To be fair, California has now altered their laws to make it close to impossible to prosecute a woman for abortion after viability. New York legalizes really late term Abortion and celebrates like it's the Super Bowl Thank You New York The New York Times believes abortion should be safe, legal and romantic California close to passing law that would legalize killing babies after birth
The problem is it's not a doctor. It's a very low paid worker without any official medical training who has no idea if that abortion should be "authorized" or not. The law is totally set up to fail. Not only that but their latest new law would throw in vague language that could be interpreted as removing most any abortion from the "unauthorized" category. You can also see post #42 in this thread: New York legalizes really late term Abortion and celebrates like it's the Super Bowl, page 2 which goes over the specifics in the law, very similar to the one in CA. In a nutshell, it basically widens up the "health" exception and allows someone with no medical credentials to do a late-term abortion if they think it is for "health reasons", whatever that means, while also making a vague affirmation in a separate section that "a woman has a right to get abortion", with no specification of exactly how far into the pregnancy in that section. (also see post #55 )
Personally...because I do not trust the court system. Do you realize how many pregnancies spontaneously abort? (Often, with the woman not even realizing it.)
Most often much earlier than many of these abortions are done. That's a disingenuous argument, in my opinion. We've been over and over this before in other abortion threads, so I will not argue it here. (Start a new thread if you want to debate that in detail)
YES , because it 's THEIR BODY , THEIR DECISION.... """""Maybe STING operations, where she thinks she's getting her "procedure" at an underground clinic, she hops up on the table and spreads her legs, but they insert a red hot spicy suppository. kazenatsu, May 17, 2022"""""""""""""""""""""""""" It is all and only about punishing women for Anti-Choicers.......NOTHING to do with a fetus or "precious life"..
UNCHERRY PICKED POST YOU QUOTED: YES , because it 's THEIR BODY , THEIR DECISION.... """""Maybe STING operations, where she thinks she's getting her "procedure" at an underground clinic, she hops up on the table and spreads her legs, but they insert a red hot spicy suppository. kazenatsu, May 17, 2022"""""""""""""""""""""""""" It is all and only about punishing women for Anti-Choicers.......NOTHING to do with a fetus or "precious life".. Yes..... Is there some reason you don't want something you posted repeated ? I repeat : ""It is all and only about punishing women for Anti-Choicers.......NOTHING to do with a fetus or "precious life".."" because it's true..
How about we invent a pill or some kind of device to prevent pregnancy. Since liberals are all about mandatory shots, how about a shot in the arm that prevents pregnancy. That would be a cool invention.
* DUHHHHHHHHHHHHH there are pills and devices for contraception ....what TF century are you in???? However, NO one is obligated to use BC...
Left wing local governments don’t enforce laws anyway, (evidenced by the moral decay in the cities), so the discussion is pretty much moot.
It's just a cheap argument style to ignore the issues and then claim your view is the one that is self evident.