I told you several times you really dont understand how to read a dictionary, that your usage of 'by definition' among other things is totally wrong, you unwittingly prove me correct with your inability to realize that you did in fact say "atheists believe in gods".
except you are fully aware that you are wrong, and that what I keep posting is correct. And you are simply trolling. And intentionally lying about what I said, as everyone reading can see nowhere in the quotes you provided did I say what you claimed.
Im not the one lying here. you said atheists "don’t believe there is no god." that they are theists. It was a direct quote.
and what you claimed I said, vs what you quoted me saying was a complete fabrication, that you are fully aware of.
Reely? What makes you think that? It is crystal clear. From my pov it would only take someone with as little as 3rd grade reading skills to correctly understand that what you said means atheists believe in god. It is what you said, I directly quoted you, so you cant pretend you didnt say it
Back then when the Earth was flooded the whole human population consisted of the sons of Cain and the sons of Adam, more or less. 2 branches of family, more and/or less.
Also, it would have slaughtered the animals, too,with some representatives living in the ark. After that, the water all went somewhere and a HUGE population of animal species sprang up.
the rest of your post was irrelevant. You quoted me, directly, and then you lied about what I said, even though what I said was directly quoted above what you lied about me saying.
To say that I lied is posting lies, in fact another atheist humorously pointed out that I caught what you said. (its always humorous when someone shoots themselves in the foot) Thats ok it only proves you do not understand how language functions which is what everyone has been trying to tell you in very nice ways, but you simply remain obtuse and continue to reject reality.
He's never managed to muster any kind of consistency on this point. His position changes with the wind. He claims to be an agnostic, but he can't tolerate an agnostic.
you quoted me saying something. You then claimed further down in that post that I said something different than what was quoted above. That is an intentional lie.
not true. but your insistence that I did just adds more nails to the coffin, Im running out of room to pound them in.