How can homosexuality not be a perversion?

what’s funny is it all there for anyone to see. The bottom line is you refuse to man up and answer my questions. You won’t admit you believe someone else’s abortion is your business.

 

No..

You dont want free speech.

You want CONSEQUINCE FREE free speech.

There is not, and has never been such a thing.

FACT: The ONLY promise of free speech is from the government, in that they will not censor you. THATS IT.



As for un-natural.

LITERALLY EVERY SINGLE SPECIES OF MAMMEL has homosexual interactions. EVERY. SINGLE. ONE.

So. Basically, your post is nothing but garbage.

 

You got something to back up that every single one claim? I know we have observed many species where homosexual behavior occurs, but can you back up every single one?

ETA: Also don't expect a response from the OP. They've been banned.

 

If he had his way, yes, it WOULD be illegal to be a homosexual. I believe I have read him saying before he thinks all homosexuals should be killed.

 

I just noticed they had been banned. They will be back though. He always is.

And yes. Its well documented. Its not a hard reach to google it.

 

If that's the case then perhaps you'd better have a look at it.

 

Why? I already know you dodged my questions.

 

Splendid. This is where you answer the following questions:

[1] How, precisely, does homosexuality produce children? A lasting family?
[2] How, precisely, is homosexuality beneficial to one's health?
[3] What, precisely, does homosexuality accomplish other than selfish pleasure?

 

Procreation is the purpose of sex.

No. Do you?

 

So you ONLY have sex to procreate? How sad for you

So you only have disdain for gay couples who don't have kids. Got it

 

Your fantasy is your best friend I see. I suggest that you nourish it and don't worry about facts.

 

Do you believe it's your business if a total stranger wants to get an abortion? Yes or no

 

I will preface my response by clearly stating up front that you cannot refute, and are not refuting, either of the following statements:

[1] In principle, reproduction is possible via heterosexuality.
[2] In principle, reproduction is impossible via homosexuality.

No.

This is one of two particular "auto pilot" responses from people who condone homosexuality. It is not a refutation of #1 because diminishing fertility over the course of human life is a normal/natural occurrence. Those people were both fertile at a younger age. IOW, you are erroneously trying to apply one part of a human's life across the entirety of a human's life.

Wrong again.

This is the other "auto-pilot" response from people who condone homosexuality. It is likewise not a refutation of #1 because infertility is abnormal. IOW, you are attempting to equate an abnormality (infertility) with a normality (fertility).


Homosexuality, however, is different. It doesn't matter whether the couple is elderly (beyond their years of fertility) or not, or has always been infertile (due to some sort of abnormality) or not. In principle, it is impossible for man/man sex and for woman/woman sex (homosexuality) to yield offspring. On the flip side, in principle, it is possible for man/woman sex (heterosexuality) to yield offspring. These are biological truths that cannot be rationally denied.

It means that no family unit can result from homosexuality. It is an extension of my first point.

Speak for yourself, and irrelevant.

No, I'm not claiming that. They can definitely love each other.They can also love each other without engaging in homosexuality.

The act of homosexuality only yields selfish pleasure (ideally for both of the participants, respectively). It does not yield anything fruitful, such as children.

 

These question were not posted to me but I'll have a shot at answering them anyway:

No idea.

Giving in to your instincts is usually beneficial to one's health.

Have you never heard of the term "love"? My question to you is, what is the difference between heterosexual love and homosexual love?

 

and it destroys the family (so that the State can take it's place)

 

So .... you insist on being absurd even now.

 

And there's another dodge. Thank you

 

You need to get some sleep and when you wake up make a fortified decision to read ..... think about what you've read ...... and only then speak.

 

My question to you

Your reply

If that ain't a dodge I don't know what is. Perhaps it's you that needs some sleep.

 

Indeed, and at that time it was not a perversion. It was necessary for the human population to increase (and the genetics of humans at the time were pure). But after a period of time, genetics became tainted and hereditary problems arose, thus God eventually declared incest to be unlawful (IOW, there is good reason why incest is now a big no-no).

 

Here's what you should do:

1). Find my original post
2). Read it
3). Think about what I wrote.
4). Decide what it is that upsets you about it

If you are an honest person you ought to see that every response you've made since then has been absurd.

 

Nope. Homosexuality is a behavior. It is intimate relations with a person of the same sex.

The word itself stems from the Greek word 'homos', meaning "the same" and the Latin word 'sexual', pertaining to male and female.

 

Neither homosexuality nor heterosexuality produces children. Sexuality is the sexual attraction has to one sex/gender or the other. Sexual activity can easily be separate from sexuality. Many homosexuals can and do engage in heterosexual activity with a willing partner in order to produce children, creating lasting families. This is before we consider the homosexual woman who use IVF methods as many heterosexual women do.

Again sexuality itself, hetero or homo, does not accomplish this. However, sexual activity in and of itself, regardless of type is healthy in general. Both types of activity can also have risky behaviors that could be detrimental. There is no risk or benefit that exists in one that does not exist in the other as far as health goes.

Noting once again the difference between sexuality and activity, it accomplishes the exact same goals that heterosexual activity with a person who is sterile accomplishes.

Procreation is one purpose of sex, not the only purpose. Your mouth is used for eating, breathing, and communication (speaking, singing, etc). Your penis is used for waste disposal, procreation and pleasure. There are many parts as well as activities that have multiple purposes that may or may not occur at the same time, but the lack of the one purpose does not render the others moot.

 

Nothing upsets me. Just would like you to actually answer my very direct question.

 

"Wasting time" is your only purpose.