What does EXPLOITING this forum for employment offers and puerile bragging have to do with quantum physics? The CONTENT of your post is clearly TROLLING the Science forum. Sad!
No! Don't Go Boo! You are God's gift, or at least one of his special children, obviously! But if you do go, just for me, possibly the one PF member that appreciates that you may indeed have answers that eluded the likes of Einstein and Feynman and many many others, please, please, please, please, please, please, use the Robert Duvall pic from Voyage to the Bottom of the Sea for your Avatar! Pretty please, with sugar on top, use the f'g avatar. _ I can advise you how to set it for your account if you need help....
Firstly I am not exploiting this forum for employment offers and secondly you are not a scientist . If you are a scientist heaven help the earth as we would be trouble . If you don't understand quantum physics and the motion of quanta , that is not my problem , I suggest you learn like had to do .
Do you actually have any formal education at all? Have you actually had any formal classes in physics at the college level?
The CONTENT of your post exposes that as a FALSEHOOD. There are MANY different scientific DISCIPLINES. I have little doubt that YOU would be utterly LOST when it came to comprehending the principles behind the ones that I am qualified in given the PABLUM that you have posted in this thread.
If I wanted an avatar pic I would of used my own face . I understood Einstein on a deeper level which allowed me to discover answers that have eluded scientists . Answers that could only be answered by firstly correcting theoretical errors . My journey started many years ago by asking simple questions on present information in many different places to gather consensus on present information . I asked questions in example such as : What is mass ? What is the mechanism of gravity ? Why does light travel from (a) to (b) ? I was surprised that nobody knew the answers but could provide the measurement math . Anyway , to cut a long story short I learned physics to discover the answers for myself as nobody knew the answers . Mass is not kg , kg is a measure that does not describe the physics . Gravity is not an orbital calculation , gravity is the transition displacement of energy . Lights speed is zero , light does not have an 'engine'' , the speed is the consequence of temporal transitional displacement . Now this should be obvious that science didn't have the answers and I do , so obviously that makes me the worlds leading expert on the physics and understanding of the universe works .
Go on then , what are you qualified in and I will show you that you are not as clever as you are proclaiming ! State something to do with your qualification and we''ll see .
I don't see any scientists challenging my work ! I see you being immature and thinking you are in some way clever but I doubt you know anything about physics .
So you are a computer geek and you think you know physics ? Principles of quantum computing d/t No doubt you'll say that is wrong but speed is based on d//t and nano seconds are important in regards to processing speed . Quantum deals with quanta . P.s My mind is better at quantum computing than anything you could design .
Thank you for CONFIRMING that you are NOT the "worlds leading expert on the physics and understanding of the universe works". Sad!
Your are not very clever and I believe you are trying to bait me into giving you more information , perhaps to help you with AI designs . The fact is any quantum computer can not answer questions that have not been programmed into the Matrix of the system . Quantum computers are stupid and additionally blind . A quantum computer that was designed for AI purposes can only give a 50/50 probability of what hand I am holding up . Human quantum computers would answer correctly . Obvious you know nothing but programmed memories the same as your quantum computer .
I'm sure you did. Was it this one? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cambridge_High_School_(Georgia) Surely you are not claiming to have a D. Phil. in physics from this school, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_Cambridge are you? If so, what happened? Did you suffer a fit along the way, some type of seizure perhaps? What other possible reason might account for a guy with a doctorate in physics from Cambridge University to post of his brilliance and offer high school level formulas on a sub-forum of a random politics forum? If you are so brilliant, perhaps you might explain the reasons why you choose to even begin to debate physics with random internet people that have no education in physics. Not getting accepted by any of these are you? en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_physics_journals
I stated I was educated at Cambridge , other than that I never mentioned . Your lame attempts at an insult are poorly constructed . As for journals , I see no reason to write for a journals gain . Why am I on a politics forum ? Politicians suppose to be clever and able to think well . Do you observe any challenge to my physics ? Please feel free to get the best scientist you know to join this thread and see if they can find falsity in my physics and challenge it . Proof is in the pudding .
No doubt, why write for journals when you can publish your work here? Although I must admit, due to perhaps my limited level of intelligence, that I am confused how someone clearly of your level of insight and brilliance sees a path forward by publishing your profound insights here rather than in a known publication associated with quantum or theoretical physics. Silly me I suppose, but I really fail to see how you achieve this, "Naturally if I succeed , I get to exist in history and make my children proud of their fathers achievement ." By tossing off incoherent "equations" here at politicalforum.com. Perhaps, I'm missing the plot. This site is monitored by the illuminati and the masons, waiting for you specifically to bring the all spark?
Incoherent to whom ? I have already suggested you get a scientist involved in the thread if you have uncertainty . Why not be a ''conductor of an orchestra'' on a world stage such as this forum ? (E=mc^2) = 4/8 When the mediocre minded mathematicians realize that is a precise measure , they should also realize why x0+x0=x1 and x1^2=x1,y1 They really didn't understand what Einstein meant .
