Is Trump a sex predator?

You're right. Those accusations are on the same level as grabbing a woman by the p***sy and accusation of actual rape!

 

Well you could check into Katie halpier's allegations... But I wasn't aware that you were ready to excuse a racist and a pedo's claim sexual assaults on women because of how intense the assault was?! Lol. Progressives

 

Nope, just a womaniser.

 

No, the essential question is, did he do it.

As far as I am concerned the trial is a joke.

This is alleged to be a horrible sex assault case where the supposed victim cannot remember when it happened, cannot remember any details that can be corroborated by anyone else, and can prove none of the circumstances.

Let's take them one by one.

Donald Trump never traveled alone. This is proven. He always traveled with at least one bodyguard, usually an entourage. He keeps meticulous records. That's why she won't give a date as to when this 'happened'. Trump would supply records and witnesses proving he was a thousand miles away.

Donald Trump went into Bergdoff's once or twice. He went into the men's store (which is not the same store) and was there with bodyguards and a secretary. Virtually the entire staff of the store followed him around the whole time. Even in the 90's Trump was a major celebrity. The odds of him being ignored in any store are zero.

The odds of him going into a woman's dressing room, raping someone in a crowded store without anything being heard and no one saying, "Hey look, it's Donald Trump!" are zero.

The 'friend' who is 'corroborating' is also a notorious Trump hater, proven by her past public statements. There's an email to Carroll from another supporter saying Carroll "has gone too far with this".

This trial is being paid for by Reid Hoffman, another Trump hater. How much Carroll gets to keep of the money is unknown.

She claims to have saved the clothing she was raped in but refuses to produce it for the court. The anti-Trump judge allowed it, which is unheard of.

Look at the huge smile on Carroll's face going in and out of court every day. Is that a rape victim's smile? No, that's a "look at what I'm getting away with" smile.

She won't give any details because she knows she would be caught in them. It's like people who claim they're Elvis' lost child but refuse to take a DNA test.

Why is this all done? Because people know that lunatics hate Donald Trump so much that they will believe anything bad about him, no matter how insane. Donald Trump could be accused of murdering his wife, have his wife show up in court as a witness and say, "See, I'm still alive", and still be convicted by the Trump hating mob.

 

Matey....this Trial is in the real World...it is actually happening. What 'New York' thinks (huh?) is ..... *I am lost for words.*

You are wrong.

More relevantly, this is not a case where 'she said/he said.' The only evidence the Jury has seen and heard is what she said (corroborated by relevant and admissible evidence,) and there is no denial in evidence from Humpty.

They have not heard or read all (or any) of Humpty's huff and bullshit puff since the Trial started, and will be told by the Trial Judge to ignore everything and anything they have heard or read (from both sides) before they were empanelled.

 

There is no woman called Katie Halpier in your link and why are you talking about Trump's racist and pedo behaviour?

 

Yes.

You have me convinced already with that persuasive eloquence.

Yes, she is unable to provide a precise date and neither could, by way of comparison, Humpty tell us when he married his first wife or, for example, whether he was rooting the woman who became his second while still with his first.

Wrong. She gave consistent versions of the event and was unshaken in cross-examination. That the event did occur is legally corroborated by the evidence presented at the Trial, of 'recent complaint."

Rubbish. No evidence whatsoever was presented at the Trial to that effect. If that were true, why did he not present to that effect at the Trial when he had every opportunity to do so? He did not.

Even when he was a rubbish nobody third rate TV real estate wanker, back when this event occurred? If that were true, he would have produced evidence to that effect. He did not.

Where? And most relevantly....no evidence of that presented at the Trial.

Except he did not.

If that were true, he would have proven it all by people giving evidence to that effect at the Trail. He did not.

Except the evidence given at the Trial was that there was no-one else around the place at the relevant time. If that were true, he would have called evidence to that effect. He did not.

If that were true, he would have called evidence to that effect. He did not.

If that were true and relevant (which it isn't..relevant,) Humpty would have called evidence to that effect. He did not.

You have me there only because I have not read one way or the other. Can you show me where that became evidence at the Trial? If you can't, then there is no evidence given to that effect at the Trial because there was none. If Humpty had evidence to that effect, he could have called, or elicited it. Again, he did not....to my knowledge

Gawd...but...I'll stay on theme. If that was relevant, then Humpty would have shown the Jury evidence of it. He did not.

The only detail, she did not provide was an exact date. If Humpty reckons this event did not occur, he would have given evidence himself to that effect as was his right and as anyone would expect of an innocent person accused of rape. He did not.

Because E. Jean Carroll has given evidence that her rape by Humpty happened. That Jury is very likely going going to conclude, on the balance of probabilities that he did rape her. When that happens, your Hero will be forever tarred and feathered with that.

Sure.

Have you worked out the theme? The reality?

 

Just the fact that you call him "Humpty" proves my point that lunatics believe anything bad about Trump no matter what.

Perfect.

 

Thanks. I have been calling him Humpty Trumpty pretty much since I have been on this Forum....and....then...would you believe....the Washington Post had a blazing front page headline calling him...........

Guess what?

 

Walks like a pred, talks like a pred, acts like a pred. Yes, must be a pred.

 

Here ya go!

 

My apologies. If grabbing someone by the ***** is your kink, Tara Reade is the woman you want to listen too. Katie Halper was the woman who was interviewing her

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-52462113
"There was no exchange, really, he just had me up against the wall," she said to podcast host Katie Halper in March 2020.
"I remember it happened all at once... his hands were on me and underneath my clothes." He then penetrated her with his fingers, she said.
"I remember him saying, first, as he was doing it 'Do you want to go somewhere else?' and then him saying to me, when I pulled away... he said 'Come on man, I heard you liked me,'" she said.
"That phrase stayed with me."

Then there is good ole pedo Joe!

(She also confirmed the assault later on...so, ya. You can't shrug that one off)

And let's not forget racist Joe!


So I'm super curious as how you can explain your outrage towards Trump while at the same time willfully ignoring the many examples of disgusting behavior from the dude you picked who is currently destroying the country?

 

https://www.usnews.com/news/politic...president-donald-trumps-border-wall-was-built

458 miles. Which had included repairing or replacing older wall construction which was inadequate.

"The vast majority of the 458 miles were constructed in places where some kind of barrier already existed, but most of the preexisting structures were far less imposing than the new wall and included fencing and rudimentary technical barriers. The total figure also includes what the agency calls “secondary border wall” or sections of wall built behind pre existing barriers that ultimately remained in place."

So ya...he was actually working towards that promise.

 

I rest my case:

Unfortunately or FORTUNATELY.

 

If they don’t care that he’s a seditious traitor to their country, they’re not going to say peep about his ridiculous spray tan.

 

Are we supposed to read past the accusation now?

 

Well yea, especially as the link you provided highlighted the fact that the accuser had a history of lying

 

Unlike politicians?

 

Who woudda thought? lol

John Scott-Railton
@jsrailton

Remember Tara Reade? The one-time Biden accuser who became a Putin apologist... She's live on

Russian State TV announcing that she's defected. Sitting with Maria Butina whom she refers to as a friend. h/t
@OzKaterji






2:59 PM · May 30, 2023
·
334.6K
Views

 

Tara......Don't drink the TEA.

"She told the Russian state-owned news network Sputnik that she moved to Russia because she no longer feels safe in America.

“You have US and European citizens looking for safe haven here. And luckily, the Kremlin is accommodating. So we're lucky,” she said."

 

Good one Malcom.

 

It is a magnum mysterium

 

tara reade's subsequent defection to russia is a sign of her commitment to putin and extension of his oligarchy through his servant, trump,.