only for those who cant read or are taking a cruise up de' nile Court: In the light of the decision of the court of appeals in Kaufman, 419 F.3d at 682, the Wisconsin Department of Corrections is revising its policy regarding religious practices and property to reflect that atheism is a religion. seems the court disagrees with you.
no, for everyone who understand constitutional law, and supreme court rulings vs dicta. That excludes you. It does not matter how many times you cite that same ruling, it still does not rule atheism to be a religion. It ruled atheists have 1st amendment protections. Reality remains, no court, at any time, has ever ruled atheism to be a religion.
only for those who cant read or are taking a cruise up de' nile scrotus never ruled atheism is not a religion, the 7th circuit court of appeals ruled it is a religion, the district court applied the appeals court ruling as seen below. suck it up buttercup Court: In the light of the decision of the court of appeals in Kaufman, 419 F.3d at 682, the Wisconsin Department of Corrections is revising its policy regarding religious practices and property to reflect that atheism is a religion. seems the court disagrees with you.
no, for everyone who understand constitutional law, and supreme court rulings vs dicta. That excludes you. [/QUOTE]scrotus never ruled atheism is not a religion, the 7th circuit court of appeals ruled it is a religion, the district court applied the appeals court ruling as seen below. suck it up buttercup Court: In the light of the decision of the court of appeals in Kaufman, 419 F.3d at 682, the Wisconsin Department of Corrections is revising its policy regarding religious practices and property to reflect that atheism is a religion. seems the court disagrees with you.[/QUOTE] It does not matter how many times you cite that same ruling, it still does not rule atheism to be a religion. It ruled atheists have 1st amendment protections. Reality remains, no court, at any time, has ever ruled atheism to be a religion.
Yes everyone knows, you are 'very' selective about the reality you accept! Judges do not impose government policy changes based upon dicta. nice fail 1) scrotus never ruled atheism is not a religion, 2) the 7th circuit court of appeals ruled it is a religion, 3) the district court applied the appeals court ruling as seen below. Thats 3 strikes your otta here! suck it up buttercup Court: In the light of the decision of the court of appeals in Kaufman, 419 F.3d at 682, the Wisconsin Department of Corrections is revising its policy regarding religious practices and property to reflect that atheism is a religion. seems the court disagrees with you.
1) false 2) false No matter how many times you want to post those lies the facts are: Judges do not impose government policy changes based upon dicta. nice fail 1) a scrotus ruling is required to overturn the court of appeals, none exist 2) scrotus never ruled atheism is not a religion, 3) the 7th circuit court of appeals ruled atheism is a religion, 4) the district court applied the appeals court ruling that atheim is a religion as seen below. Thats 3 strikes your otta here! suck it up buttercup Court: In the light of the decision of the court of appeals in Kaufman, 419 F.3d at 682, the Wisconsin Department of Corrections is revising its policy regarding religious practices and property to reflect that atheism is a religion. Your 'now proven' uneducated legal opinions do not trump the court, the court disagrees with you and ruled atheism is a religion.
I can do this as long as you can pal! Who do you think is going to believe your TOTALLY UNSUPPORTED OPINIONS OVER THE COURT? 1) false 2) false No matter how many times you want to post those lies the facts are: Judges do not impose government policy changes based upon dicta. nice fail 1) a scrotus ruling is required to overturn the court of appeals, none exist 2) scrotus never ruled atheism is not a religion, 3) the 7th circuit court of appeals ruled atheism is a religion, 4) the district court applied the appeals court ruling that atheim is a religion as seen below. Thats 3 strikes your otta here! suck it up buttercup Court: In the light of the decision of the court of appeals in Kaufman, 419 F.3d at 682, the Wisconsin Department of Corrections is revising its policy regarding religious practices and property to reflect that atheism is a religion. Your 'now proven' uneducated legal opinions do not trump the court, the court disagrees with you and ruled atheism is a religion.
I can do this as long as you can pal! Who do you think is going to believe your TOTALLY UNSUPPORTED OPINIONS OVER THE COURT? 1) false 2) false No matter how many times you want to post those lies the facts are: Judges do not impose government policy changes based upon dicta. nice fail 1) a scrotus ruling is required to overturn the court of appeals, none exist 2) scrotus never ruled atheism is not a religion, 3) the 7th circuit court of appeals ruled atheism is a religion, 4) the district court applied the appeals court ruling that atheim is a religion as seen below. Thats 3 strikes your otta here! suck it up buttercup Court: In the light of the decision of the court of appeals in Kaufman, 419 F.3d at 682, the Wisconsin Department of Corrections is revising its policy regarding religious practices and property to reflect that atheism is a religion. Your 'now proven' uneducated legal opinions do not trump the court, the court disagrees with you and ruled atheism is a religion.
Im covinced those posts and tactics are nothing more than spamming the board with spam that falls beneath the radar of moderation. You are spot on there have been several 'atheists' that have proven the foolishness he posts is really fvcked up logic. Citing credible universities, philosophical abstracts, theological abstracts, judges, appeals courts decisions wont even be considered, absolutely nothing gets through. Worse the moment you prove it for what it is, bullshit, you will be accused of trolling. says it all. You like the rest of us , will find out that you cannot reason with unreason. For some people these dupposed debates are not about getting to the core of an issue, they are purely proselytizing a political agenda, no matter how ridiculous it looks to the rest of us out here, where everything from strawmen to ridiculously obvious lies are all on the table and fair game if it pushes the party line. On the other hand it demonstrates perfectly how over the top out to lunch the neoatheists atheology really is.
I just showed proof it is. It has nothing to do with lack of belief it is what they believe. Do you believe there is a God?
No they don’t. Atheism means the same thing today as it always has. Lack of belief in a god or gods. Sorry.
I prayed and I heard that the Corona virus extravaganza was taken way over the top. Maybe like unfigured out (fake news)... shhh Does President Kim Jong Un really have a 'body' - double? But with different features? huh? I thought shape shifting was for mythological purposes. A person once said the ouija board mouse moved on its own. Harry Houdini once said he got out of a secured straight jacket on his own. Magic!!
