Biden Hires 24 Lawyers and Aides for White House War Room to Strategize for Likely GOP Impeachment

Bigfoot's existence is "unrefuted"...

SAME Question = Same Answer:



For the Umpteenth Time:
My Suggestion:
1) Ask THEM
2) Try Google or any other search engine of your choice
3) IF 1) and 2) lead someone to a Dead End, it would seem that asking random anonymous people on an internet forum for such an answer is extremely unlikely to yield a result...
^That is REALITY!
(However, it is clear that going around in circles must do wonders for the post count)...

 

The obvious problem there is that you don't distinguish between "Evidence exists" and "Someone said evidence exists." You have some people claiming there's evidence, but you have no actual evidence.

We can see the very obvious difference, which means you can't gaslight us by pretending evidence exists. You can't gaslight the legal system either.

Sure, you'll try, and when you fail, you'll blame it on the DeepState. That's one of the big benefits of being in the Trump cult. By definition, you can never be wrong. Whenever you are, it's only because of a DeepStateConspiracy.

 

Who is the big guy? Only one name has ever been mentioned and the left wing media doesn’t seem interested in finding out who it could be.

 

Biden does need all the help he can muster. Maybe the WH is putting out this fake information to garner such support for Sleepy Joe?

 

Basically, it's a bogeyman your side made up.

I hope that clarifies things for you. Everything your masters tell you is faked in some way.

 

There is NO PROOF (beyond that which is Uncorrobirated) that Joe Biden is the "Big Guy"...
^That is a FACT
In any event, I have a question and a statement:
Who is Bigfoot? Only one name (Sasquatch) has ever been mentioned and the left wing media doesn’t seem interested in finding out who it could be.

 

Brandon deserves to be impeached, and jailed. However I doubt republicans have the back bone to even impeach.

 

Projection at its finest.

 

There is a federal indictment that indictates such. Perhaps you need to read that and what his inner circles told the grand jury.

https://int.nyt.com/data/documentto...tment-2020-election/1f1c76972b25c802/full.pdf

 

Like the Steele dossier, Russia Russia Russia, German banks, Russian mafia, didn’t pay taxes, etc?

So who was HUNTER BIDEN, not the bogeyman, referring to as the big guy?

 

We have several bills to impeach Biden already filed in the House that range from the Border to Ukraine to China. The latest is Rep. Stuebe of Florida, but it also includes Rep MTG, Rep Randy Weber, Rep Bob Gibbs, Rep Lauren Boebert, Rep Andy Ogles and Bill Posey. These articles have been filed and has continued to do so since January 2021. The current articles of impeachment in the House include:

1. H. Res 420 by Rep. MTG
2. H Res 426 by Rep Bill Posey
3. H Res 493 by Rep Andy Ogles
4. H Res 503 by Lauren Boebert
5. No H Res number but that was filed in August 2023 by Rep Stuebe.

So, take your pick Blues. Stuebe's articles of impeachment is based on the House Oversight Committee "findings" so far while the others mainly focus on the US Border with Mexico.

 

No one knows, but the Conservative Media and several members of this forum say it is Joe Biden even though there was no proof. But if you read ALL of the text messages, "Big Guy" was left out of the deal by all the other members including Tony Bobulinski. In the end, it really does not matter since no money was transferred to the "Big Guy" as House Oversight claims otherwise.

 

Neither one. With JFK and Hawaii, Hawaii did change its vote from JFK to Nixon three months AFTER Congress certified the results of the election and after JFK was sworn in as President.

With Gore, there was a legitimate concern on those "butterfly ballots" in which a judge agreed in each of the four counties. How to count them was the main issue in which Gore wanted every indication of the intent of the voter. The State Supreme Court intervened first without even a group filing and issued a ruling. And the basis of that is what the US Supreme Court used in its ruling in how to count the votes.

 

As I said it is prudent. Trump did the same thing, with about a dozen or so lawyers, and his political advisors and staff handling the rest. Trump went onto Social Media to try to entice the crowd through his tweets calling it a sham or worse. So, hiring them, and reading the tea leaves correctly is no big deal and is really a non sequitur argument for the most part.

But if the Freedom Caucus want to impeach Biden, let them, that would energize the Democratic Base like nothing before and will get rid of the "senile" argument altogether. Meanwhile, Trump is facing 4 indictments with the first in March 2024 in the January 6th case in Washington DC, right before the Super Tuesday. If Trump is found guilty, that will change the whole ballgame in who is favoring who. Add the NYC Case and the Federal Documents case before the Republican National Convention, and the GOP has a major, major problem on their hands if Trump is the presumptive nominee at that point.

 

If Bank records, emails, text messages, fake email accounts, fake shell companies, etc is not evidence, then I have to ask. What would you consider to be sufficient evidence to at least warrant an investigation?

 

show me the bank records, emails, texts, fake email accounts, fake shell companies… I keep hearing about them but nobody provides hard evidence …

 

It sounds to me like the DOJ has been doing everything they can to obstruct the Republican's investigation. Perhaps that is why you don't get to see the hard evidence. If they can start an impeachment inquiry, they could at least hope to get some level of cooperation.

 

a lot of words for saying “I have no evidence “

 

Aren't you at least a little curious as to how at least 9 Biden family members made money through foreign wire transfers?

I'll repeat this again: At the time Biden went to Ukraine there was NO US policy to fire the prosecutor, Biden did that on his own. In fact, Ukraine at the time was being complimented on rooting out corruption. What I just mentioned came from official government communications and disseminated via FOIA requests. The official reason why Biden went to Ukraine had nothing to do with a prosecutor.

 

Good question...
When anybody gets a DEFINITIVE Answer (beyond uncorroborated BS) feel free to start a thread...
Until then?

 

Yeah?
And, So WHAT?
Anyway, back on-topic, the legal hirings seem like the prudent path (for any contingency).

 

once again for the hard of hearing … evidence… show me the official reason why Biden went to the Ukraine … show me who made money with evidence rather than innuendo …

 

All that’s left for you is to dismiss the source.

Have newly disclosed State memos demolished Biden's Ukraine defense?

Remember this scene? In 2018, Joe Biden bragged that he forced Ukraine president Petro Poroshenko to fire state prosecutor Viktor Shokin in 2015 by holding up $1 billion in US aid over Shokin’s supposed corruption. “I’m telling you, you’re not getting the billion dollars,” Biden tells the audience. “I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money. Well, son of a bitch. He got fired,” Biden said, laughing:

Shokin indeed got fired, an outcome that Biden claimed that the US and our allies required as a step toward correcting the corruption. However, a newly released memo from the State Department undermines the entire basis of Biden’s extortion on Poroshenko. Not only had the Obama administration assessed Shokin favorably before Biden’s trip to Kyiv, they had already approved the billion-dollar aid package:


https://hotair.com/ed-morrissey/202...mos-demolished-bidens-ukraine-defense-n573019

 

Not when you don't have any such evidence. And you don't. You only have people _saying_ such things exist, which is a totally different thing.

People making nonsense up is not evidence, and that's all you have. Making stories up works with the already brainwashed, but it has no effect on normal people, or on the legal system.

 

Making up nonsense? Has Biden refuted the bank records? Has anyone in Biden's camp refuted the laptop stuff? Has Biden denied that he is the big guy? Has anyone in Biden's camp gone on record and refuted any of those things?