Art dealer told Congress that Joe Biden called and met him while he sold Hunter Biden’s paintings

How many times were we told the Bidens wouldn't know the names of the people who purchased Hunter's artwork? Many. Not only was that a complete and total lie, it even surprised the art dealer when he heard the WH say it. The Bidens and his handlers didn't even think to call the dealer and tell him to go along with the lie.

Since we now have Biden & Co caught in a huge and intentional lie, the next question would be why would they lie and what are they hiding?

The article lists some of the buyers of the artwork.

 

From your article:

Thats someone making a point but covering their own ass….

 

So do rightists believe in unconfirmed sources again? I thought they said unconfirmed sources were fake news?

 

Are you unaware of what art dealers do? They buy paintings and other works from people either in need of the money (which Hunter was), or from estate sales. They then sell those paintings for a profit. It's how they make a living. They don't, as a rule, inform the seller of the identities of the buyers.

Geebus but you Biden haters get all twisted into pretzels over nothing. Get a grip, will ya?

 

The names of some of the buyers are shown in the article. So "likely" seems to be absolutely.

 

Why did Biden & Co lie about the firewall between the Bidens and the buyers?

 

The names of buyers most likely got to that article thar you linked via the art dealer.

 

no, it says this in the article:

So was the interview where he claimed to not know the buyers at the second sale ?

Im still very confused ast to why this is even a thread ?

 

Just another biden lie. Too many to keep track of. Remember when he promised to run the most transparent presidency?? LOL

 

What is it you think they are trying to hide regarding the paintings?

 

Quid pro quo

 

This is just a guess, but since the dealer went to the WH and spoke with Biden, the big guy may have written personal notes to be attached to each of the paintings to increase their value. Is that ethical? I have no idea.

 

Unless the notes divulged troop movements, I don’t see the issue.

 

Hahah they all say that, only idiots believe it

 

Who else promised to be the most transparent presidency?

 

If he lied, and so far it’s not proven, it was probably to help him win. Why else do politicians lie?

 

Who told Psaki to tell the world there was a secrecy deal between the WH and the dealer?

 

Well none promise to be secretive lol
And besides, most transparent is a low bar. Visitor logs are public, so it’s alredy more transparent than the guy he beat.

 

"the first son also made an unusual request to be informed about who bought his pieces"

how is that unusual?

 

The left continues to pretend "nothing to see here!" as their own commit crimes. Yet they focus on non existent crimes form Trump.

 

It's not the norm, at least according to the dealer.

 

You are going to have comparisons between the two presumptive nominees. If you don’t like it… then…

If it’s true Joe used leverage to help sell his son’s paintings then I am against that. His competitor however did far worse going as far to hire his own children and steer foreign nationals and events to his properties.

So even if true, your team doesn’t really have room to act like this is an issue. At least not without exposing some massive cognitive dissonant narratives.

 

He probably knew some but not most.

 

Maybe the deal was with Hunter

 

What crime is this?