He did not define all the variables-- it was his bad, not yours. This equation is for people who are already familiar with it, or at least similar equations, despite the author's claims that it can be easily understood by a novice (but only if explained better). Eventually, he gets around to filling in the blanks, if for some reason, you saw, "hf," and did not immediately think, "high frequency photons." Equations of this sort are something of a cant, only understood by the initiated.
It's great to see that you recognise the importance of nano seconds. It really peeves me off to see everyone heaping praise on those pompous micro seconds
The interesting aspects of time is that time has several reference uses but time never moves forward or backwards . When Einstein stated looking out into space was the future , he meant ''future'' space-time coordinates position . When you look ahead of you whilst in relative forward motion , your destination is your future position , time measured is the history of your journey .
Theo, you really need to stop this. Even if your boasts were true - and so far you have presented zero evidence, no-one wants to engage with someone whose sole purpose for being on the forum seems to be blowing their own trumpet and telling the world how much more perceptive/insightful/brighter they are than everyone else on the forum. Same thing applies in real life BTW. Why don't you try contributing or commenting on other threads about other things people are interested in for a change like politics or history or world affairs etc. You might actually learn something, teach something and get some 'likes'.
When people wake up and stop being so arrogant we may have a proper discussion and I won't have to be so proud and boisterous about my achievements . I am quite clearly a Faraday story ! Where would you like to start ? Do you know The Big Bang theory ? Do you know The Big Bang theory is incomplete and inaccurate ? Let us begin our discussion with a question , what is space and the properties of space ? The primary place to start is the definition : ''In astronomy and cosmology, space is the vast 3-dimensional region that begins where the earth's atmosphere ends. Space is usually thought to begin at the lowest altitude at which satellites can maintain orbits for a reasonable time without falling into the atmosphere.'' I have highlighted an instant error and corrected it . Space is an unspecified volume of spatial points (x0,y0,z0,.......n) Let us start here , the earth occupies space , space does not begin or end .
https://www.phy.cam.ac.uk/directory/dr-melissa-uchida I had a good friend who's son went to Cambridge and studied physics. His advisor was Dr. Melissa Uchida. He developed a fantastic crush on her and was shattered by her lack of reciprocity. It broke his mind and he returned to live with my friend, his mum, in Exeter, Devonshire. There have been rumors of inappropriate relations between my friend and her son, but it is seldom discussed being somewhat unseemly for polite conversation. Now he sits mostly in the garden, smoking opium, fantasizing about what could have been with Melissa. Interestingly, my friend's son also has claimed to imagine himself to be an uneducated modern Faraday, in spite of his brilliant work at the Cavendish Laboratory - choosing instead to also dribble away his talent posting inane equations on an American political forum simply to rile up the yanks, since Melissa had chosen to marry one. I am almost beginning to believe that Theodork is he, my friend's son, Harvey Manfredjin St John.... He becomes upset whenever anyone calls him stupid. He was actually named after the fictional character mentioned in this scene from A Fish Called Wanda. It's mind numbing, there's really just no way to make this sort of stuff up, is there? Harvey did his dissertation on the possibility of an additional 4 / 8 varieties of neutrinos. Brilliant work I've heard, that seemed to indicate the possibility of 4 chiral states and their counterparts, hence his infatuation with the 4/8 ratio. After his advisor shunned his advances, he began to reframe his ideas in terms of the broader concept of bulk energy and mass, culminating with his absurd opium induced idea, remarkably similar to Theodork's that mc^2 = E = 4/8.
https://www.phy.cam.ac.uk/directory/carterj Dr. Carter was one of her greatest sponsors and advocates. It is rumored that Janet had an attraction toward Melissa and that Melissa's lack of interest also drove Dr. Carter to have a bit of a mental breakdown.
You are not a physicist so what would you know about physics ? 4/8 is a precise measure of a 4 point layer of photon energy divided by an 8 point atomic volume hf4/lf8=0.5E hf0.5/lf16=0.03125E so on........ I will or won't make it in the future , one day somebody of political importance will back me up .
