacrificed.

 

I can hardly wait, especially if Schiff for Brains censors any witnesses, subpoenas or questions. The public will be able to see what a 3 ring circus it really is.

 

You know darn well it was a failing of our State Department and a prime issue for oversight by the Congress ate YOU REALLY trying to say Congress had no oversight there? How absurd.

When theybfome under executive privilege but the fact is the transcript was released there is nothing further to investigate

We already know nothing came of the closed door hearings.

 

The complaintant files through proper channels the IG whobmakes the "urgent" determination NOT the filer, then it goes to the OLC who in this case determined no laws were violated and it didn't meet whistleblower standing. The fact is it was a scheme by the Democrats who tried to hide there role in it.

 

Yeah, the iPad actually autocorrects when you hit send. It’s really bad, my apologies

You don't have to accept any “interpretation” at this point. There is no interpretation needed. The President released his “call memo” and it very much said exactly what he whistleblower said, which was that the president asked a foreign nation to investigate his main political rival. Not sure how you can see that any other way.

 

Who’s “fooling” anyone? The President released his “call memo” and he admitted he said exactly what the whistleblower said.Why is that so hard for the right to understand ?

 

Wait, you mean the that Barr (a political appointee) says that it didn’t meet the “standard”.

FFS, you cannot be serious ?

Read the LAW !!!! The DNI, whom this opinions is referring to, has no legal right to hold the complaint no matter what. Thats very clear in the law. The complaint going thru the DNI is nothing but legal formality. The DNI cannot hold the complaint because the DNI is a political appointee.

So you think that Barrs OLC should have the right to claim this “not urgent”, AFTER the IG says it is ?

I’m sure you would have the same opinion had Loretta Lynch done this for Bill or Hillary

 

And that will be when the incompetence and lies really become exposed to the American people. Adam Schiff being torn apart on the witness stand will make for riveting television.

 

How did the whistleblower get his information? That's definitely a question that will be asked. Everyone knows who it is but if Adam Schiff doesn't say his name on the witness stand he could be held as an accomplice.

 

Do you feel that Donald Trump is Joe Biden's main political rival?

 

If Biden is involved in corruption that needs investigated, that's a him problem

 

I thought Biden was running against fellow democrats for the nomination of a private corporation, the DNC.

 

The OFFICE OF LEGAL COUNSEL, having trouble reading? The IG doesn't make that legal determination.

So why did the complainer go around that and instead go and collude with partisan politicians to cook up the little scheme which was then lied about.