This is not true. I was in SA to see relatives in the Cape and in Johannesburg two years after Mandela came to power. The guy in Johannesburg is a computer scientists who owns a business there. Everybody I knew there was white. We toured Soweto, a point of serious violence. There were school children in their various school color uniforms leaving for home. They waved and yelled hello to us. We went into stores there, very much NOT like US stores. We visited drinking establishment where we could get the beer the locals have been making for a LONG time. We visited the home where he grew up - now under preservation. There has been violence since then. Remember these people were denied their homes and farms by whites who took it from them and got wealthy. >>> Free people, who see a future, who have representation, have LOTS to do. I did not see hate there.
You didn't see hate there .. ? guess you didn't go into the ghetto or to the place where they do the tire roasts.
I didn't think it was much of a success at all from an economic perspective .. no surprise for reasons you pointed out earlier. What did that have to do with the Gaza Concentration camp .. and the current crimes against humanity - war crimes, and ethnic cleansing . .. South Africa was not that bad but like South Africa say .. "Hague is too good for Bibi" .. well was Irish delegation to UN that said that but SA concurs rest assured.
African Negroes have an average IQ of 75. They benefit from the white leadership they lost when apartheid came to an end.
It has been better for the black leaders. I do not think women have benefited from living in a country where one out four men admits he raped at least one female. I to not think anyone benefits from living in a country that has earned the title, "the AIDS capital of the world."
The Palestinians have had plenty of time to move, or become useful to the Jews as a source of docile, cheap labor. Because they have done neither, it is time for the Israelis to deport them.
so Arab countries got together, tried to cleanse the land of Jews, and lost ground. They should lose more after the rape, mutilation, murder, and kidnapping attack. I would love to hear that the hostages got released and the killing stops. If only Palestinian leadership cared about their people as much as they hate Jews.
Right .... LOL my thoughts exactly ... either conform and take your place as a sled dog or be exterminated or otherwise "Cleansed" from the land. The Zionist Charter in a sound bite .. well done .. put another star on the brown shirt fo show brother !
I assumed you posed it for dramatic effect rather than to elicit an answer. The twin terrors of slavery and genocide gave birth to the USA which has been good for a relative few and bad for many others. https://indianexpress.com/article/o...colonial-states-a-disaster-for-world-9044523/
Are you aware that all Arab countries in MENA, except for those in the Arabian Peninsula, are settler-colonial states? I'm very familiar with far-left attitudes toward the US and Israel. I don't need links to a nobody's opinion to understand your position. I didn't ask that question for dramatic effect. I'm genuinely interested in the uncanny ability of anti-Zionists not only to apply different standards to Israel compared to the rest of the world but also to feel righteous about it. Is being born in terror - for a state - good or bad?
If only Zionists would recognize the solution to their "Arab Question" has turned Israel into a racist, apartheid state based on collective punishment, ethnic cleansing, and genocide: https://www.palestine-studies.org/en/node/1654742 "During the earliest days of Zionist settler-colonization in Palestine, the Zionist leadership grappled with what it termed the 'Arab question' (hashelahha'arvait): the problem of creating a Jewish-majority settler state in Palestine where the indigenous Palestinian Arabs were the overwhelming majority of the population and owned much of the land. "For most mainstream Zionist leaders, the most favored solution became known as 'transfer': a euphemism denoting ethnic cleansing and the organized removal of the Palestinian population to neighboring Arab countries."
What policy would you suggest for Palestinians who refuse to be deported? https://www.google.com/search?sca_e...HcjxCncQ2v4IegQIDhBA&biw=795&bih=438&dpr=1.94 "noun: genocide; plural noun: genocides "the deliberate killing of a large number of people from a particular nation or ethnic group with the aim of destroying that nation or group. 'a campaign of genocide'"
I'm aware none of those countries has been credibly accused of committing genocide in the 21st Century. Can you say the same for Israel? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Middle_East_and_North_Africa#
No state in the last 76 years has been the beneficiary of a double standard for its human rights violations than Israel: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_Nations_resolutions_concerning_Israel "The following is a list of United Nations resolutions concerning Israel. As of 2013, the State of Israel had been condemned in 45 resolutions by the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC)." Can you point out any righteousness in genocide?
Why the 21st century? How do you choose at what point in time should history begin? Most Arab states are still settler-colonial states, notwithstanding the lack of accusations of genocide in the 21st century. The former is not dependent in any way on the latter. The Syrian civil war led to a genocide of the Yazidis though.
You didn't understand my post. Israel is being held to different standards compared to any other country in the world. Why? UN HRC is irrelevant as long as its members are China, Venezuela, Iran, and other such violators of basic human rights.
You are incorrect. Israel is by far the most diverse country in the region. It is the surrounding region that has been cleansed. Thats why you can't point out a thriving population of Jews, Christians, atheists, gay people, non-Muslims or those critical of religion/government. Israel did conquer a tiny strip of land they had taken from them. Muslim conquests were far more fruitful.
Yes, there has been a double standard. Genocide for profit has been accepted in the case of Israel. The US, the EU and others have DEFENDED Israel as they bulldoze the homes and farms of Palestinians and rule in their lands with Israeli military law in which Palestinian residents have no representation. The US provides the bombs and other munitions that Israel uses to slaughter Palestinians in Gaza. Where else has genocide for profit been accepted? It's LONG since time for this genocide for profit to end.
Because Israel is the only state on the planet currently being accused of plausibly committing genocide. Do you support Likud's positions on territory and settlements? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Likud#Ideological_positions "Territory "The original 1977 party platform stated that 'between the Sea and the Jordan there will only be Israeli sovereignty.'[134][135] "The 1999 Likud Party platform emphasized the right of settlement: "The Jewish communities in Judea, Samaria, and Gaza are the realization of Zionist values. "Settlement of the land is a clear expression of the unassailable right of the Jewish people to the Land of Israel and constitutes an important asset in the defense of the vital interests of the State of Israel. "The Likud will continue to strengthen and develop these communities and will prevent their uprooting"
Israel was founded on Zionism, a settler-colonial movement based on Jewish biological supremacy. What else explains the myth of Jewish nationhood other than racial supremacy? The fact that Israeli Jews tolerate diversity better than religious fundamentalists doesn't change the reality the major division within Israel society is between Jews and non-Jews. The Law of Return allows Jews from anywhere on the planet to emigrate to Israel anytime they want; Palestinians who have lived on their land for generations and were ethnically cleansed by Jews are denied such rights. Only Jews can be nationals in Israel and 93% of Israeli land is Jewish national land from which non-Jews are legally barred from. https://www.aljazeera.com/opinions/2019/2/7/why-israel-is-a-jewish-not-a-white-supremacist-state "Nazi Germany had the Nuremberg Laws, South Africa had the Population Registration Act and Israel has the Law of Return, each with its own 'race experts'."
Oh Jeez, another pro terrorism, anti-Israel thread. Do you people ever get tired of the same ole crap? sounds like the other side should have thought of the "LAW OF RETURN". I guess they were too busy pushing gays of rooftops and trying to figure out the most uncomfortable and covering clothing they could find to cover up women, you know, PRIORITIES! If they wanna act like barbarians then they will probably get wiped out like the barbarians did. just sayin