I make no claim Sir to understanding quantum physics. Nor do I make any claim to having attended Cambridge. However, as I have mentioned, my dear friend's son, attained his doctorate from the Cavendish school of physics. And he became pre-occupied with the idea that chirality consisted of four states and their inverse states, rather than simply left and right. Interestingly however, he never sought political support for his scientific ideas. Is this a new phenomenon these days in science? To seek political affirmation of scientific postulates?
When so called scientists are deniers of scientific truths , slowing down scientific advancement , who do you turn to ? Governments fund science in their budgets , I need politicians to listen and understand , then they can put their foot down on science for being arrogant . I am trying to save the world additionally , climate change is not just carbon emissions . Carbon emissions cause air pollution , Carbon emissions do not add extra energy to the earths system . There is nothing lost and nothing gained in regards to the transformations of energy (Antoine Lavoisier) . ''To seek political affirmation of scientific postulates?'' Yes indeed , please listen and think . Space is an unspecified volume of spatial points (x0.y0.z0,.........n) Spatial points cannot be created or destroyed Any given spatial point has the potential to be occupied by matter Any given spatial point is independent of matter Any given spatial point is timeless Any given spatial point is immovable (Newton : absolute space) Analogy 1 : An upside down transparent glass beaker was placed on a table An observer displaced the beaker relatively left of it's original position The air contained within the beaker moved simultaneously with the beaker The original positional volume space was left behind (immovable) Try this experiment ! For some reason science thinks space and matter are dependent , that is ridiculous logic . There is lots more too but this is a good starting point .
You are wise below your years my fellow PFer.... 26, is that correct? What year did you finish your doctorate in physics at Cambridge? Surely you must have known my friend's son, Harvey. Did you by any chance study under Dr. Uchida as well?
It doesn't really matter who my teachers were and FYI we fell out over physics because they were too arrogant to listen . I left and continued my education which I have never stopped all my life because there is always something new to memorize of interest . Additionally I have spent time understanding general physics consensus and challenging that consensus in various places but I am starting to think that most scientists are not that clever . All they seem to do is quote memories , ''google information'', as if axiom absolutes . Additionally if you didn't know , formal qualifications are no more than repeating memories of what is taught in pass requirement .
I left without any formal diploma's and if I had done the undergrad , my correct answers would of been deemed incorrect . I think for myself , I can access new information by thinking . I don't always need to recall educated memories , especially memories that have errors . I am remembering now that c=299 792 458 m / s and is the speed of light constant in a vacuum . That would be a tick rather than a red cross . However , what is the speed of light ? The speed = 0 m/s , which is the correct answer .
Are your questions relevant? I can engineer and have knowledge of advanced physics , I can teach advanced physics . The teachers got ''owned'' !
No you can't. No one will hire you without a degree. And you certainly will not teach physics or engineering without a doctorate in 2021.
Hmmm , yes I can ! Anyone can teach even if they haven't got the knowledge because they can google that information then mimic it . However , I have a vast knowledge of sciences including advanced physics topics such as what is mass ? Of course I have the correct answer and the present answer available to me ! To say nobody will hire me is a very narrow statement as the world is relatively large . Engineering design and physics go hand in hand , if somebody approached me such as Elon Musk , I'd teach him the physics and design needed for better rockets and/or star ships . There is nobody who could stop me doing that !
Someone who cannot form grammatically correct sentences is accusing others of not being "very clever"? Hilarious! You are obviously UNAWARE that one of DIFFERENCES between conventional and quantum computers is the ability for a Qubit to have the value of UNKNOWN in addition to the BINARY values. Given your subsequent posts you are, by your own admission, a college dropout without a job who erroneously believes that he has all of the answers to the universe. Given your absence of qualifications and bizarre beliefs you would probably find a more gullible audience among theists who would accept your baseless claims by just telling them that you were given this "insight" of yours by their imaginary deity. They would probably pay you to "edjamakate" them in your own personal version of "reality" as long as you praised jesus and said "amen" at the end of every sentence. If that is not your inclination then you should write a book and self publish it on Conspiracy websites. There you will find almost as large a gullible audience but you won't have to worship any imaginary deities. You really should play to your "strengths" but remaining in the Science forum means ruining what little remains of your "credibility" around here because no one is buying your pablum. Sad!
No problem I will just continue to crack all the unique code structure and eventually win big with revolutionary ideas .
