At least 25 public schools, districts pushing kids' book featuring 'Whiteness' contract with devil:

Anyone here want to comment again about how the Right is making up CRT craziness and overreacting? Yeah. Sure.

 

This isn’t CRT, this is outright racism.

CRT is an examination of law and societal issues and how institutional dynamics impact them.
Most literature on CRT outright exclaim that explicit and intentional prejudices are not the major issue.

It isn’t so much that white people are bad but that the system has been stacked against some minority groups.

This book doesn’t do that, it places direct blame and guilt — something CRT doesn’t do. (Yes there are individuals that skew it to attack white people but they are not the majority).

I agree CRT is too complex for young children but it isn’t what y’all try to make it out to be.

 

Critical race theory not very popular in new educator survey. “Teaching critical race theory (CRT) doesn’t seem to be very popular among non-union educators, according to a new survey.”

That's because smart folks that are postracial respect stupid and racist theories.

"The Association of American Educators, a “non-union professional” organization of “non-union professional” organization focused on students as opposed to “partisan politics,” found that almost 90 percent of its members said CRT should not be required teaching, and over half said it shouldn’t even be optional."

The radical teachers unions are trying to cram this racist crap down everyone's throat.

The Highland County Press, "other key findings include":

 

And yet every single supporter of CRT that I have seen have also supported teaching this book and similar "education". Including the largest teachers union in the country.

 

This is patently false. You’re right about The claim CRT makes is that the system is stacked against black people.

What you neglect to mention is that CRT argues that said system was created by and sustained by white people FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE of benefitting the white population and discriminating against everyone else so that white peoples lives are easier and everyone else’s lives are more difficult.

Moreover CRT argues that if you are white deny their claims then you yourself are a racist because in reality that white person only wants to continue discriminating upon others to benefit themselves.

Along with a host of other absurdities it teaches.

 

LINK: Critical Race Theory Isn't a Curriculum. It's a Practice (Opinion) (edweek.org)

LINK: What Is Culturally Responsive Teaching? | Understood - For learning and thinking differences

Note how the above links/articles match so closely.

Here is an explanation of what CRT is from 2009 so its not "sullied" by today's agenda driven left or right. LINK: Microsoft Word - dc.doc (ed.gov)

Notice how the author of this peace openly admits that he believes CRT should be applied to preK-12 education. They are literally designing CRT to replace what they believe to be a systemic racism that (at least at that time) was/is prevalent in our school system. The article even hollers that color blindness and meritocracy are racist systems designed to keep whites in power. Which is complete horse dung. (no, this article is not evidence that they ARE teaching CRT in school....but it IS from a ed.gov site. Even IF all the lefties that deny CRT is being taught in our K-12 schools is true, (which is false) it IS being pushed to be put into our school system.

 

Like others above mentioned, it’s all intertwined. It’s not just the study or discussion of anything once it starts being used as evidence to change policy, laws or curriculum. Just like the textbook definition of Affirmative Action sounds nice and doesn’t claim to discriminate, yet in practice, it does.

 

Funny how leftists/liberals/Dems have either ignored this thread or abandoned it. Too much evidence I guess?

 

Evidence like which schools are pushing this? That seems to be missing.

The whole CRT thing reminds of the Satanic Panic of the 80's and 90's. Maybe Geraldo can do a special on FAUXNoise...

 

You mean evidence like was provided in post 21 (list) and 23 (link to a school website)? And did you read post 31 were I provided 2 articles arguing for CRT teaching in Pre-K-12 and a .gov document of a person that believes in teaching CRT Pre-K-12...from 2009.

 

Hating on whites is a real thing.

White spite: NYC principal ‘conspired to oust Caucasian teachers’


https://nypost.com/2021/07/10/washi...dence-in-principal-paula-lev-after-race-flap/

 

More morons!

 

I'm actually curious what @LangleyMan has to say about this.

 

Let's hope that in each district they find the official who approved the book and they are fired immediately and never work around children again. But I won't hold my breath.

 

Me too. But I'm not holding my breath. Another poster that tried to ignore the evidence by trying to ignore the posts that have provided the evidence he specifically asked for. Once I pointed them out he has ignored this thread.

