Ketanji can’t define what a woman is

Why do you expect me to answer your question when you won't answer mine?

Do chromosomes determine gender? And if not what does?

And you know most of these male to female transitions are not in that 1%, they firmly have male chromosomes. No amount of surgery on their genitals or hormone therapy will ever change that. Neither will dressing up and looking convincingly female.

And I said you folks.... Not you people.... You people are the ones that usually say you people....there, now I said you people.

 

Wrong.

 

you never asked a question and
because I haven't made claims. You did. With no basis for 100%of the population. And you admit it when you claim for 99%of the people.
I also know humanity isn't binary.

Where did they your biology or medical degree from?

 

Chromosomes are genetic and aren't neatly xx and xy 100% of the time.

Hence the non binary result of life.

 

I didn't did ask you a question I asked you if chromosomes determine sex.

I guess I will have to stay it again since evidently it was not clear enough.... Biological science tells us there are male and female of the human species and then there is the exceedingly rare indeterminate variety.

What percent of transgendered women do you think fall under that very rare indeterminate variety? The majority of them were clearly born men with male chromosomes and male genitalia. The chromosomes will never change, they will never have ovaries they will never have Fallopian tubes, never have a uterus.

 

That would be why I threw in the 1% or so for the rare variations.

 

What does it matter the percentage?
They exist.
They are not your neat binary option.

So, how do you think we should treat them?

 

Meaning not in your binary box.

 

You just won't answer will you?
Do chromosomes determine sex?
Just because there is a small percentage of naturally occurring anomalies does not mean that regular men get to just declare that they are women

 

Good. Regular men don't declare they are women.

 

You won't answer the question will you?

And by regular men I mean men with male chromosomes born with a penis and testicles. You know, biological males. Even if they decide to dress like a female

 

Omfg are you joking right now?

If it’s UNCONSTITUTIONAL then how can it be applied to ANYONE?

 

Omfg.
Look at the restrictions in place infringing on the 2A.
Claymores, LAWs, nukes.

Are abortions constitutional? They have been legal for 60 yrs.

So do you have her quote saying NO and EVER?

 

KETANJI BROWN JACKSON CAN’T DECIDE WHETHER INDIVIDUALS POSSESS NATURAL RIGHTS OR NOT.

"When Sen. Joe Manchin (D-WV) and Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME) said that they would be willing to vote for Ketanji Brown Jackson after her questioning during congressional hearings, it practically guaranteed that she would be confirmed."

John Locke weeps.

 

Ketanji Brown Jackson chose leniency even in baby sex torture cases.

And even with the reduced sentences, "she apologized to some of the kiddie-porn perverts for having to follow the statutes, which she called “substantially flawed.”"

She apologized to the kiddie-perverts for the actions of duly elected representative legislative branches. She didn't demand apologies from the kiddie-perverts.

A Staunch Advocate For Terrorists And Child Sex Abusers.​

This is a deeply disturbed woman, and yes, even though I'm not a biologist, she's obviously a woman and an attractive one. I'm sure her husband loves and treasures her, and I'm glad for that, but she is clearly not Supreme Court Material.

 

"Her orders as a trial judge undercuts the White House’s and Senate Democrats’ argument that her sentences were within the “normal range” or “mainstream” of child porn cases, as they try to defend her against growing allegations she is soft on crime."

​

"Jackson gave the bare minimum sentence to a defendant convicted of distributing images and videos of infants being sexually abused, and who had boasted of molesting his 13-year-old cousin, even though she knew the defendant refused “to take full responsibility” for his crimes."

Horrifying details of their crimes in the Court transcript too terrible to post, at the link. Despite her complete knowledge of all of this:

Soon to be released.​

And more unspeakable details of what he was trafficking in, also at the link.

So, while she hides behind experts to dodge the woman question, she dismisses experts when she wants to define deviancy down, even sexual deviancy against infants, toddlers and children.

 

"In her sentencing of Wesley Keith Hawkins" and you'll have to go to the link to see details of his crimes, "Jackson gave the young gay black man essentially a slap on the wrist — and then apologized to him for it. Instead of the two years of prison prosecutors asked for, she gave him just three months and sent him to a lower-security facility and even arranged special protections for his safety normally afforded cops sent to prison."

She claimed he was unlikely to reoffend:

So, in May 2021 she "remembered well" despite the years, but in March 2022, she had not retained even a fragment of recollection.

She's also a liar.​

Link has further details.

Lucas William Cane, Child Porn, Grooming, Molestation.​

She shrugged dismissively.

“She’s clearly not a mainstream judge. After she heard details of sex torture of young kids, including babies, she nonetheless disregarded the official sentencing guidelines and prosecutors’ recommendations to give rock-bottom sentences in eight of eight cases,” he said, adding that she seems “more concerned about the well-being of pedophiles than the safety of your children — and thanks to her, they may be living in your neighborhood right now.”[/quote]

 

Reality says that once a person pays their debt to society, they are free to move about. We can argue if that is right or wrong, but my guess is the spirit of the constitution says free once a debt is paid.

no, I’m not soft on pedophiles.

 

Has he ever held up to lose or not win as badly because of the controversy?

 

She has convenient moments of memory losses and pleads of ignorance about important matters.

 

Part of that debt is the post release requirements to register where ever you live and report to a parole officer and if so ordered further mental health treatments. Your debt can extend beyond incarcerations.

 

Are you going to apologize for saying I am mutilating my body?

 

If her nomination gets out of committee she appears to have enough votes to get confirmed.

 

The genitals of those that had 'reassigned' surgery do not look like the genitals of a normal person. They do not perform that way either.
Carving a ****hole out of your penis, or slapping skin and a pump over a vagina and calling it a dick, is nothing but self mutilation.

 

So you won't stake out your position before I do that?

By the only constant being change are you admitting that you thought the opposite on Garland?