Well the numbers confirm we have a crime issue. It's going to be covered before elections because it's an issue with voters. This is a fact you can't get around and I notice you didn't even attempt to argue otherwise. And when it comes to manufacturing issues, the leftist media own that crown. Laughable that you even attempt to argue otherwise. That you're trying to pivot to this type of statement illustrates how weak your argument it. Everything I said was true and you didn't even try to argue otherwise because you know media matters 'manufactured' this issue and you bought it.
It is not the government's money to simply give away. There's also not constitutional to simply ignore the power of the purse.
My notifications work just fine ( as I am sure that yours do as well ) and if you had quoted me I would have seen it
NO... "Everything" that you said WASN'T TRUE... Not Even Close... But, what a FUN Game...Let Me Try... Up is Down, Hot is Cold, Black is White, "1+1=3" Everything I said was true and you didn't even try to argue otherwise ^How did I do? Anyway, back to the Actual OP Topic of Faux's Coverage of "Violent Crime" in relation to the Election: They were clearly trying to further a "Pre-Election Narrative", and then dropped the Faux News BS after the Election...
maybe I did not reply to you, don't know, don't know what thread you are talking about, so only guessing
US oil production is already at pre-pandemic levels. U.S. oil production nears 12 mln barrels/day, at pre-pandemic high
IMPEACH HUNTER BIDEN ! Oh, wait ... he's not an elected official, is he? Never mind ... </sarcasm> Republicans ran on crime and inflation, pointing fingers and assigning blame, making claims that they were going to address those issues if elected. But now that they have the House majority, what is their number one agenda? Nothing to help we the people with crime or inflation. No plans to lower taxes, or increase police funding, etc. Going after a bumbling fool who's parent holds office is their first priority. Let's hear it for the GQP! They have our backs! They alone can fix it!
Yes everything I said was true which is why you didn't even attempt to counter any of it. You're the second person to do this and the second person who wouldn't even attempt to actually refute what I said. I wanted to see who someone else was responding to so I clicked 'show ignored content' which is the only reason I saw your response to me. This is exactly why you're on ignore. You don't even attempt to add to the discussion. You quoted me, said I was wrong, but didn't even attempt a rebuttal. Your inability to add to the conversation is why I deemed your posts nothing but excess clutter....so I saw no use for them. I see things haven't changed.....
You mean during an election week they covered it? OMG thanks for pointing that out Media Matters! /facepalm
The elected official of concern is of course "the big guy" who received the 10% of Hunter Biden's deals as you well know and concern that payoffs to Hunter Biden impacted US policy.
Says the election denying partisan who sat here and pushed the "Russia elected Trump" fantasy so faithfully and usefully for so many years.... I hope you told them you needed at least a pittance of a paycheck for your usefulness.
Like I have already said now for the third time.... I mentioned you directly using the convenient mention function.... So why on Earth would I waste my time doing what I already did? Is the alert function malfunctioning on your device?
As long as it keeps cons out of power I will continue to do so. Hopefully a party eventually comes along that represents the people but until then it is left wing incompetence vs right wing evil.
On a global scale the people you call “progs” would be classified as fairly center with only a few outliers. I have no doubt that escapes you however as you continue to vote for a party with no path forward. Which isn’t really that surprising I guess.
And while Republicans in congress support the war in Europe Fox News is speaking out against it. Is CNN or MSNBC speaking out against the war? No they are in lockstep with the Democrats.
you can't bk a student loan, so you ask a good question.... why? What makes student loans different than other loans? why was Trump able to bk his loans when he had financial issues, but not a student?