 

if true, it's no different then hearing about schools that separate white and black proms, ect... just needs to be fixed

there will always be some pushing religion, race and political nonsense, when caught, address it, same as normal

25 schools in the entire USA, should not be hard to fix

 

now I would call that right wing view as ridiculous as what is being presented in the book

this is just fanatics pushing a view, we caught them, we address it hopefully

and not like schools that students record the teachers telling them they will go to hell and the school punishes the teacher and then bans the students from recording in the future without a teacher's knowledge

 

yes, teaching myths like either of those is not the place for the classroom for sure

unless it's an elective on myths I suppose

 

That is only 25 that one person came up with. I came up with another that is not on that list as I detailed in post 23. How many more are there? As my post #31 shows, this has been in the works since at least 2009. And the 1619 project is based on CRT nonsense. And that itself is in over 4,000 schools.

Not so easy to fix considering that.

 

O.K. ,so we had some stupid greedy white guys and some blacks also, who under the authority of the King of England decided to use slave labor to grow crops. It was the prevalent way of life back then as all country's citizens were the subjects of the King or Queen of the country they came from. Individual Sovereign rule would be considered Treason. Hard to believe, but, not all whites and blacks believed in forced slavery, chattel slavery, indentured servitude or the sole Sovereign of the Monarchies they were under. Imagine, they believed that "all lives mattered" and decided to form their own country inclusive of all. So they fought the Revolutionay War and won.

Unwittingly they drew up the Constitution and because thy had to have 9 States out of 13 to pass it they gave in to a few radicals who held them hostage unless slavery was allowed so they could grow thier crops. Power corrupts mens thinking and the sin was they allowed themselves to be held hostage and to make matters worse came up with the 4/5th rule for the Negroe race. Which was 1/5 more than it was for woman. The age of enlightenment wasn't a strong suit for our Forefathers to say the least. It actually took a Civil War to free the Negroe but not the woman until 1920.

So here we are with Critical Race Theory. Yes, the black and the Indian, were subjected to inhumane abuse by the white elites. Why? Because they were the minority power at the time. I have no doubt that if the predominant powers were in the hands of blacks and that whites were the minority the situation would be reversed. Someday China may be the ruling power in America and we all will be indoctrinated or thrown into slavery. So, if I give up my whiteness, am I suppose to go home and put on blackface like my governor, grab a bucket of Church's Chicken and watch basketball? I don't think so. I will continue to like my whiteness, grab me a couple red-hots and sit and watch Nascar. Sorry BLM. Then again maybe we can all get together and grab a bucket of chicken and some hotdogs and red-hots and watch some football.

 

Because Democrats were the major perpetrators of the majority of racism in this nation from the Civil war, to Jim Crow, to the civil rights act they voted against. They feel guilty for the own actions. Instead of eliminating statues... Maybe society should eliminate the one thing that caused the most harm to race relations over the last 200+ years... the Democratic party.

 

The synopsis given above is all that's needed. As I said from the onset, CRT, 1619, etc is clearly enemy propaganda. meant to destroy the bonds that bind Americans together, and is likely funded by Russians/Chinese, and/or both or all of the above. As Mueller himself noted in the report that the Russians were acutely aware of the racial divisions fault line. If it were me as POTUS, I'd have a serious investigation into the matter.

 

Here is what people just can't seem to wrap their heads around. Inhumane abuse was not a white trait... It was a human trait. African tribes were/are brutal to each other and other races while the native American's had the largest percentage of slave population as a percentage of their population in this nation. Even well after the 13th Amendment. Tribes would slaughter each other and take women and children as slaves. Asians had the largest total slaves in the world and do to this day.

As I state before, there were 3 times more Caucasian slaves in North Africa than there were of black slaves in the United States during the emancipation proclamation. Saying this is a white problem is EXTREMEly inaccurate and disingenuous! Inhuman abuse of other humans has always been a human problem, not a white problem. It was western nations that fought wars and died to end such practices.

 

Only if you assume the synopsis was true and accurate.

With FoxNews that is about a 50/50 chance.

This time they were correct.

 

Curriculums are established at the state or local level. If you want a national standard to correct that, perhaps we should consider just doing away with states altogether?